Stephen R Benoit1, Bonnielin Swenor2, Linda S Geiss3, Edward W Gregg3, Jinan B Saaddine3. 1. Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA bvy8@cdc.gov. 2. The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 3. Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults, and although screening with eye exams is effective, screening rates are low. We evaluated eye exam visits over a 5-year period in a large population of insured patients 10-64 years of age with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used claims data from IBM Watson Health to identify patients with diabetes and continuous insurance coverage from 2010 to 2014. Diabetes and DR were defined using ICD-9 Clinical Modification codes. We calculated eye exam visit frequency by diabetes type over a 5-year period and estimated period prevalence and cumulative incidence of DR among those receiving an eye exam. RESULTS: Among the 298,383 insured patients with type 2 diabetes and no diagnosed DR, almost half had no eye exam visits over the 5-year period and only 15.3% met the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for annual or biennial eye exams. For the 2,949 patients with type 1 diabetes, one-third had no eye exam visits and 26.3% met ADA recommendations. The 5-year period prevalence and cumulative incidence of DR were 24.4% and 15.8%, respectively, for patients with type 2 diabetes and 54.0% and 33.4% for patients with type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of eye exams was alarmingly low, adding to the abundant literature that systemic changes in health care may be needed to detect and prevent vision-threatening eye disease among people with diabetes.
OBJECTIVE:Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults, and although screening with eye exams is effective, screening rates are low. We evaluated eye exam visits over a 5-year period in a large population of insured patients 10-64 years of age with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used claims data from IBM Watson Health to identify patients with diabetes and continuous insurance coverage from 2010 to 2014. Diabetes and DR were defined using ICD-9 Clinical Modification codes. We calculated eye exam visit frequency by diabetes type over a 5-year period and estimated period prevalence and cumulative incidence of DR among those receiving an eye exam. RESULTS: Among the 298,383 insured patients with type 2 diabetes and no diagnosed DR, almost half had no eye exam visits over the 5-year period and only 15.3% met the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for annual or biennial eye exams. For the 2,949 patients with type 1 diabetes, one-third had no eye exam visits and 26.3% met ADA recommendations. The 5-year period prevalence and cumulative incidence of DR were 24.4% and 15.8%, respectively, for patients with type 2 diabetes and 54.0% and 33.4% for patients with type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of eye exams was alarmingly low, adding to the abundant literature that systemic changes in health care may be needed to detect and prevent vision-threatening eye disease among people with diabetes.
Authors: Deborah Conte Santos; Laura Gomes Nunes de Melo; Marcela Haas Pizarro; Bianca S V Barros; Carlos Antonio Negrato; Luís Cristóvão Porto; Dayse A Silva; Karla Rezende Guerra Drummond; Luiza Harcar Muniz; Tessa Cerqueria Lemos Mattos; André Araújo Pinheiro; Felipe Mallmann; Franz Schubert Lopes Leal; Fernando Korn Malerbi; Paulo Henrique Morales; Marília Brito Gomes Journal: Acta Diabetol Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Galo Apolo; Austin Bohner; Anmol Pardeshi; Khristina Lung; Brian Toy; Brandon Wong; Brian Song; Andrew Camp; Benjamin Xu Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2022-01-25
Authors: Delaney M Curran; Brian Y Kim; Natasha Withers; Donald S Shepard; Christopher J Brady Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Ge Song; Kengyeh K Chu; Sanghoon Kim; Michael Crose; Brian Cox; Evan T Jelly; J Niklas Ulrich; Adam Wax Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Ana Bastos de Carvalho; S Lee Ware; Tamara Belcher; Franceska Mehmeti; Eric B Higgins; Rob Sprang; Cody Williams; Jamie L Studts; Christina R Studts Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-05-22
Authors: Michael D Abràmoff; Brad Cunningham; Bakul Patel; Malvina B Eydelman; Theodore Leng; Taiji Sakamoto; Barbara Blodi; S Marlene Grenon; Risa M Wolf; Arjun K Manrai; Justin M Ko; Michael F Chiang; Danton Char Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 14.277