Parth K Modi1, Samuel R Kaufman2, Megan V Caram3, Chad Ellimoottil2, Vahakn B Shahinian4, Brent K Hollenbeck5. 1. Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI; Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI. Electronic address: pamodi@med.umich.edu. 2. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, MI. 4. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, MI. 5. Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI; Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which modifies reimbursement for office evaluation and management (E&M) visits. This policy moves payment to a single rate for levels 2 through 4 office E&M visits, regardless of complexity. METHODS: Using a 20% sample of 2015 National Medicare claims, we identified urologic practices and their practice organization, academic affiliation, and degree of office focus (ie, proportion of revenues from office visits). Using billing data for each practice, we calculated the revenues expected under the current system and the new policy (both E&M payments and a new add-on code). For each practice, we determined the impact of new payment rates on total Medicare payments. RESULTS: We identified 2822 practices: 1372 (48.6%) solo practices, 1033 (36.6%) multispecialty groups, 322 (11.4%) small urology groups, and 95 (3.4%) large urology groups. Under the new reimbursement rates, the median practice would have a 0.9% increase in Medicare Part B payments (range -20.4% to +50.3%) and, with the add-on code, an increase of 6.8% (range -7.5% to +74.9%). Solo practices had the most heterogeneity, with a quarter losing at least 2.3%. The median multispecialty group would increase payments by 0.4% (range -13.7% to 50.3%). However, the 107 (10.4%) academic multispecialty groups had a median gain of only 0.1% (range -2.8% to +8.1%). CONCLUSION: Urology groups would, on average, benefit from the anticipated change in Medicare office E&M visit payments. However, solo practices with a high office focus and academic multispecialty practices may see reduced Medicare payments.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which modifies reimbursement for office evaluation and management (E&M) visits. This policy moves payment to a single rate for levels 2 through 4 office E&M visits, regardless of complexity. METHODS: Using a 20% sample of 2015 National Medicare claims, we identified urologic practices and their practice organization, academic affiliation, and degree of office focus (ie, proportion of revenues from office visits). Using billing data for each practice, we calculated the revenues expected under the current system and the new policy (both E&M payments and a new add-on code). For each practice, we determined the impact of new payment rates on total Medicare payments. RESULTS: We identified 2822 practices: 1372 (48.6%) solo practices, 1033 (36.6%) multispecialty groups, 322 (11.4%) small urology groups, and 95 (3.4%) large urology groups. Under the new reimbursement rates, the median practice would have a 0.9% increase in Medicare Part B payments (range -20.4% to +50.3%) and, with the add-on code, an increase of 6.8% (range -7.5% to +74.9%). Solo practices had the most heterogeneity, with a quarter losing at least 2.3%. The median multispecialty group would increase payments by 0.4% (range -13.7% to 50.3%). However, the 107 (10.4%) academic multispecialty groups had a median gain of only 0.1% (range -2.8% to +8.1%). CONCLUSION: Urology groups would, on average, benefit from the anticipated change in Medicare office E&M visit payments. However, solo practices with a high office focus and academic multispecialty practices may see reduced Medicare payments.
Authors: Lawrence P Casalino; Patricia Ramsay; Laurence C Baker; Michael F Pesko; Stephen M Shortell Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Brent K Hollenbeck; Samuel R Kaufman; Phyllis Yan; Lindsey A Herrel; Tudor Borza; Florian R Schroeck; Bruce L Jacobs; Ted A Skolarus; Vahakn B Shahinian Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 20.096