Literature DB >> 30674360

Effects of neurofeedback on the dysregulation profile in children with ADHD: SCP NF meets SDQ-DP - a retrospective analysis.

Hartmut Heinrich1,2,3, Holger Gevensleben4, Andreas Becker4, Aribert Rothenberger4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) usually show psychopathological signs beyond their core symptoms (e.g. elevated scores of the dysregulation profile (DP) in 30-40%), treatments with a broader approach to self-regulation skills may be supportive. Neurofeedback (NF) may reflect such an option. Aim of the present analysis was to compare the effects of slow cortical potential (SCP) NF and θ/β NF on the DP using data from a previous trial.
METHODS: Thirty children with ADHD (aged 8-12 years) and a DP score in the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-DP) ⩾ 3 were included. NF treatment consisted of one block of SCP NF and one block of θ/β NF (18 units per block) allowing an intraindividual comparison. Effects of the NF protocols were also contrasted to a control group (n = 18) that completed an attention skills training (between-group analysis).
RESULTS: Regarding the SDQ-DP, SCP NF was superior to θ/β NF and the control condition. Effects of SCP NF and θ/β NF on ADHD symptom severity were not significantly different. The SDQ-DP score did not correlate with EEG-related measures previously found to be predictors for SCP NF on ADHD symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: SCP NF may reflect a more general approach to improve cognitive, emotional and behavioral self-regulation skills. If confirmed in a larger sample, the SDQ-DP score could be used as an indication criterion and contribute to the individualization of NF in ADHD. Overall, the differential effect provides further evidence for the specificity of NF effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ); dysregulation profile; neurofeedback; slow cortical potentials (SCPs)

Year:  2019        PMID: 30674360     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718004130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  3 in total

1.  How standardized are "standard protocols"? Variations in protocol and performance evaluation for slow cortical potential neurofeedback: A systematic review.

Authors:  John Hasslinger; Micaela Meregalli; Sven Bölte
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Digital Interventions for Emotion Regulation in Children and Early Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally Reynard; Joao Dias; Marija Mitic; Beate Schrank; Kate Anne Woodcock
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.364

3.  Yes, I can - maybe … Effects of placebo-related instructions on neuroregulation in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Holger Gevensleben; David Schmiedeke; Hartmut Heinrich; Aribert Rothenberger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.