| Literature DB >> 30678340 |
Marzie Naserikia1, Elyas Asadi Shamsabadi2, Mojtaba Rafieian3, Walter Leal Filho4.
Abstract
In this study, the spatio-temporal changes of urban heat island (UHI) in a mega city located in a semi-arid region and the relationships with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) are appraised using Landsat TM/OLI images with the help of ENVI and ArcGIS software. The results reveal that the relationships between NDBI, NDVI and land surface temperature (LST) varied by year in the study area and they are not suitable indices to study the land surface temperature in arid and semi-arid regions. The study also highlights the importance of weather conditions when appraising the relationship of these indices with land surface temperature. Overall, it can be concluded that LST in arid and steppe regions is most influenced by barren soil. As a result, built-up areas surrounded by soil or bituminous asphalt experience higher land surface temperatures compared to densely built-up areas. Therefore, apart from setting-up more green areas, an effective way to reduce the intensity of UHI in these regions is to develop the use of cool and smart pavements. The experiences from this paper may be of use to cities, many of which are struggling to adapt to a changing climate.Entities:
Keywords: arid and semi-arid regions; climate change; land cover; urban heat island
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678340 PMCID: PMC6388183 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
State of the art.
| No. | Year | Author(s) | Data | Case Study | Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | Streutker [ | NOAA AVHRR | Houston, TX | The increase in the magnitude and mean area of UHI |
| Results |
When assessing UHI, it should be considered a dynamic meteorological feature. The outcomes of the assessment vary depending on the method of analysis. Environmental and spatial variables (such as cloud cover and vegetation cover, respectively) play important roles in the UHI extent and intensity. | ||||
| 2 | 2004 | Weng et al. [ | Landsat ETM+ | Indianapolis City, IN, USA | The LST-vegetation abundance relationship |
| Results |
The spatial distributions of LST are directly proportional to the variations of NDVI and the distribution pattern of green spaces. The spatial patterns of UHIs are affected by the interplay of thermal dynamics and the temporal and spatial patterns of vegetation fraction. | ||||
| 3 | 2005 | Tran et al. [ | TERRA/MODISLandsat ETM+ | Eight Asian mega cities | The UHI effects and spatial patterns |
| Results |
The population density may strongly influence the intensity and spatial development of UHI. | ||||
| 4 | 2005 | Chen et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+ | Pearl River Delta, China | The relationship between LULC changes and UHI |
| Results |
Land cover type can influence the temperature variations and pattern in the UHI. Temperature can be positively related with NDBI. Remote sensing indices showing vegetation cover (NDVI), and surface moisture (NDWI) are negatively correlated with temperature in cases of limited ranges of NDVI (less than 0.6). | ||||
| 5 | 2005 | Kim and Baik [ | Automatic Weather Stations | Seoul, Korea | Tempo-spatial UHI |
| Results |
Increase in cloud cover and wind speed decrease the magnitude of UHI. In Seoul, the UHI was stronger on weekdays and the nighttime than weekends and the daytime, respectively, between March 2001 and February 2002. | ||||
| 6 | 2006 | Stathopoulou and Cartalis [ | Landsat ETM+Corine database | Major cities in Greece | Thermal environment during daytime and warm period |
| Results |
Specific land uses and properties (including densely built-up areas near to ports) can form the hottest spots in an urban environment. | ||||
| 7 | 2007 | Jusuf et al. [ | Landsat ETM+ | Singapore | The relationship between different LULC and UHI |
| Results |
The thermal condition of an urban environment can be influenced by the land use type. The respective coolest and hottest land use types are park and industrial zones in daytime, and airport and commercial zones in nighttime. | ||||
| 8 | 2009 | Li et al. [ | Landsat TM | Shanghai, China | Quantitative evaluation of UHI |
| Results |
Various factors can be responsible for complex patterns of UHI. Remarkable increases both in extent and magnitude of the UHI, particularly hot surfaces, in Shanghai were observed, from 1997 to 2004. | ||||
| 9 | 2010 | Tan et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+ | Penang Island, Malaysia | The changes in LULC |
| Results |
