| Literature DB >> 30675123 |
Young-Hwa Hwang1, Ishamri Ismail2, Seon-Tea Joo1,2.
Abstract
To investigate relationships of electronic taste-traits with muscle fiber type composition (FTC) and contents of nucleotides, porcine longissimus lumborum (LL), psoas major (PM), and infra spinam (IS) muscles were obtained from eight castrated LYD pigs. FTC and taste-traits in these three porcine muscles were measured by histochemical analysis and electronic tongue system, respectively. IS had significantly higher proportion of type I fibers while LL had significantly higher proportion of type IIB than other muscles (p<0.05). IS had the highest inosine monophosphate (IMP) content while LL had the lowest IMP content (p<0.05). In contrast, LL had significantly higher hypoxanthine content compared to PM and IS (both p<0.05). For taste-traits, IS had significantly higher umami and richness values but lower sourness value than LL and PM (p<0.05). Sourness and astringency values of LL were significantly higher than those of IS (p<0.05). The proportion of type IIB fiber was positively correlated with sourness and astringency but negatively correlated with saltiness. These results suggest that sourness and astringency tastes are increased with increasing proportions of type IIB fibers in porcine muscles due to increase of hypoxanthine content. These results also imply that umami and richness tastes are increased with increasing contents of type I and IIA fibers because of increased IMP content in porcine muscles.Entities:
Keywords: electronic taste-traits; electronic tongue system; fiber type composition; nucleotide compounds; pork taste
Year: 2018 PMID: 30675123 PMCID: PMC6335132 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.e66
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Differences in fiber type composition among three porcine muscles
| Porcine muscles | Fiber type composition (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | Type IIA | Type IIB | |
| 5.76±0.78C | 4.76±1.00B | 89.48±0.93A | |
| 9.63±1.61B | 20.46±2.10A | 69.91±3.28B | |
| 51.06±2.86A | 20.24±2.74A | 28.70±2.20C | |
All values are presented as means±SE (n=8).
Different superscripts in the same column (A–C) indicate significant difference (p<0.05).
Differences in meat quality measurements among three porcine muscles
| Variables | Muscles | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LL | PM | IS | |
| Meat color CIE L* | 49.52±0.78A | 45.14±1.02B | 44.11±0.59B |
| CIE a* | 6.72±0.41B | 14.39±0.55A | 13.97±0.66A |
| CIE b* | 1.11±0.23B | 2.57±0.41A | 3.08±0.30A |
| Released water (%) | 10.47±1.30A | 7.00±0.95B | 5.85±0.93B |
| Cooking loss (%) | 22.28±2.20 | 20.72±2.10 | 20.21±1.83 |
| WBSF (kg/cm2) | 4.08±0.21B | 3.55±0.11C | 5.01±0.16A |
All values are presented as means±SE (n=8).
Different superscripts in the same row (A–C) indicate significant difference (p<0.05).
LL, M. longissimus lumborum; PM, M. psoas major; IS, M. infra spinam; WBSF, Warner-Bratzler shear force.
Fig. 1Contents of nucleotide compounds (mg/100 g muscle) in porcine M. longissimus lumborum (LL), M. psoas major (PM), and M. infra spinam (IS) at 48 h postmortem;
Different letters in bars among muscle samples indicate significant differences (p<0.05).
Fig. 2Relative changes in taste-traits of three porcine muscles from baseline in SPT solution.
LL, M. longissimus lumborum; PM, M. psoas major; IS, M. infra spinam; SPT, standard pork taste. Different letters in bars indicate significant differences (p<0.05) of taste-traits among muscles within the box.
Correlation coefficients (r) of electronic taste-traits with fiber type composition and contents of nucleotides in porcine muscles
| Sourness | Bitterness | Astringency | Umami | Richness | Saltiness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle fiber | ||||||
| Type I | –0.58[ | 0.16 | –0.48[ | 0.59[ | 0.87[ | 0.61[ |
| Type IIA | –0.35 | 0.11 | –0.30 | 0.46[ | 0.51[ | 0.68[ |
| Type IIB | 0.57[ | –0.17 | 0.48[ | –0.62[ | –0.85[ | –0.69[ |
| Nucleotides | ||||||
| ATP | –0.67[ | –0.38 | –0.42[ | 0.69[ | 0.60[ | 0.26 |
| ADP | –0.19 | 0.18 | –0.21 | 0.20 | 0.59[ | 0.27 |
| AMP | –0.05 | –0.23 | 0.21 | –0.03 | –0.02 | –0.33 |
| IMP | –0.50[ | 0.13 | –0.44[ | 0.54[ | 0.74[ | 0.69[ |
| Inosine | 0.24 | –0.12 | 0.47[ | –0.35 | –0.54[ | –0.30 |
| Hypoxanthine | 0.54[ | –0.06 | 0.41[ | –0.55[ | –0.69[ | –0.63[ |
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
*** p<0.001.