Literature DB >> 30675721

Evolutionary pathways toward gigantism in sharks and rays.

Catalina Pimiento1,2,3, Juan L Cantalapiedra2,4, Kenshu Shimada5, Daniel J Field6, Jeroen B Smaers7.   

Abstract

Through elasmobranch (sharks and rays) evolutionary history, gigantism evolved multiple times in phylogenetically distant species, some of which are now extinct. Interestingly, the world's largest elasmobranchs display two specializations found never to overlap: filter feeding and mesothermy. The contrasting lifestyles of elasmobranch giants provide an ideal case study to elucidate the evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in the oceans. Here, we applied a phylogenetic approach to a global dataset of 459 taxa to study the evolution of elasmobranch gigantism. We found that filter feeders and mesotherms deviate from general relationships between trophic level and body size, and exhibit significantly larger sizes than ectothermic-macropredators. We confirm that filter feeding arose multiple times during the Paleogene, and suggest the possibility of a single origin of mesothermy in the Cretaceous. Together, our results elucidate two main evolutionary pathways that enable gigantism: mesothermic and filter feeding. These pathways were followed by ancestrally large clades and facilitated extreme sizes through specializations for enhancing prey intake. Although a negligible percentage of ectothermic-macropredators reach gigantic sizes, these species lack such specializations and are correspondingly constrained to the lower limits of gigantism. Importantly, the very adaptive strategies that enabled the evolution of the largest sharks can also confer high extinction susceptibility.
© 2019 The Author(s). Evolution © 2019 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body size; elasmobranchs; evolution; filter feeding; gigantism; mesothermy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30675721     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Heterogeneous relationships between rates of speciation and body size evolution across vertebrate clades.

Authors:  Christopher R Cooney; Gavin H Thomas
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  The evolution of mechanisms involved in vertebrate endothermy.

Authors:  Lucas J Legendre; Donald Davesne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Body dimensions of the extinct giant shark Otodus megalodon: a 2D reconstruction.

Authors:  Jack A Cooper; Catalina Pimiento; Humberto G Ferrón; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Micro-computed tomography imaging reveals the development of a unique tooth mineralization pattern in mackerel sharks (Chondrichthyes; Lamniformes) in deep time.

Authors:  Patrick L Jambura; René Kindlimann; Faviel López-Romero; Giuseppe Marramà; Cathrin Pfaff; Sebastian Stumpf; Julia Türtscher; Charlie J Underwood; David J Ward; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Articulated remains of the extinct shark Ptychodus (Elasmobranchii, Ptychodontidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain provide insights into gigantism, growth rate and life history of ptychodontid sharks.

Authors:  Patrick L Jambura; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biomechanical insights into the dentition of megatooth sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae).

Authors:  Antonio Ballell; Humberto G Ferrón
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The extinct shark Otodus megalodon was a transoceanic superpredator: Inferences from 3D modeling.

Authors:  Jack A Cooper; John R Hutchinson; David C Bernvi; Geremy Cliff; Rory P Wilson; Matt L Dicken; Jan Menzel; Stephen Wroe; Jeanette Pirlo; Catalina Pimiento
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 14.957

8.  Was the Devonian placoderm Titanichthys a suspension feeder?

Authors:  Samuel J Coatham; Jakob Vinther; Emily J Rayfield; Christian Klug
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.