LULC changes can result in a significant Urban Heat Island Intensity (UHII). LST was strongly correlated with NDVI in all the LULC types of the study area, | ||||
| 10 | 2011 | Peng et al. [ | MODIS Data | Global big cities | The differences in surface UHI intensity and potentially affecting biophysical and socio-economic driving factors |
| Results |
The difference in albedo and nighttime light affect the pattern of nighttime Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity (SUHII). There is a negative correlation between daytime SUHII and vegetation cover. Vegetation cover and green spaces have the capability to mitigate the adverse effects of UHI. | ||||
| 11 | 2012 | Li et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+ | Shanghai, China | Time series of LULC maps and patterns of UHIs |
| Results |
Green spaces, population and road density significantly relate with LST. | ||||
| 12 | 2012 | Connors et al. [ | ASTER | Phoenix, Arizona, USA | The effects of the spatial patterns of land covers on UHI |
| Results |
The relative influences of urban context variations on LST associate with land use types. The relationship between LST and LULC is inconsistent for different areas and land uses. The temperature is function of urban context configuration. | ||||
| 13 | 2014 | Zhou et al. [ | Landsat ETM+ | Gwynns Falls watershed, Maryland, USA | The relationships between LST and LULC variables in different seasons |
| Results |
Seasonal variations do not influence the way that LULC variables affect LST prediction. Time changes the size of the context variables influence on LST prediction, with the best conditions for predicting LST in summer. During summer and autumn, vegetation covers like tree canopy, which has the high capability of restricting UHI, are appropriate variables for predicting LST. Correlation between LST and LULC is not significantly proportional to the spatial resolution of context images. | ||||
| 14 | 2015 | Fathian et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+ | Urmia Lake basin, Iran | The relationship between LST and LULC |
| Results |
Urban context variations are the most important factors determining variations of LST. | ||||
| 15 | 2016 | Amanollahi et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+ | Malaysia | The effects of LULC changes on the UHI |
| Results |
When using remotely sensed data to study changes in LULC and LST in tropical regions, the main problem would be cloudiness. The physical features of the study area, and wind magnitude are related with the UHI effects. To appraise urban LST in tropical regions, remote sensing data-GIS integration would be effective. | ||||
| 16 | 2017 | Singh et al. [ | Landsat TM/OLI | Lucknow City, Central India | The changes in land use and the impact on UHI |
| Results |
Degraded ecological evaluation index in highly built-up spaces of the study area indicated the probable occurrence of undesirable eco-environmental conditions in these spaces. Over the study area, higher and lower temperatures were observed in respective densely built-up areas and green/water areas. In this study, LST was strongly correlated with NDVI and UTFVI. | ||||
| 17 | 2017 | Tran et al. [ | Landsat TM/ETM+/OLI | Inner city area of Hanoi, Viet Nam | The relationship between LST and vegetation, man-made features, and cropland |
| Results |
The relationship between LST and LULC is nonlinear. Urban context configuration affects UHI. | ||||
| 18 | 2018 | Sultana and Satyanarayana [ | Landsat ETM+ | 10 major metropolitan cities of India | The relationship between LULC changes and LST |
| Results |
Increasing number of complex UHIs existed over the Indian cities, between 2001 and 2013. Rise in built-up/urban spaces and dry/barren lands, and fall in areas covered with vegetation and green spaces result in higher UHI magnitudes. | ||||
| 19 | 2018 | Aboelnour and Engel [ | Landsat TM/OLI/TIRS | Greater Cairo Region, Egypt | The urban sprawl with respect to LST |
| Results |
Degraded green spaces, caused by rapid urbanization, may be the reason behind surface heat island and undesirable urban microclimates. LST could be calculated with the help of different emissivity models, with negligible variations. | ||||
| 20 | 2018 | Silva et al. [ | Landsat TM/OLI | Paço do Lumiar, Brazil | The influence of vegetation cover and fragmentation on the urban environment |
| Results |
Degraded green spaces along with densely built-up areas with increasing number of bulky man-made structures may increase the intensity UHI and thermal fluxes. | ||||
Figure 1Location map of the study area.
