| Literature DB >> 30673361 |
Camila D Ritter1, Sibylle Häggqvist2, Dave Karlsson3, Ilari E Sääksjärvi4, A Muthama Muasya5, R Henrik Nilsson6,7, Alexandre Antonelli6,7,8.
Abstract
The rapid loss of biodiversity, coupled with difficulties in species identification, call for innovative approaches to assess biodiversity. Insects make up a substantial proportion of extant diversity and play fundamental roles in any given ecosystem. To complement morphological species identification, new techniques such as metabarcoding make it possible to quantify insect diversity and insect-ecosystem interactions through DNA sequencing. Here we examine the potential of bulk insect samples (i.e., containing many non-sorted specimens) to assess prokaryote and eukaryote biodiversity and to complement the taxonomic coverage of soil samples. We sampled 25 sites on three continents and in various ecosystems, collecting insects with SLAM traps (Brazil) and Malaise traps (South Africa and Sweden). We then compared our diversity estimates with the results obtained with biodiversity data from soil samples from the same localities. We found a largely different taxonomic composition between the soil and insect samples, testifying to the potential of bulk insect samples to complement soil samples. Finally, we found that non-destructive DNA extraction protocols, which preserve insect specimens for morphological studies, constitute a promising choice for cost-effective biodiversity assessments. We propose that the sampling and sequencing of insect samples should become a standard complement for biodiversity studies based on environmental DNA.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA; 18S rDNA; ADN environnemental; ADNr 16S; ADNr 18S; COI ADNmt; COI mtDNA; environmental DNA; metabarcoding; métacodage à barres; non-destructive DNA extraction; protocole d’extraction d’ADN non-destructif
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30673361 DOI: 10.1139/gen-2018-0096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome ISSN: 0831-2796 Impact factor: 2.166