Literature DB >> 30674064

Conductive electrospun scaffolds with electrical stimulation for neural differentiation of conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells.

Ali Rahmani1, Samad Nadri1,2,3,4, Habib Sayed Kazemi5, Yousef Mortazavi4,6, Mahdi Sojoodi7.   

Abstract

An electrical stimulus is a new approach to neural differentiation of stem cells. In this work, the neural differentiation of conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells (CJMSCs) on a new 3D conductive fibrous scaffold of silk fibroin (SF) and reduced graphene oxide (rGo) were examined. rGo (3.5% w/w) was dispersed in SF-acid formic solution (10% w/v) and conductive nanofibrous scaffold was fabricated using the electrospinning method. SEM and TEM microscopies were used for fibrous scaffold characterization. CJMSCs were cultured on the scaffold and 2 electrical impulse models (Current 1:115 V/m, 100-Hz frequency and current 2:115 v/m voltages, 0.1-Hz frequency) were applied for 7 days. Also, the effect of the fibrous scaffold and electrical impulses on cell viability and neural gene expression were examined using MTT assay and qPCR analysis. Fibrous scaffold with the 220 ± 20 nm diameter and good dispersion of graphene nanosheets at the surface of nanofibers were fabricated. The MTT result showed the viability of cells on the scaffold, with current 2 lower than current 1. qPCR analysis confirmed that the expression of β-tubulin (2.4-fold P ≤ 0.026), MAP-2 (1.48-fold; P ≤ 0.03), and nestin (1.5-fold; P ≤ 0.03) genes were higher in CJMSCs on conductive scaffold with 100-Hz frequency compared to 0.1-Hz frequency. Collectively, we proposed that SF-rGo fibrous scaffolds, as a new conductive fibrous scaffold with electrical stimulation are good strategies for neural differentiation of stem cells and the type of electrical pulses has an influence on neural differentiation and proliferation of CJMSCs.
© 2019 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conductive electrospun scaffolds; Conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells; Electrical stimulation; Neural differentiation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30674064     DOI: 10.1111/aor.13425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  5 in total

Review 1.  Engineering Tissues of the Central Nervous System: Interfacing Conductive Biomaterials with Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Rebecca D Bierman-Duquette; Gevick Safarians; Joyce Huang; Bushra Rajput; Jessica Y Chen; Ze Zhong Wang; Stephanie K Seidlits
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  Interaction of Neural Stem Cells (NSCs) and Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) as a Promising Approach in Brain Study and Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kaminska; Klaudia Radoszkiewicz; Paulina Rybkowska; Aleksandra Wedzinska; Anna Sarnowska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering treatments.

Authors:  Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; John Howard Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation Promotes Stem Cell Neural Differentiation in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Hong Cheng; Yan Huang; Hangqi Yue; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 5.  Conductive Electrospun Nanofiber Mats.

Authors:  Tomasz Blachowicz; Andrea Ehrmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.