Literature DB >> 30680751

Nanoscale flow cytometry to distinguish subpopulations of prostate extracellular vesicles in patient plasma.

Ranjit S Padda1,2, Florence K Deng1,2, Sabine I Brett1,2, Colleen N Biggs3, Paul N Durfee3, Charles J Brinker3, Karla C Williams1, Hon S Leong1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if prostate-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) present in patient plasma samples are of exocytotic origin (exosomes) or released by the cell membrane (microparticles/microvesicles). Both malignant and normal prostate cells release two types of EVs into the circulation, exosomes, and microparticles/microvesicles which differ in size, origin, and mode of release. Determining what proportion of prostate-derived EVs are of exosomal versus microparticle/microvesicle EV subtype is of potential diagnostic significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-parametric analytical platforms such as nanoscale flow cytometry (nFC) were used to analyze prostate derived extracellular vesicles. Plasmas from prostate cancer (PCa) patient plasmas representing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), low grade prostate cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 3) and high grade prostate cancer (Gleason Score ≥4 + 4) were analyzed for various exosome markers (CD9, CD63, CD81) and a prostate specific tissue marker (prostate specific membrane antigen/PSMA).
RESULTS: By using nanoscale flow cytometry, we determine that prostate derived EVs are primarily of cell membrane origin, microparticles/microvesicles, and not all PSMA expressing EVs co-express exosomal markers such as CD9, CD63, and CD81. CD9 was the most abundant exosomal marker on prostate derived EVs (12-19%). There was no trend observed in terms of more PSMA + CD9 or PSMA + CD63 co-expressing EVs versus increasing grade of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION: The majority of prostate derived EVs present in plasmas are from the cell membrane as evidenced by their size and most importantly, lack of co-expression of exosomal markers such as CD9/CD63/CD81. In fact, CD81 was not present on any prostate derived EVs in patient plasmas whereas CD9 was present on a minority of prostate derived EVs. The addition of an exosomal marker for detection of prostate-derived EVs does not provide greater clarity in distinguishing EVs released by the prostate.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD63; CD9; PSMA; benign prostatic hyperplasia; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; nanoscale flow cytometry; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30680751     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biosensors for Detection of Human Placental Pathologies: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Current Trends.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Babak Mosavati; Andrew V Oleinikov; E Du
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 2.  Extracellular vesicles in urological malignancies: an update.

Authors:  Johannes Linxweiler; Kerstin Junker
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Using single-vesicle technologies to unravel the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Guillermo Bordanaba-Florit; Félix Royo; Sergei G Kruglik; Juan M Falcón-Pérez
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Leukocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Blood with and without EpCAM Enrichment.

Authors:  Afroditi Nanou; Leonie L Zeune; Leon W M M Terstappen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Clinicopathological Significance of Exosomal Proteins CD9 and CD63 and DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins in Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Benign Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kristofs Folkmanis; Elizabete Junk; Evelina Merdane; Inese Folkmane; Valdis Folkmanis; Igors Ivanovs; Janis Eglitis; Maris Jakubovskis; Sven Laabs; Sergejs Isajevs; Vilnis Lietuvietis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 6.  Overview of extracellular vesicle characterization techniques and introduction to combined reflectance and fluorescence confocal microscopy to distinguish extracellular vesicle subpopulations.

Authors:  Canan Bağcı; Melike Sever-Bahcekapili; Nevin Belder; Adam P S Bennett; Şefik Evren Erdener; Turgay Dalkara
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.593

7.  Diagnostic potential of serum extracellular vesicles expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen in urologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kyojiro Kawakami; Yasunori Fujita; Taku Kato; Kengo Horie; Takuya Koie; Keitaro Umezawa; Hiroki Tsumoto; Yuri Miura; Yasuo Katagiri; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Ikuroh Ohsawa; Kosuke Mizutani; Masafumi Ito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Myeloid Cell Modulation by Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Authors:  Ihor Arkhypov; Samantha Lasser; Vera Petrova; Rebekka Weber; Christopher Groth; Jochen Utikal; Peter Altevogt; Viktor Umansky
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Clinical significance of STEAP1 extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karan Khanna; Nikki Salmond; Kalan S Lynn; Hon S Leong; Karla C Williams
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Exosome Processing and Characterization Approaches for Research and Technology Development.

Authors:  James J Lai; Zoe L Chau; Sheng-You Chen; John J Hill; Katalin V Korpany; Nai-Wen Liang; Li-Han Lin; Yi-Hsuan Lin; Joanne K Liu; Yu-Chung Liu; Ruby Lunde; Wei-Ting Shen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 17.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.