Details of the Landsat TM/OLI images.
| Date of Image | DSA * | Sensor | Flight Time (GMT) | Tma (°C) | Cloud Cover (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 July 1988 | 188 | TM | 06:07:52 | 27.4 | 0.00 |
| 10 July 2001 | 191 | TM | 06:17:36 | 27.7 | 0.00 |
| 6 July 2017 | 187 | OLI | 06:36:59 | 29 | 0.00 |
* DSA = Day of the year; and Tma = the average monthly temperature.
The overall accuracy of classified land cover.
| Year | Overall Accuracy | Kappa Coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 94% | 0.88 |
| 2001 | 97% | 0.96 |
| 2017 | 98% | 0.87 |
Figure 2Land cover classification, 1988, 2001 and 2017.
Figure 3Urban land and vegetation cover in 1988, 2001 and 2017.
The proportion of the urban land, vegetation cover and soil in the study area.
| Year | Urban (km2) | Vegetation (km2) | Soil (km2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 71.55 | 5.11% | 174.36 | 12.45% | 1153.90 | 82.43% |
| 2001 | 138.01 | 9.85% | 122.02 | 8.71% | 1139.77 | 81.42% |
| 2017 | 242.14 | 17.29% | 95.18 | 6.80% | 1062.48 | 75.90% |
Figure 4The changes of urban land and vegetation cover in the study area from 1988 to 2017.
Figure 5Land surface temperature (LST), normalized deference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference built-up index (NDBI) in 1988, 2001 and 2017.
Details of the calculation of LST, NDVI and NDBI in 1988, 2001 and 2017.
| Year | LST | NDVI | NDBI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| min | max | mean | min | max | mean | min | max | mean | |
| 1988 | 23.68274 | 46.66728 | 35.85415 | −0.02351 | 0.86358 | 0.32202 | −0.37117 | 0.40875 | 0.04971 |
| 2001 | 24.97311 | 48.84806 | 38.38122 | −0.14442 | 0.84903 | 0.24409 | −0.41739 | 0.51931 | 0.09307 |
| 2017 | 29.40610 | 51.41578 | 41.96666 | −0.88413 | 0.96426 | 0.21902 | −0.46967 | 0.32005 | −0.05193 |
Figure 62D and 3D scatterplots of the NDBI-LST and NDVI-LST relationships.
Details of the multiple linear regression model.
| Year | R | R Square | Std. Error of the Estimate | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient (Beta) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | 0.680 | 0.46 | 1.77 | Constant: 36.68 | NDVI: −0.25 |
| 2001 | 0.703 | 0.49 | 1.54 | Constant: 39.21 | NDVI: −0.26 |
| 2017 | 0.450 | 0.20 | 2.31 | Constant: 43.86 | NDVI: −0.29 |
The correlation of NDVI-LST and NDBI-LST relationships of previous case studies in various climate classes.
| No. | Study Area | Climate | Date of Study | NDVI-LST | NDBI-LST | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mumbai, India | Am | 2010 | profile (North) | R2 = 0.59 | R2 = 0.63 | [ |
| Profile (Central) | R2 = 0.32 | R2 = 0.68 | |||||
| profile (south) | R2 = 0.46 | R2 = 0.61 | |||||
| N–S Profile | R2 = 0.35 | R2 = 0.30 | |||||
| 2 | Langkawi Island, Kedah, Malaysia | Am | 2002 | R2 = 0.15 | R2 = 0.81 | [ | |
| 2015 | R2 = 0.5 | R2 = 0.84 | |||||
| 3 | Mumbai, India | Am | 2010 | R2 = 0.36 | - | [ | |
