Literature DB >> 30676099

Nonresective treatments for uterine fibroids: a systematic review of uterine and fibroid volume reductions.

Melody Taheri1, Laura Galo2, Callum Potts2, Khaled Sakhel2, Stephen Derek Quinn1.   

Abstract

Patients are increasingly seeking uterus-preserving, minimally invasive treatments for symptomatic uterine fibroids. This has led to a greater use of nonresective treatments such as uterine artery embolization (UAE), focused ultrasound (FUS) and more recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of fibroids. This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, examines the change in uterine and fibroid volumes associated with UAE, FUS, and RFA. Pubmed and MedlinePlus databases were searched from 1956 to 2016. The keywords used were 'radiofrequency ablation,' 'magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound,' 'ultrasound guided focused ultrasound', 'uterine artery embolization,' 'uterine fibroid embolization,' and 'leiomyoma' or 'fibroid'. Publications with at least 20 patients were included. Data were collected and analyzed using Microsoft Excel® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) software. Eighty-one relevant papers were identified: 52 related to UAE, 11 to RFA, 17 to FUS, 1 compared UAE and FUS. We report the published uterine volume and fibroid volume changes seen in these studies at 1 to 36 months. The pooled fibroid volume reductions at six months seen with RFA were 70%, UAE 54% and FUS 32%. All three types of nonresective treatment result in fibroid volume reduction. However, fibroid volume reduction is most marked with RFA, with UAE resulting in the next most volume reduction. Additional larger cohort studies, including those that are randomized and/or comparative, would enable definitive conclusions. This is the first systematic review comparing uterine and fibroid volume reduction after RFA, UAE and MRgFUS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiofrequency ablation; fibroid; leiomyoma; magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound; ultrasound-guided focused ultrasound; uterine artery embolization; uterine fibroid embolization; volume

Year:  2019        PMID: 30676099     DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1564843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  2 in total

1.  Should Ultrasound-Guided High Frequency Focused Ultrasound Be Considered as an Alternative Non-Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids in Non-Asiatic Countries? An Opinion Paper.

Authors:  Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche; Sarah Rafiq; Rajesh Devassy; Hugo Christian Verhoeven; Sven Becker; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Comparison of two invasive non-surgical treatment options for uterine myomas: uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound-systematic review.

Authors:  Madina Yerezhepbayeva; Milan Terzic; Gulzhanat Aimagambetova; Byron Crape
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.