Literature DB >> 30678799

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Are Ineligible for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement.

Hiroki Niikura1, Mario Gössl1, Vibhu Kshettry1, Sara Olson1, Benjamin Sun1, Judah Askew1, Larissa Stanberry1, Ross Garberich1, Liang Tang1, John Lesser1, Richard Bae1, Kevin M Harris1, Steven M Bradley1, Paul Sorajja2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to gain insight into the causes and outcomes of patients who do not qualify for transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing availability of TMVR, patients with severe mitral regurgitation may not be eligible. Thus far, no investigation has examined ineligible patients and their clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 203 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years, 48% men) who were ineligible for participation in early feasibility studies of TMVR were examined.
RESULTS: The ineligibility rate for TMVR was 89.0%. The most common reasons for TMVR exclusion were excessive frailty (15.3%), severe tricuspid regurgitation (15.3%), and prior aortic valve therapy (14.2%). Mitral anatomic exclusions were present in 15.8%, with severe annular calcification in 7.4%, and risk for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was notably infrequent (4.4%). Overall, 76 patients (37.4%) did not undergo subsequent commercial surgical or transcatheter mitral therapy. Patients not eligible for TMVR and not treated commercially had high rates of cardiac death (11.8%) and death or heart failure hospitalization (22.4%) at 1 year. These rates were significantly higher than those who underwent surgery (2.4% for cardiac death; p < 0.001; 5.5% for heart failure hospitalization; p = 0.003) and remained worse after excluding patients with excessive frailty or medical futility and in multivariate modeling that adjusted for baseline differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients ineligible for TMVR and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data and the high rate of TMVR screen failure support the need for therapy iteration as well as development of alternative means of management, with the goal of improving the prognosis of these patients.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mitral regurgitation; mitral surgery; transcatheter mitral repair; transcatheter mitral valve replacement

Year:  2019        PMID: 30678799     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  4 in total

1.  Early results of a real-world series with two transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement devices.

Authors:  S Ludwig; D Kalbacher; N Schofer; A Schäfer; B Koell; M Seiffert; J Schirmer; U Schäfer; D Westermann; H Reichenspurner; S Blankenberg; E Lubos; L Conradi
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Open transcatheter valve implantation for mitral annular calcification: One-year outcomes.

Authors:  Umar Imran Hamid; Anne Gregg; Peter Ball; Colum Owens; Ganesh Manoharan; Mark S Spence; Reuben Jeganathan
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-10

Review 3.  Current Devices and Complications Related to Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: The Bumpy Road to the Top.

Authors:  Faraj Kargoli; Matteo Pagnesi; Kusha Rahgozar; Ythan Goldberg; Edwin Ho; Mei Chau; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 4.  Imaging in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: State-of-Art Review.

Authors:  Manuel Barreiro-Perez; Berenice Caneiro-Queija; Luis Puga; Rocío Gonzalez-Ferreiro; Robert Alarcon; Jose Antonio Parada; Andrés Iñiguez-Romo; Rodrigo Estevez-Loureiro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.