| Literature DB >> 30682806 |
Besma Khiari1, Manel Wakkel2, Souhir Abdelmoumen3, Mejdi Jeguirim4.
Abstract
The present paper aims to develop a low cost, efficient, and environmentally-friendly process to purify (industrial) waters contaminated by copper by the use of oil mill wastes, through kinetic, thermodynamic, and equilibrium investigations. To do so, the raw adsorbent was characterized using different analytical techniques including X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Then, the interaction between copper and olive residues were examined during batch adsorption tests at various operating parameters, such as pH, initial concentration, contact time, and particle size. Kinetic data were best fitted with Broeurs-Sotolongo kinetic model. Additionally, it was found that film and intraparticle diffusion steps controlled simultaneously the mass transfer of copper onto olive mill solid waste. Among the eight tested models, Broeurs-Sotolongo isotherm suited the most the sorption, with regards to the function errors analysis. It was deduced that the adsorption of copper does not involve chemical bonds with high energy which allows easier regeneration steps and higher number of biosorbent regeneration cycles without any need for applying high temperature in the desorption reaction systems. The adsorption capacity (18.93 mg/g) calculated on the basis of this model was close to the experimental value (18.4 mg/g) but more interestingly it brought up that 50% of the generated amounts of olive wastes in Tunisia could eliminate 1.84 kTons of copper from industrial waters.Entities:
Keywords: copper; equilibrium; mass transfer; modeling; olive mill solid waste
Year: 2019 PMID: 30682806 PMCID: PMC6384997 DOI: 10.3390/ma12030365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Experimental conditions.
| Contact Time | Particle Size | pH Solution | Initial Concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact time effect | 30–300 min | 0.5 mm | 5.25 | 200 mg/L |
| Particle size effect | 180 min | 0.5–2.8 mm | 5.25 | 200 mg/L |
| pH solution effect | 180 min | 0.5 mm | 3–9 | 200 mg/L |
| Initial concentration effect | 180 min | 0.5 mm | 5.25 | 20–320 mg/L |
Error functions.
| Error Function | Equation |
|---|---|
| The sum of the squares of the errors (SSE) |
|
| Hybrid fractional error function (HYBRID) |
|
| Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) |
|
| Correlation coefficient (R2) |
|
qe,exp, qe,cal and express the experimental, mean experimental and the calculated values of adsorption uptake. N indicates observations number in the experimental data.
Kinetic Models.
| Model | Equation |
|---|---|
| Pseudo first-order |
|
| Pseudo second-order |
|
| Elovich |
|
| Brouers–Sotolongo |
|
| Intra-particle diffusion |
|
| Film diffusion |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Equilibrium models.
| Model | Equation |
|---|---|
| Langmuir |
|
| Freundlich |
|
| Temkin |
|
| Dubinin-Radushkevich |
|
| Koble–Corrigan |
|
| Khan |
|
| Hill |
|
| Brouers–Sotolongo |
|
| Toth |
|
| Redlich–Peterson |
|
Figure 1X-ray diffractogram of olive mill solid waste.
Figure 2FTIR of olive mill solid waste.
Figure 3The effect of contact time on the removal of copper by olive mill solid waste.
Figure 4The removal yield of copper from aqueous solution by olive pomace.
Figure 5Effect of pH on copper removal from aqueous solution by olive oil pomace.
Figure 6Effect of the initial concentration of copper on its removal yield by olive pomace.
Figure 7Experimental and theoretical kinetic data of copper adsorption on olive mill solid waste.
Parameters of the kinetic models for the adsorption of copper by olive mill solid waste.
| Model | Parameter | Value | SSE | HYBRID | MPSD | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental qe (mg/g) | 18.4 | |||||
| Pseudo-first order | K1 (min−1) | 0.020 | 1.680 | 0.170 | 0.019 | 0.980 |
| qe (mg/g) | 18.664 | |||||
| Pseudo-second order | K2 (mg/g.min) | 0.001 | 5.290 | 0.487 | 0.051 | 0.928 |
| qe (mg/g) | 22.026 | |||||
| Elovich | α (mg/g.min) | 1.16 | 10.103 | 0.823 | 0.078 | 0.890 |
| β (g/mg) | 0.218 | |||||
| Brouers-Sotolongo | n | 2.454 | 0.198 | 0.011 | 0.0006 | 0.998 |
| τ (min) | 33.517 | |||||
| γ | 2.430 | |||||
| qe (mg/g) | 18.933 | |||||
Parameters of film and intraparticle diffusion models for copper uptake on olive pomace.
| Intraparticle Diffusion Model | Film Diffusion Model | Bi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
| 0.83 | 5.89 | 1.74 × 10−9 | 1.76 × 10−6 | 10−3 | 1.87 × 10−4 | 1.18 × 10−8 | |
Copper adsorption onto olive pomace at equilibrium and their fitting by two-parameter and three-parameter models.
| Model | Parameter | Value | SSE | HYBRID | MPSD | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Langmuir | qmax (mg∙g−1) | 29.285 | 7.341 | 0.568 | 0.066 | 0.987 |
| KL (L∙mg−1) | 0.060 | ||||||
| Temkin | bT (J∙mol−1) | 435.640 | 26.651 | 5.879 | 2.297 | 0.952 | |
| KT (L∙mg−1) | 0.889 | ||||||
| Freundlich | KF (L∙g−1) | 3.965 | 36.156 | 4.563 | 1.391 | 0.928 | |
| N | 2.351 | ||||||
| Dubinin- Radushkevich | qm (mol∙g−1) | 22.324 | 56.785 | 9.878 | 2.390 | 0.928 | |
| β (mol2∙KJ−2) | 1.13 × 10−5 | ||||||
|
| Brouers-Sotolongo | qbs (mg/g) | 23.797 | 4.243 | 0.529 | 0.128 | 0.993 |
| Kbs (L/mg) | 0.059 | ||||||
| A | 1.003 | ||||||
| Khan | qK (mg/g) | 65.325 | 4.690 | 0.493 | 0.108 | 0.992 | |
| bK (L/mg) | 0.023 | ||||||
| aK | 1.561 | ||||||
| Toth | qT (mg/g) | 24.875 | 4.846 | 0.676 | 0.185 | 0.992 | |
| KT (L/mg) | 0.050 | ||||||
| nT | 1.738 | ||||||
| Hill | qH (mg/g) | 26.936 | 6.074 | 0.786 | 0.217 | 0.989 | |
| nH | 1.184 | ||||||
| KH (L/g) | 22.159 | ||||||
| Kobbe-Corrigan | AKC (LnKC mg1–nKC/g) | 26.936 | 6.074 | 0.786 | 0.217 | 0.989 | |
| nKC | 1.184 | ||||||
| BKC ((L/mg)nKC) | 0.045 | ||||||
Figure 8Experimental and theoretical isotherms of copper removal by olive mill solid residues.
Comparison of rate constants for Cu(II) adsorption onto olive residues.
| Adsorbent | qmax (mg/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Olive mill solid waste | 23.6 | This study |
| Sugarcane Bagasse | 7.88 | [ |
| Orange peel | 15.27 | [ |
| Peanut hull | 21.25 | [ |
| Banana peel | 27.78 | [ |
| Mango peel | 46.09 | [ |
| Date palm waste | 0.47 | [ |