Literature DB >> 30676995

Computational design of structured loops for new protein functions.

Kale Kundert1,2, Tanja Kortemme1,2,3.   

Abstract

The ability to engineer the precise geometries, fine-tuned energetics and subtle dynamics that are characteristic of functional proteins is a major unsolved challenge in the field of computational protein design. In natural proteins, functional sites exhibiting these properties often feature structured loops. However, unlike the elements of secondary structures that comprise idealized protein folds, structured loops have been difficult to design computationally. Addressing this shortcoming in a general way is a necessary first step towards the routine design of protein function. In this perspective, we will describe the progress that has been made on this problem and discuss how recent advances in the field of loop structure prediction can be harnessed and applied to the inverse problem of computational loop design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rosetta software; binding site design; loop modeling; positioning functional residues; protein design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30676995      PMCID: PMC6530579          DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Chem        ISSN: 1431-6730            Impact factor:   4.700


  118 in total

1.  The designability of protein structures.

Authors:  R Helling; H Li; R Mélin; J Miller; N Wingreen; C Zeng; C Tang
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Craig T Porter; Neera Borkakoti; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Role of the biomolecular energy gap in protein design, structure, and evolution.

Authors:  Sarel J Fleishman; David Baker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Control of protein signaling using a computationally designed GTPase/GEF orthogonal pair.

Authors:  Gregory T Kapp; Sen Liu; Amelie Stein; Derek T Wong; Attila Reményi; Brian J Yeh; James S Fraser; Jack Taunton; Wendell A Lim; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modeling protein conformational ensembles: from missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations.

Authors:  Amarda Shehu; Cecilia Clementi; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-10-01

6.  Shape complementarity and hydrogen bond preferences in protein-protein interfaces: implications for antibody modeling and protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  The coming of age of de novo protein design.

Authors:  Po-Ssu Huang; Scott E Boyken; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins.

Authors:  C Chothia; A M Lesk
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  AbDesign: An algorithm for combinatorial backbone design guided by natural conformations and sequences.

Authors:  Gideon D Lapidoth; Dror Baran; Gabriele M Pszolla; Christoffer Norn; Assaf Alon; Michael D Tyka; Sarel J Fleishman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-06-06

Review 10.  Conformational sampling in template-free protein loop structure modeling: an overview.

Authors:  Yaohang Li
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.271

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Rosetta flexible-backbone computational protein design methods on binding interactions.

Authors:  Amanda L Loshbaugh; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-10

2.  Comparison of the structure and function of a chimeric peptide modified titanium surface.

Authors:  Lei Gong; Hongjuan Geng; Xi Zhang; Ping Gao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Expanding the space of protein geometries by computational design of de novo fold families.

Authors:  Xingjie Pan; Michael C Thompson; Yang Zhang; Lin Liu; James S Fraser; Mark J S Kelly; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Accurate positioning of functional residues with robotics-inspired computational protein design.

Authors:  Cody Krivacic; Kale Kundert; Xingjie Pan; Roland A Pache; Lin Liu; Shane O Conchúir; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Jeffrey J Gray; Michael C Thompson; James S Fraser; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structural basis for peptide substrate specificities of glycosyltransferase GalNAc-T2.

Authors:  Sai Pooja Mahajan; Yashes Srinivasan; Jason W Labonte; Matthew P DeLisa; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 13.084

6.  New computational protein design methods for de novo small molecule binding sites.

Authors:  James E Lucas; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Extension of a de novo TIM barrel with a rationally designed secondary structure element.

Authors:  Jonas Gregor Wiese; Sooruban Shanmugaratnam; Birte Höcker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 6.725

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.