Frederique J Vanheusden1,2, Michael A Chesnaye1, David M Simpson1, Steven L Bell1. 1. a Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton , Southampton , UK. 2. b School of Science and Technology , Nottingham Trent University , Clifton Campus , Nottingham , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess hearing in response to speech, the envelope frequency following response (FFR) can be observed at the fundamental frequency of a vowel stimulus and its harmonics. FFRs are complex non-linear phenomena, which require better understanding for allowing robust inferences on the assessment of hearing and hearing aid fitting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of stimulus bandwidth on FFR detection rates using filtered vowel stimuli with equal sound levels. DESIGN: FFRs were collected whilst presenting repeated vowels (in consonant-vowel-consonant format) filtered into different bandwidths. Eighty stimuli per word were presented at 70 dB SPL LAeq through insert earphones with an inter-stimulus interval of 1 s. Responses were detected using frequency-domain Hotelling's T2 (HT2) tests for individual multiples of the fundamental frequency (F0) and for combinations of F0 multiples. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 11 native English-speaking subjects with normal hearing thresholds. RESULTS: Average detection rates are highest (69%) with stimuli high-pass filtered >1000 Hz, and significantly lower for low-pass filtered stimuli (40%). CONCLUSIONS: High-pass filtered vowels therefore appear to elicit stronger FFRs than low-pass filtered vowels at the same dB SPL LAeq. For testing hearing using band-limited speech, filtering effects (due to hearing loss, hearing aid setting or stimulus choice) on responses must be considered.
BACKGROUND: To assess hearing in response to speech, the envelope frequency following response (FFR) can be observed at the fundamental frequency of a vowel stimulus and its harmonics. FFRs are complex non-linear phenomena, which require better understanding for allowing robust inferences on the assessment of hearing and hearing aid fitting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of stimulus bandwidth on FFR detection rates using filtered vowel stimuli with equal sound levels. DESIGN: FFRs were collected whilst presenting repeated vowels (in consonant-vowel-consonant format) filtered into different bandwidths. Eighty stimuli per word were presented at 70 dB SPL LAeq through insert earphones with an inter-stimulus interval of 1 s. Responses were detected using frequency-domain Hotelling's T2 (HT2) tests for individual multiples of the fundamental frequency (F0) and for combinations of F0 multiples. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 11 native English-speaking subjects with normal hearing thresholds. RESULTS: Average detection rates are highest (69%) with stimuli high-pass filtered >1000 Hz, and significantly lower for low-pass filtered stimuli (40%). CONCLUSIONS: High-pass filtered vowels therefore appear to elicit stronger FFRs than low-pass filtered vowels at the same dB SPL LAeq. For testing hearing using band-limited speech, filtering effects (due to hearing loss, hearing aid setting or stimulus choice) on responses must be considered.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electrophysiology; Hotelling’s T; adult or general hearing screening; envelope frequency following responses; objective response detection; speech perception