Literature DB >> 30682296

Comparative Reliability of Screening Parameters for Anthracnose Resistance in Water Yam (Dioscorea alata).

Christian O Nwadili1, Joao Augusto2, Ranjana Bhattacharjee2, Joseph Atehnkeng2, Antonio Lopez-Montes2, T Joseph Onyeka3, P Lava Kumar2, Robert Asiedu2, Ranajit Bandyopadhyay2.   

Abstract

Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, is one of the major constraints limiting water yam (Dioscorea alata) production in the tropics. In this region, yam anthracnose control is mostly achieved by the deployment of moderately resistant yam genotypes. Therefore, screening for new sources of anthracnose resistance is an important aspect of yam research in the tropics. The reliability and applicability of different yam anthracnose rating parameters has not been fully examined. Disease severity on detached leaves in the laboratory and leaf severity, lesion size, and spore production on whole plants in the greenhouse were used to screen an F1 yam population and correlate screening results with field evaluations. Anthracnose lesion size had the smallest predicted residual means but whole-plant severity and detached-leaf severity had the best variance homogeneity and relatively small predicted residual means. The concordance correlation coefficient (rc) and κ statistic were used to determine the agreement between anthracnose rating parameters and field evaluations. Detached-leaf (rc = 0.95, κ = 0.81) and whole-plant (rc = 0.96, κ = 0.86) evaluations had high positive agreement with field evaluation but spore production (κ = 0.69) and lesion size (κ = 0.57) had moderate positive agreement. These results suggest that all the evaluated rating parameters can be used to successfully screen yam germplasm for anthracnose resistance but lesion size and spore production data may need to be transformed.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 30682296     DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-06-16-0924-RE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Dis        ISSN: 0191-2917            Impact factor:   4.438


  4 in total

1.  Characterization of some fungal pathogens causing anthracnose disease on yam in Cross River State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Nkese Ime Okon; Aniedi-Abasi Akpan Markson; Ekeng Ita Okon; Effiom Eyo Ita; Edak Aniedi Uyoh; Ene-Obong Effiom Ene-Obong; Valentine Otang Ntui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Identification of QTLs Controlling Resistance to Anthracnose Disease in Water Yam (Dioscorea alata).

Authors:  Paterne Angelot Agre; Kwabena Darkwa; Bunmi Olasanmi; Olufisayo Kolade; Pierre Mournet; Ranjana Bhattacharjee; Antonio Lopez-Montes; David De Koeyer; Patrick Adebola; Lava Kumar; Robert Asiedu; Asrat Asfaw
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Chromosome evolution and the genetic basis of agronomically important traits in greater yam.

Authors:  Jessen V Bredeson; Jessica B Lyons; Ibukun O Oniyinde; Nneka R Okereke; Olufisayo Kolade; Ikenna Nnabue; Christian O Nwadili; Eva Hřibová; Matthew Parker; Jeremiah Nwogha; Shengqiang Shu; Joseph Carlson; Robert Kariba; Samuel Muthemba; Katarzyna Knop; Geoffrey J Barton; Anna V Sherwood; Antonio Lopez-Montes; Robert Asiedu; Ramni Jamnadass; Alice Muchugi; David Goodstein; Chiedozie N Egesi; Jonathan Featherston; Asrat Asfaw; Gordon G Simpson; Jaroslav Doležel; Prasad S Hendre; Allen Van Deynze; Pullikanti Lava Kumar; Jude E Obidiegwu; Ranjana Bhattacharjee; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 4.  Strategies to combat the problem of yam anthracnose disease: Status and prospects.

Authors:  Valentine Otang Ntui; Edak Aniedi Uyoh; Effiom Eyo Ita; Aniedi-Abasi Akpan Markson; Jaindra Nath Tripathi; Nkese Ime Okon; Mfon Okon Akpan; Julius Oyohosuho Phillip; Ebiamadon Andi Brisibe; Ene-Obong Effiom Ene-Obong; Leena Tripathi
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.663

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.