| Literature DB >> 30682183 |
Yehuda Limony1, Slawomir Koziel2, Michael Friger3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The onset age of physiological puberty is greatly variable. This variability has been attributed to environmental factors and to genetic factors although a very little is explained by genome-wide associations studies. Previously, we reported the existence of an association between the onset age of puberty and final height. It is known that final height is associated with parental height (specifically, with the "target height"). We hypothesized that the variability of the onset age of puberty contributes to the attainment of a final height which is similar to the target height. We hypothesized that whenever a child's height-percentile differs from the target height percentile (we called this difference the "height gap"), the onset of puberty is advanced or delayed so that they are closer or even equal at the end of pubertal growth. The association between height gap and onset age of puberty was investigated in the reported study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30682183 PMCID: PMC6347184 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mean values (95% confidence interval) of the parameters used in the regression analysis.
| Onset age of the PGS | BMI percentile | BMI-SDS | Mid-parental height-SDS | Pre-pubertal height-SDS | Height gap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Israeli girls (n = 60) | 9.70 | 47.3 | -0.14 | -1.29 | -0.92 | 0.37 |
| Polish girls | 10.02 | 32.20 | -0.58 | -1.24 | -0.89 | 0.35 |
| Israeli boys | 12.55 | 49.02 (n = 38) | 0.04 (n = 38) | -1.46 | -1.70 | -0.24 |
| Polish boys | 11.96 | 39.87 | -0.32 | -1.21 | -0.63 | 0.58 |
Results of the regression analysis of the onset age of puberty with the height gap and the BMI percentiles.
| Israeli girls (n = 60) | Independent variables | coefficient | SE | standardized coefficient | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.90 | 0.156 | -0.556 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (percentile) | -0.017 | 0.004 | -0.358 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 10.84 | ||||
| Polish girls (n = 162) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.25 | 0.068 | -0.266 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (percentile) | -0.011 | 0.002 | -0.372 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 10.47 | ||||
| Israeli boys (n = 110) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -1.07 | 0.103 | -0.7068 | <0.001 | |
| intercept | 12.29 | ||||
| Polish boys (n = 173) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.34 | 0.079 | -0.312 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (percentile) | -0.007 | 0.003 | -0.162 | 0.026 | |
| Intercept | 12.43 |
Results of the regression analysis of the onset age of puberty with the height gap and the BMI-SDS.
| Israeli girls (n = 60) | Independent variables | coefficient | SE | Standardized coefficient | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.96 | 0.153 | -0.589 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (SDS) | -0.389 | 0.114 | -0.322 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 9.99 | ||||
| Polish girls (n = 162) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.25 | 0.068 | -0.269 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (SDS) | -0.332 | 0.064 | -0.364 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 9.921 | ||||
| Israeli boys (n = 110) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -1.07 | 0.103 | -0.7068 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 12.29 | ||||
| Polish boys (n = 173) | |||||
| Height gap (SDS) | -0.34 | 0.078 | -0.311 | <0.001 | |
| BMI (SDS) | -0.229 | 0.099 | -0.167 | 0.021 | |
| Intercept | 12.08 |
Fig 1"Height gap" and the age of onset of the pubertal growth spurt.
In this example, the target height is set to 0 SDS. The lines of 0, +1 and -1 SDS were generated using the Z scores of the heights of girls from the CDC 2000 tables [23]. The lines that describe the growth of girls whose onset of the PGS occurred at 8 years and 12 years were generated using the equations of the ICP model [21]. The "height gap" is the difference between the pre-pubertal child's height and his/her target height both of which are expressed in SDS. As is shown in this example, the positive "height gap" is associated with an early PGS and the negative "height gap" is associated with a delayed PGS.