Literature DB >> 30676109

Cognitive Bias in Clinicians' Communication about Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.

Caitlin E Hansen1, Anna North2, Linda M Niccolai3.   

Abstract

National guidelines recommend human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for all 11-12-year-olds, but uptake among United States adolescents remains low. A major barrier to greater uptake is the lack of effective recommendations for HPV vaccine from clinicians. One potential influence on clinicians' recommendations for HPV vaccine that has been relatively unexplored is that of cognitive biases, or errors in judgement that result from 'mental shortcuts' used to make decisions under uncertainty. Therefore, we analyzed qualitative data from interviews with 32 pediatric clinicians using a framework of nine cognitive biases relevant to HPV vaccination: omission bias, ambiguity aversion, present bias, availability bias, optimism bias, naturalness bias, protected values, anchoring bias, and confirmation bias. We used a directed content analysis approach to iteratively code and analyze all transcripts in the dataset. We found evidence for several cognitive biases that were related to weaker recommendations for HPV vaccine. Commonly identified biases included anchoring bias (perception that vaccination unnecessary due to age/pubertal status); present bias (perception of burdens related to discussing vaccination), and optimism bias (belief that patient at low risk for HPV acquisition). We found less frequent evidence for ambiguity aversion (perception of missing information regarding vaccination) and omission bias (deferring vaccination). Other biases were identified infrequently or not at all. Our findings suggest that several cognitive biases may be an influence on clinicians' communication about HPV vaccine. Raising awareness of cognitive biases related to making HPV vaccine recommendations could help to strengthen the recommendations that clinicians provide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30676109      PMCID: PMC6733664          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1567439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  36 in total

1.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Role of Cognitive Bias in Suboptimal HPV Vaccine Uptake.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Melinda M Pettigrew
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Evidence of Cognitive Bias in Decision Making Around Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Qualitative Framework Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel D Matlock; Jacqueline Jones; Carolyn T Nowels; Amy Jenkins; Larry A Allen; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  Parents' Recall and Reflections on Experiences Related to HPV Vaccination for Their Children.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Caitlin E Hansen; Marisol Credle; Eugene D Shapiro
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  Vaccine administration decision making: the case of yellow fever vaccine.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; Lin H Chen; Mary E Wilson; Emily Sisson; Mark Gershman; Emad Yanni; Emily S Jentes; Natasha S Hochberg; Davidson H Hamer; Elizabeth D Barnett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Do decision biases predict bad decisions? Omission bias, naturalness bias, and influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Marco daCosta Dibonaventura; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Provider communication about HPV vaccination: A systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa B Gilkey; Annie-Laurie McRee
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines.

Authors:  John T Schiller; Xavier Castellsagué; Suzanne M Garland
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  "You're never really off time": Healthcare providers' interpretations of optimal timing for HPV vaccination.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; Leah Tuzzio; Melissa B Gilkey; Annie-Laurie McRee
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-05-16

Review 10.  Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Donald Redelmeier; Christian C Ruff; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding the Factors Influencing Health Care Provider Recommendations about Adolescent Vaccines: A Proposed Framework.

Authors:  Mallory K Ellingson; Robert A Bednarczyk; Sean T O'Leary; Jason L Schwartz; Eugene D Shapiro; Linda M Niccolai
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.