Aurélien Dupré1,2, Robert P Jones3,4, Rafael Diaz-Nieto3, Stephen W Fenwick3, Graeme J Poston3, Hassan Z Malik3. 1. Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. aurelien.dupre@lyon.unicancer.fr. 2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France. aurelien.dupre@lyon.unicancer.fr. 3. Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK. 4. Institute of Translational Medicine, School of Cancer Studies, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been identified as potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in primary colorectal cancer, and there is a growing interest in their use in colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). However, optimal cut-off values for these ratios have not been defined by making comparison between series difficult. This study aimed to confirm the prognostic value of inflammatory scores in patients undergoing resection for CLM. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 376 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for CLM between June 2010 and August 2015. We assessed the reproducibility of previously published ratios and determined new cut-off values using the Cut-off Finder web-based tool. Relations between cut-off values and OS were analysed with Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-three patients had full preoperative blood tests for calculation of NLR, PLR and LMR. The number of cut-off values which showed a significant discrimination for OS was 49/249 (19.7%) for NLR, 28/316 (8.9%) for PLR and 22/214 (10.3%) for LMR, all with a scattered nonlinear distribution. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that inflammatory scores expressed as ratios do not seem to be consistently reliable prognostic markers in patients with resectable CLM.
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been identified as potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in primary colorectal cancer, and there is a growing interest in their use in colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). However, optimal cut-off values for these ratios have not been defined by making comparison between series difficult. This study aimed to confirm the prognostic value of inflammatory scores in patients undergoing resection for CLM. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 376 consecutive patients who underwent liver surgery for CLM between June 2010 and August 2015. We assessed the reproducibility of previously published ratios and determined new cut-off values using the Cut-off Finder web-based tool. Relations between cut-off values and OS were analysed with Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-three patients had full preoperative blood tests for calculation of NLR, PLR and LMR. The number of cut-off values which showed a significant discrimination for OS was 49/249 (19.7%) for NLR, 28/316 (8.9%) for PLR and 22/214 (10.3%) for LMR, all with a scattered nonlinear distribution. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that inflammatory scores expressed as ratios do not seem to be consistently reliable prognostic markers in patients with resectable CLM.
Authors: Bernard Nordlinger; Halfdan Sorbye; Bengt Glimelius; Graeme J Poston; Peter M Schlag; Philippe Rougier; Wolf O Bechstein; John N Primrose; Euan T Walpole; Meg Finch-Jones; Daniel Jaeck; Darius Mirza; Rowan W Parks; Murielle Mauer; Erik Tanis; Eric Van Cutsem; Werner Scheithauer; Thomas Gruenberger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Kyriakos Neofytou; Elizabeth C Smyth; Alexandros Giakoustidis; Aamir Z Khan; David Cunningham; Satvinder Mudan Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-09-14 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: C Cremolini; F Loupakis; G Masi; S Lonardi; C Granetto; M L Mancini; S Chiara; R Moretto; D Rossini; S Vitello; G Allegrini; G Tonini; F Bergamo; G Tomasello; M Ronzoni; A Buonadonna; S Bustreo; C Barbara; L Boni; A Falcone Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M J Proctor; D S Morrison; D Talwar; S M Balmer; D S J O'Reilly; A K Foulis; P G Horgan; D C McMillan Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jan Budczies; Frederick Klauschen; Bruno V Sinn; Balázs Győrffy; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Carsten Denkert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph C Y Chan; David L Chan; Connie I Diakos; Alexander Engel; Nick Pavlakis; Anthony Gill; Stephen J Clarke Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 12.969