Daiane Hemerich1,2, Jiayi Pei2,3, Magdalena Harakalova1, Jessica van Setten1, Sander Boymans4, Bas J Boukens5, Igor R Efimov6, Michelle Michels7, Jolanda van der Velden8, Aryan Vink9, Caroline Cheng3, Pim van der Harst10, Jason H Moore11, Michal Mokry12, Vinicius Tragante1, Folkert W Asselbergs1,13,14,15. 1. Department of Cardiology (D.H., M.H., J.v.S., V.T., F.W.A.), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. 2. CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília (D.H.). 3. Department of Nephrology and Hypertension (J.P., C.C.), UMC Utrecht. 4. Department of Genetics, Center for Molecular Medicine, Cancer Genomics Netherlands (S.B.), UMC Utrecht. 5. Department of Medical Biology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (B.J.B.). 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC (I.R.E.). 7. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (M. Michels). 8. Department of Physiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center (J.v.d.V.). 9. Department of Pathology (A.V.), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. 10. Department of Cardiology, UMC Groningen, NL (P.v.d.H.). 11. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, PA (J.H.M.). 12. Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht (M. Mokry.). 13. Durrer Center for Cardiogenetic Research, ICINNetherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht (F.W.A.). 14. Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences (F.W.A.), University College London, United Kingdom. 15. Health Data Research UK London, Institute of Health Informatics F.W.A.), University College London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regulatory elements may be involved in the mechanisms by which 52 loci influence myocardial mass, reflected by abnormal amplitude and duration of the QRS complex on the ECG. Functional annotation thus far did not take into account how these elements are affected in disease context. METHODS: We generated maps of regulatory elements on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (ChIP-seq N=14 and RNA-seq N=11) and nondiseased hearts (ChIP-seq N=4 and RNA-seq N=11). We tested enrichment of QRS-associated loci on elements differentially acetylated and directly regulating differentially expressed genes between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients and controls. We further performed functional annotation on QRS-associated loci using these maps of differentially active regulatory elements. RESULTS: Regions differentially affected in disease showed a stronger enrichment ( P=8.6×10-5) for QRS-associated variants than those not showing differential activity ( P=0.01). Promoters of genes differentially regulated between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients and controls showed more enrichment ( P=0.001) than differentially acetylated enhancers ( P=0.8) and super-enhancers ( P=0.025). We also identified 74 potential causal variants overlapping these differential regulatory elements. Eighteen of the genes mapped confirmed previous findings, now also pinpointing the potentially affected regulatory elements and candidate causal variants. Fourteen new genes were also mapped. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest differentially active regulatory elements between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients and controls can offer more insights into the mechanisms of QRS-associated loci than elements not affected by disease.
BACKGROUND: Regulatory elements may be involved in the mechanisms by which 52 loci influence myocardial mass, reflected by abnormal amplitude and duration of the QRS complex on the ECG. Functional annotation thus far did not take into account how these elements are affected in disease context. METHODS: We generated maps of regulatory elements on hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatients (ChIP-seq N=14 and RNA-seq N=11) and nondiseased hearts (ChIP-seq N=4 and RNA-seq N=11). We tested enrichment of QRS-associated loci on elements differentially acetylated and directly regulating differentially expressed genes between hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatients and controls. We further performed functional annotation on QRS-associated loci using these maps of differentially active regulatory elements. RESULTS: Regions differentially affected in disease showed a stronger enrichment ( P=8.6×10-5) for QRS-associated variants than those not showing differential activity ( P=0.01). Promoters of genes differentially regulated between hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatients and controls showed more enrichment ( P=0.001) than differentially acetylated enhancers ( P=0.8) and super-enhancers ( P=0.025). We also identified 74 potential causal variants overlapping these differential regulatory elements. Eighteen of the genes mapped confirmed previous findings, now also pinpointing the potentially affected regulatory elements and candidate causal variants. Fourteen new genes were also mapped. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest differentially active regulatory elements between hypertrophic cardiomyopathypatients and controls can offer more insights into the mechanisms of QRS-associated loci than elements not affected by disease.
Authors: Lan T M Dao; Ariel O Galindo-Albarrán; Jaime A Castro-Mondragon; Charlotte Andrieu-Soler; Alejandra Medina-Rivera; Charbel Souaid; Guillaume Charbonnier; Aurélien Griffon; Laurent Vanhille; Tharshana Stephen; Jaafar Alomairi; David Martin; Magali Torres; Nicolas Fernandez; Eric Soler; Jacques van Helden; Denis Puthier; Salvatore Spicuglia Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Linn Fagerberg; Björn M Hallström; Per Oksvold; Caroline Kampf; Dijana Djureinovic; Jacob Odeberg; Masato Habuka; Simin Tahmasebpoor; Angelika Danielsson; Karolina Edlund; Anna Asplund; Evelina Sjöstedt; Emma Lundberg; Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto; Marie Skogs; Jenny Ottosson Takanen; Holger Berling; Hanna Tegel; Jan Mulder; Peter Nilsson; Jochen M Schwenk; Cecilia Lindskog; Frida Danielsson; Adil Mardinoglu; Asa Sivertsson; Kalle von Feilitzen; Mattias Forsberg; Martin Zwahlen; IngMarie Olsson; Sanjay Navani; Mikael Huss; Jens Nielsen; Fredrik Ponten; Mathias Uhlén Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Martin Kircher; Daniela M Witten; Preti Jain; Brian J O'Roak; Gregory M Cooper; Jay Shendure Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2014-02-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Madapura M Pradeepa; Graeme R Grimes; Yatendra Kumar; Gabrielle Olley; Gillian C A Taylor; Robert Schneider; Wendy A Bickmore Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Elisabetta Manduchi; Daiane Hemerich; Jessica van Setten; Vinicius Tragante; Magdalena Harakalova; Jiayi Pei; Scott M Williams; Pim van der Harst; Folkert W Asselbergs; Jason H Moore Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: J Pei; M Schuldt; E Nagyova; J van der Velden; F W Asselbergs; M Harakalova; Z Gu; S El Bouhaddani; L Yiangou; M Jansen; J J A Calis; L M Dorsch; C Snijders Blok; N A M van den Dungen; N Lansu; B J Boukens; I R Efimov; M Michels; M C Verhaar; R de Weger; A Vink; F G van Steenbeek; A F Baas; R P Davis; H W Uh; D W D Kuster; C Cheng; M Mokry Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Yao Zhu; Mohammed Gagaoua; Anne Maria Mullen; Alan L Kelly; Torres Sweeney; Jamie Cafferky; Didier Viala; Ruth M Hamill Journal: Foods Date: 2021-04-27
Authors: Antoinette F van Ouwerkerk; Amelia W Hall; Zachary A Kadow; Sonja Lazarevic; Jasmeet S Reyat; Nathan R Tucker; Rangarajan D Nadadur; Fernanda M Bosada; Valerio Bianchi; Patrick T Ellinor; Larissa Fabritz; James F Martin; Wouter de Laat; Paulus Kirchhof; Ivan P Moskowitz; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 17.367