| Delhi, India | BSh | 2010 | R2 = 0.06 | - | |||
| 4 | Bangkok Metropolitan Administration | Aw-As | 2008 | R2 = 0.41 | R2 = 0.73 | [ | |
| 5 | Surat city | As-Aw | 1990 | R = −0.69 | R = 0.68 | [ | |
| 2009 | R = −0.86 | R = 0.87 | |||||
| 6 | Sukhbaatar | BSk-Dwb | 2000–2009 | R2 = 0.79 | - | [ | |
| Inget Tolgoi | BSk-Dwc | R2 = 0.97 | - | ||||
| Khutag-Undur | BSk-Dwb-Dwc | R2 = 0.84 | - | ||||
| Baruun-Urt | BSk | R2 = 0.78 | - | ||||
| Undurkhaan | BSk | R2 = 0.71 | - | ||||
| Khujirt | BSk | R2 = 0.91 | - | ||||
| Sainshand | BWk | R2 = 0.03 | - | ||||
| Mandalgobi | BWk | R2 = 0.5 | - | ||||
| Ehiingol | BWh | R2 = 0 | - | ||||
| Dalanzadgad | BWk | R2 = 0.02 | - | ||||
| 7 | Weigan and Kuqa river oasis, Xinjiang, China | BWk | 1989 | R2 = 0.51 | - | [ | |
| 2011 | R2 = 0.76 | - | |||||
| 8 | Erbil, Iraq | Csa-BSh | 2003–2014 | R2 = 0.18 | - | [ | |
| 9 | Florence | Csb | 2016 | R = −0.71 | R = 0.71 | [ | |
| Naples | Csb | 2016 | R = −0.57 | R = 0.61 | |||
| 10 | Pearl River Delta | Cwa | 2000 | R2 > 0.98 | R2 > 0.98 | [ | |
| 11 | shenzhen | Cwa | 2009–2010 | R2 > 0.72 | R2 > 0.51 | [ | |
| 12 | Hong Kong | Cwa | 2005 | R = −0.41 | R = 0.71 | [ | |
| 13 | Guangzhou, South China | Cwa-Cfa | 2000 | R2 = 0.05 | R2 = 0.78 | [ | |
| 2008 | R2 = 0.01 | R2 = 0.71 | |||||
| 14 | Guangzhou, South China | Cwa, Cfa | 1990 | R2 = 0.37 | R2 = 0.53 | [ | |
| 15 | Skopje, Macedonia | Cfa | 2013 | R = −0.63 | R = 0.67 | [ | |
| 2017 | R = −0.59 | R = 0.64 | |||||
| 16 | Upper-hill, Nairobi | Cfa | 1987 | R2 = 0.26 | - | [ | |
| 2002 | R2 = 0.49 | - | |||||
| 2015 | R2 = 0.48 | - | |||||
| 2017 | R2 = 0.16 | - | |||||
| 17 | Fuzhou City | Cfa or Csc | 1989 | R2 = 0.29 | R2 = 0.87 | [ | |
| 2001 | R2 = 0.07 | R2 = 0.74 | |||||
| 18 | Wuhan City | Cfa or Csc | R2 = 0.79 | - | [ | ||
| 19 | Shenyang, China | Dwa | 2001 | R = −0.07 | R = 0.91 | [ | |
| 2010 | R = −0.85 | R = 0.91 | |||||
| 20 | Chicago City, USA | Dfa | 2010 | R = −0.34 | R = 0.26 | [ | |
| 21 | Seven-county Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) of Minnesota. | Dfb | 2002 | R2 = 0.09 | - | [ | |
| 2002 | R2 = 0.05 | - | |||||
| 2000 | R2 = 0.02 | - | |||||
| 2001 | R2 = 0.11 | - | |||||
Figure 7Quantitative classification of the previous works studying NDVI-LST and NDBI-LST relationships.
Köppen climate classification scheme symbols description [52].
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
|---|---|---|
| A (Tropical) | f (Rainforest) | |
| m (Monsoon) | ||
| w (Savanna, Wet) | ||
| s (Savanna, Dry) | ||
| B (Arid) | W (Desert) | |
| S (Steppe) | ||
| h (Hot) | ||
| k (Cold) | ||
| C (Temperate) | s (Dry summer) | |
| w (Dry winter) | ||
| f (Without dry season) | ||
| a (Hot summer) | ||
| b (Warm summer) | ||
| c (Cold summer) | ||
| D (Cold (continental)) | s (Dry summer) | |
| w (Dry winter) | ||
| f (Without dry season) | ||
| a (Hot summer) | ||
| b (Warm summer) | ||
| c (Cold summer) | ||
| d (Very cold winter) |