| Literature DB >> 30679462 |
Jing Li1,2, Chunjing Song1,2, Chaoying He3,4.
Abstract
The origin of morphological novelties is an important but neglected issue of evolutionary biology. The fruit of the genus Physalis, a berry, is encapsulated by a novel morphological feature of the post-floral, accrescent calyx that is referred to as a Chinese lantern. The evolutionary developmental genetics of the Chinese lantern have been investigated in the last decade; however, the selective values of the morphological novelty remain elusive. Here, we measured the photosynthetic parameters of the fruiting calyces, monitored microclimatic variation within the Chinese lanterns during fruit development, performed floral-calyx-removal experiments, and recorded the fitness-related traits in Physalis floridana. Ultimately, we show that the green-fruiting calyx of Physalis has photosynthetic capabilities, thus serving as an energy source for fruit development. Moreover, the developing Chinese lantern provides a microclimate that benefits the development and maturation of berry and seed, and it improves plant fitness in terms of fruit/seed weight and number, and fruit maturation under low-temperature environments. Furthermore, the lantern structure facilitates the dispersal of fruits and seeds by water and wind. Our results suggest that the Chinese lantern morphology of Physalis is an evolutionary adaptive trait and improves plant fitness, thus providing new insight into the origin of morphological novelties.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30679462 PMCID: PMC6345875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36436-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The photosynthetic capability of green calyx contributes to fruit and seed development in Physalis floridana. (A) Quantification of calyx areas at different developmental stages in P. floridana. The blooming flower (MFl) stage was set as 0 day, and then floral buds were defined as 2, 5, and 7 days before flower open (DB), and fruit stages include the developing fruits 5, 10, and 20 days after fertilization (DF) and mature fruits (MFr). Bar = 5 mm. (B) Total chlorophyll content in the indicated tissues. (C) Light response curve of the indicated tissues. Pn, net photosynthetic rate; PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density. (D) The photosynthetic parameters. AQE, apparent quantum efficiency; LCP, light compensation point; LSP, light saturation point; Pn (max), the max net photosynthetic rate; Rd, dark respiration rate. These parameters reflect photosynthetic efficiency in different green tissues as indicated. (E,F) Wet and dry fruit weight under different conditions. CK, the intact Physalis fruits; naked, the naked Physalis berries; bagged, the bagged Physalis berries after removing the calyx. (G,H) Seed number per berry and 100-seed weight from different fruits as indicated. The significance of difference is indicated by *(P ≤ 0.05) and **(P ≤ 0.01). The black stars indicate the difference significance relative to CK, whereas the red stars indicate the difference between the naked and the bagged berries.
Figure 2Chinese lantern in Physalis floridana maintains a microclimate. (A) Diurnal variation of internal and external temperature of the Chinese lantern for three developmental stages as indicated in Fig. 1. Ti and Te indicate internal and external temperature of the lantern, respectively. 2(Ti-Te) was used to indicate the internal and external temperature difference of lanterns. Black horizontal line indicates no Ti and Te difference. (B) Variation of internal and external relative humidity (RH) of the Chinese lanterns in three developmental stages. RHi and RHe indicate internal and external RH of the Chinese lanterns, respectively. RHi-RHe indicates the internal and external RH difference of lanterns. (C) Variation of internal temperature of the Chinese lantern at three developmental stages under 16 °C conditions. (D) Variation of RHi relative to RHe of the Chinese lantern at three developmental stages under 16 °C conditions.
Figure 3Chinese lantern improves Physalis fitness in terms of fruit and seed development under low temperature (16 °C). (A–C) Fruits 30 d after fertilization. (A) An intact fruit. (B) A naked berry. (C) A bagged berry; paper bag removed. (D–F) Fruits 50 d after fertilization. (D) An intact fruit. (E) A naked berry. (F) A bagged berry; paper bag removed. Arrows indicate berries without a calyx. d, day. (G–I) Section of mature fruits. (G) An intact fruit. (H) A naked berry. (I) A bagged berry; paper bag removed. Bars = 5 mm. Mature seeds were not produced in the small, naked berry that was grown at 16 °C conditions. (J–L) Quantification of fruit setting rate (J) fruit weight (K) seed number per berry (L) and 100-seed weight (M) of the berries as indicated. The significance of differences is indicated by *(P ≤ 0.05) and **(P ≤ 0.01).
Figure 4Chinese lantern facilitates fruit dispersal. (A–C) Water-floating ability of fruits. (A) The intact Physalis floridana fruits. (B) The naked P. floridana berries. (C) The S. pimpinellifolium fruits. Bar = 1 cm. (D–F) Fruit dispersal mediated by water. (D) Diagram explanatory of fruit dispersal in the water. Tomato berry, naked berry and berry with the Chinese lantern started at one plane as indicated. (E) A demonstration of fruit distribution after 1 min water flow. Arrows indicate water flow direction. (F) Quantification of fruit dispersal distance as indicated in 1 min. Water flow speed was 1.52 cm/s. (G–I) Fruit dispersal by wind. (G) Diagrammatic demonstration of initiation setting. The indicated fruits were put in a circle with a radius of 19 cm as indicated. (H) A demonstration of fruit distribution after wind treatment. Spread distance indicated by dashed lines. (I) Quantification of the distance of fruit dispersal as indicated by time points. The significance of differences is indicated by *(P ≤ 0.05) and **(P ≤ 0.01).