Literature DB >> 30677528

Pancreatic Cancer Lymph Node Resection Revisited: A Novel Calculation of Number of Lymph Nodes Required.

Amanda K Arrington1, Elinora T Price2, Kimberly Golisch2, Taylor S Riall2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer related deaths in the US. Although lymph node (LN) metastasis is a prognostic indicator, the extent of LN resection is still debated. Our goal was to use the distribution of the ratio of positive to negative LNs to derive a more adequate number of necessary examined LNs based on the target LN threshold (TLNT). STUDY
DESIGN: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective study of surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2010 to 2015). We evaluated the number of positive LNs and total LNs examined and the log of the ratio of positive LNs to negative LNs (LODDS). The distribution of LODDS was examined to determine a target LNs examined threshold sufficient to detect N1 disease. Using the LODDS distribution of N1 cases, target LNs examined threshold were calculated to encompass 90 of the N1 group distribution.
RESULTS: Of the total 24,038 resected patients included in this study, 26% underwent operation only, 18% received neoadjuvant therapy, and 56% underwent adjuvant therapy. In all, 8,144 (34%) patients had N0 disease and 15,894 (66%) had N1 disease. To capture 90% to 95% of the N1 group, the minimum number of LNs examined would be 18 (LODDS -2.74) to 24 (LODDS -3.04), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although previous studies have suggested 11 to 17 LNs required for adequate LN sampling in pancreatic cancer, our findings suggest that to capture 90% of cases with N1 disease, 18 LNs is more appropriate.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30677528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  6 in total

1.  Accurate Nodal Staging in Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Ding Ding; Erum Baig; Michael J Wright; Jonathan A Teinor; Daniyal Mansoor; Elizabeth Thompson; Ralph H Hruban; Amol Narang; William R Burns; Richard A Burkhart; Kelly Lafaro; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a better prognostic factor for oesophageal signet ring cell carcinoma than N stage.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; Feng-Wei Tan; Yu-Shun Gao; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yin Li; Xiang-Yang Yu; Hong Cheng; Chen-Guang Zhao; Ju-Wei Mu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  A greater lymph node yield is required during pathological examination in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhenghao Cai; Haiqin Song; Abe Fingerhut; Jing Sun; Junjun Ma; Luyang Zhang; Shuchun Li; Chaoran Yu; Minhua Zheng; Lu Zang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The prognostic relevance of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Claudia Zaharia; Marcus Roalsø; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 8.265

5.  Accuracy of Nodal Positivity in Inadequate Lymphadenectomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Population Study Using the US SEER Database.

Authors:  Weishen Wang; Ziyun Shen; Yusheng Shi; Siyi Zou; Ningzhen Fu; Yu Jiang; Zhiwei Xu; Hao Chen; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Prognostic impact of lymph node status in patients after total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A strobe-compliant study.

Authors:  Zhen-Jiang Zheng; Mo-Jin Wang; Chun-Lu Tan; Yong-Hua Chen; Jie Ping; Xu-Bao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.