Kurtis D Carlock1, Kyle R Hildebrandt1, Sanjit R Konda2, Kenneth A Egol3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, NY, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, NY, USA. Electronic address: Kenneth.Egol@nyumc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of regional anaesthesia as compared to general anaesthesia on clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following long bone fracture nonunion repair. METHODS: 262 patients who underwent operative repair of a long bone fracture nonunion and had at least 12 months of post-operative follow up were included in this study. Functional outcomes were assessed prospectively using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores prior to nonunion repair and at routine intervals post-operatively. Patients were divided into two matched groups based upon the type of anaesthetic method used in surgery. The regional anaesthesia cohort was composed of all patients who received regional anaesthesia (spinal anaesthesia or peripheral nerve block) alone or in addition to general anaesthesia, while patients who received general anaesthesia alone made up the general anaesthesia cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the effect of anaesthesia type on functional outcome scores, post-operative pain, bony healing, and complication rate. RESULTS: The regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia cohorts each consisted of 131 patients. Multiple linear regression demonstrated there to be no significant association between anaesthetic method and total SMFA scores at all post-operative time points. Additionally, anaesthetic method was not associated with post-operative VAS pain scores, time to union, or the rate of post-operative complications. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the use of regional anaesthesia during operative repair of long bone fracture nonunion was associated with no significant difference in functional outcome scores or pain levels at all post-operative time points. Furthermore, the use of regional anaesthesia had no effect on the rate of post-operative complications. Either type of anaesthetic appears to be safe and effective in performing these surgeries.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of regional anaesthesia as compared to general anaesthesia on clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following long bone fracture nonunion repair. METHODS: 262 patients who underwent operative repair of a long bone fracture nonunion and had at least 12 months of post-operative follow up were included in this study. Functional outcomes were assessed prospectively using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores prior to nonunion repair and at routine intervals post-operatively. Patients were divided into two matched groups based upon the type of anaesthetic method used in surgery. The regional anaesthesia cohort was composed of all patients who received regional anaesthesia (spinal anaesthesia or peripheral nerve block) alone or in addition to general anaesthesia, while patients who received general anaesthesia alone made up the general anaesthesia cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the effect of anaesthesia type on functional outcome scores, post-operative pain, bony healing, and complication rate. RESULTS: The regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia cohorts each consisted of 131 patients. Multiple linear regression demonstrated there to be no significant association between anaesthetic method and total SMFA scores at all post-operative time points. Additionally, anaesthetic method was not associated with post-operative VAS pain scores, time to union, or the rate of post-operative complications. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the use of regional anaesthesia during operative repair of long bone fracture nonunion was associated with no significant difference in functional outcome scores or pain levels at all post-operative time points. Furthermore, the use of regional anaesthesia had no effect on the rate of post-operative complications. Either type of anaesthetic appears to be safe and effective in performing these surgeries.