| Literature DB >> 30678286 |
Guangzhen Cui1, Yanli Lu2, Wei Zhou3, Xuliang Lv4, Jiangnan Hu5, Guoyu Zhang6, Guangxin Gu7.
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles, such as Fe₃O₄ and Co₃O₄, play a vital role in the research on advanced microwave absorbing materials, even if problems such as high density and narrow band impedance matching are still unsolved. Herein, the study of lightweight hollowEntities:
Keywords: heterojunction; hollow Fe3O4; microwave absorption; solvothermal
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678286 PMCID: PMC6409544 DOI: 10.3390/nano9020141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the fabrication of the hollow Fe3O4@reduced graphite oxide (RGO) nanocomposites.
Figure 2X-ray diffractometer (XRD) pattern of hollow Fe3O4@RGO (a) and the magnified image of the (311) peak (b).
Figure 3X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of hollow Fe3O4@RGO (a), Fe2p spectrum (b), O1s spectrum (c), C1s spectrum (d).
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of hollow Fe3O4 (a); hollow Fe3O4@RGO (b–d); and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of hollow Fe3O4@RGO (e–h).
Figure 5Real part of the relative complex permittivity (a); imaginary part of the relative complex permittivity (b); electric loss tangents (c); real part of the relative complex permeability (d); imaginary part of the relative complex permeability (e); and magnetic loss tangents of the prepared composites (f).
Figure 6Three-dimensional (3D) presentations of reflection loss of the hollow Fe3O4 composite (a), hollow Fe3O4@0.5 g RGO composite (b), hollow Fe3O4@0.25 g RGO composite (c), and hollow Fe3O4@0.125 g RGO composite (d) at different thicknesses.
Figure 7The reflection loss (RL) frequency curves, the relationship between the simulation thickness and the peak frequency, and relationship between Z/Z0 and the electromagnetic (EM) wave frequency of the hollow Fe3O4@0.5 g RGO composites (a), hollow Fe3O4@0.25 g RGO composites (b), and hollow Fe3O4@0.125 g RGO composites (c).
Figure 8The C0-f curve of the hollow Fe3O4@RGO composite.
Microwave absorption performances of various Fe3O4 nanoparticles in previous reports compared with hollow Fe3O4@RGO composites.
| Sample | RL | Effective Bandwidth (GHz) (RL < 10 dB) | Thickness (mm) | Wt (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4/5 wt% CNTs | −51.3 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 50 | [ |
| RGO/Fe3O4/ZnO | −57.0 | 5 | 2 | 33 | [ |
| CNTs/Fe3O4/rGO/C | −54.43 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 20 | [ |
| graphene@Fe3O4@PANI@TiO2 | −41.8 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 50 | [ |
| graphene@Fe3O4@WO3@PANI | −46.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 30 | [ |
| Fe3O4/SiO2/graphene | −27.1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 50 | [ |
| RGO/CoFe2O4/MWCNT | −46.8 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 50 | [ |
| PANI/Fe3O4/RGO | −36.5 | 5 | 2.5 | 40 | [ |
| hollow Fe3O4@RGO | −41.89 | 4.2 | 2.5 | 50 | This work |