Literature DB >> 30679867

Quality of research: Improper evaluation of the quality of trials of retention rates.

C E Jones, V W Berger.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2019        PMID： 30679867     DOI： 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN： 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  V W Berger; D V Exner
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ebru Kucukyilmaz; Selcuk Savas
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.874

3.  Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials?

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.

Authors:  Ugur Erdemir; Hande Sar Sancakli; Batu Can Yaman; Sevda Ozel; Taner Yucel; Esra Yıldız
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Bagherian; A Sarraf Shirazi
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up.

Authors:  M Jafarzadeh; B Malekafzali; N Tadayon; S Fallahi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.