Caron Gan1,2, F Virginia Wright1,3. 1. a Bloorview Research Institute , Toronto , Ontario , Canada. 2. b Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital , Toronto , Ontario , Canada. 3. c Department of Physical Therapy , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To adapt the well-validated 37-item adult Family Needs Questionnaire to make it suitable for families of children and youth with acquired brain injury (ABI). METHODS: Measurement construction employed a modified Delphi technique to identify the most relevant content items for the pediatric Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ-P). The Delphi process involved a panel of 11 ABI-team clinicians and seven family caregivers of children/youth with an ABI and four rounds of anonymous voting on each item's importance. Qualitative responses related to each item's review were incorporated into item content and wording decisions. Cognitive interviews were conducted with three parents after the Delphi to evaluate face and content validity. RESULTS: The outcome of the final Delphi round was a set of 40 items within the original FNQ's original six categories: Health Information (n = 10), Emotional Support (n = 6), Instrumental Support (n = 4), Professional Support (n = 6), Community Support (n = 6), and Involvement with Care (n = 8). Cognitive interviews resulted in changes to formatting, rating scale, and item wording, and culminated in overall consensus about the FNQ-P's face/content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Delphi process with family and clinical partners resulted in content-endorsed pediatric FNQ that is ready for validation work prior to transfer to clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To adapt the well-validated 37-item adult Family Needs Questionnaire to make it suitable for families of children and youth with acquired brain injury (ABI). METHODS: Measurement construction employed a modified Delphi technique to identify the most relevant content items for the pediatric Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ-P). The Delphi process involved a panel of 11 ABI-team clinicians and seven family caregivers of children/youth with an ABI and four rounds of anonymous voting on each item's importance. Qualitative responses related to each item's review were incorporated into item content and wording decisions. Cognitive interviews were conducted with three parents after the Delphi to evaluate face and content validity. RESULTS: The outcome of the final Delphi round was a set of 40 items within the original FNQ's original six categories: Health Information (n = 10), Emotional Support (n = 6), Instrumental Support (n = 4), Professional Support (n = 6), Community Support (n = 6), and Involvement with Care (n = 8). Cognitive interviews resulted in changes to formatting, rating scale, and item wording, and culminated in overall consensus about the FNQ-P's face/content validity. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Delphi process with family and clinical partners resulted in content-endorsed pediatric FNQ that is ready for validation work prior to transfer to clinical practice.
Entities:
Keywords:
Family needs; acquired brain injury; children; families; pediatrics
Authors: Helene Lundgaard Soberg; Håkon Øgreid Moksnes; Nada Andelic; Audny Anke; Olav Røise; Cecilie Røe; Eline Aas; Unni Sveen; Christine Gaarder; Pål Aksel Næss; Eirik Helseth; Hilde Margrete Dahl; Frank Becker; Marianne Løvstad; Kristian Bartnes; Christoph Schäfer; Mari S Rasmussen; Paul Perrin; Juan Lu; Torgeir Hellstrøm Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-04-14