Literature DB >> 30679242

Gut microbiota affects development and olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Huili Qiao1,2, Ian W Keesey1, Bill S Hansson1, Markus Knaden3.   

Abstract

It has been shown that gut microbes are very important for the behavior and development of Drosophila, as the beneficial microbes are involved in the identification of suitable feeding and egg-laying locations. However, in what way these associated gut microbes influence the fitness-related behaviors of Drosophila melanogaster remains unclear. Here, we show that D. melanogaster exhibits different behavioral preferences towards gut microbes. Both adults and larvae were attracted by the volatile compounds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum, but were repelled by Acetobacter malorum in behavioral assays, indicating that an olfactory mechanism is involved in these preference behaviors. While the attraction to yeast was governed by olfactory sensory neurons expressing the odorant co-receptor Orco, the observed behaviors towards the other microbes were retained in flies lacking this co-receptor. By experimentally manipulating the microbiota of the flies, we found that flies did not strive for a diverse microbiome by increasing their preference towards gut microbes that they had not experienced previously. Instead, in some cases, the flies even increased preference for the microbes on which they were reared. Furthermore, exposing Drosophila larvae to all three microbes promoted Drosophila development, while exposure to only S. cerevisiae and A. malorum resulted in the development of larger ovaries and in increased egg numbers in an oviposition assay. Thus, our study provides a better understanding of how gut microbes affect insect behavior and development, and offers an ecological rationale for preferences of flies for different microbes in their natural environment.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Gut bacteria; Host–microbe interaction; Olfaction; Yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30679242     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.192500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  16 in total

1.  Secondary Symbionts Affect Foraging Capacities of Plant-Specialized Genotypes of the Pea Aphid.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Simon; Yannick Outreman; Corentin Sochard; Corentin Dupont
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Upper-limit agricultural dietary exposure to streptomycin in the laboratory reduces learning and foraging in bumblebees.

Authors:  Laura Avila; Elizabeth Dunne; David Hofmann; Berry J Brosi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Development of Resistance to Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum In Vitro Is Followed by Genomic Rearrangements and Evolution of Virulence.

Authors:  V V Kostenko; A A Mouzykantov; N B Baranova; E A Boulygina; M I Markelova; D R Khusnutdinova; M V Trushin; O A Chernova; V M Chernov
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Live yeast in juvenile diet induces species-specific effects on Drosophila adult behaviour and fitness.

Authors:  Juliette Murgier; Claude Everaerts; Jean-Pierre Farine; Jean-François Ferveur
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Divergent sensory investment mirrors potential speciation via niche partitioning across Drosophila.

Authors:  Markus Knaden; Bill S Hansson; Ian W Keesey; Veit Grabe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  The Holobiont Blindspot: Relating Host-Microbiome Interactions to Cognitive Biases and the Concept of the "Umwelt".

Authors:  Jake M Robinson; Ross Cameron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-16

7.  Preconditioning With Natural Microbiota Strain Ochrobactrum vermis MYb71 Influences Caenorhabditis elegans Behavior.

Authors:  Carola Petersen; Barbara Pees; Christina Martínez Christophersen; Matthias Leippe
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Divergence together with microbes: A comparative study of the associated microbiomes in the closely related Littorina species.

Authors:  Arina L Maltseva; Marina A Varfolomeeva; Elizaveta R Gafarova; Marina A Z Panova; Natalia A Mikhailova; Andrei I Granovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex-Dependent Effects of the Microbiome on Foraging and Locomotion in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Runhang Shu; Daniel A Hahn; Edouard Jurkevitch; Oscar E Liburd; Boaz Yuval; Adam Chun-Nin Wong
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Interactions between the microbiome and mating influence the female's transcriptional profile in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sofie Y N Delbare; Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.