Literature DB >> 30673125

Motor units as tools to evaluate profile of human Renshaw inhibition.

Mustafa Görkem Özyurt1, Maria Piotrkiewicz2, Betilay Topkara1, Hans-Werner Weisskircher3, Kemal Sitki Türker1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: To uncover the synaptic profile of Renshaw inhibition on motoneurons, we stimulated thick motor axons and recorded from voluntarily-activated motor units. Stimuli generated a direct motor response on the whole muscle and an inhibitory response in active motor units. We have estimated the profile of Renshaw inhibition indirectly using the response of motor unit discharge rates to the stimulus. We have put forward a method of extrapolation that may be used to determine genuine synaptic potentials as they develop on motoneurons. These optimized techniques can be used in research and in clinics to fully appreciate Renshaw cell function in various neurological disorders. ABSTRACT: Although Renshaw inhibition (RI) has been extensively studied for decades, its precise role in motor control is yet to be discovered. One of the main handicaps is a lack of reliable methods for studying RI in conscious human subjects. We stimulated the lowest electrical threshold motor axons (thickest axons) in the tibial nerve and analysed the stimulus-correlated changes in discharge of voluntarily recruited low-threshold single motor units (SMUs) from the soleus muscle. In total, 54 distinct SMUs from 12 subjects were analysed. Stimuli that generated only the direct motor response (M-only) on surface electromyography induced an inhibitory response in the low-threshold SMUs. Because the properties of RI had to be estimated indirectly using the background discharge rate of SMUs, its profile varied with the discharge rate of the SMU. The duration of RI was found to be inversely proportional to the discharge rate of SMUs. Using this important finding, we have developed a method of extrapolation for estimating RI as it develops on motoneurons in the spinal cord. The frequency methods indicated that the duration of RI was between 30 and 40 ms depending on the background firing rate of the units, and the extrapolation indicated that RI on silent motoneurons was ∼55 ms. The present study establishes a novel methodology for studying RI in human subjects and hence may serve as a tool for improving our understanding of the involvement of RI in human motor control.
© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2019 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Renshaw circuitry; direct motor response; human neuronal networks; single motor units; synaptic potentials

Year:  2019        PMID: 30673125      PMCID: PMC6462458          DOI: 10.1113/JP277129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  54 in total

1.  Effects of large excitatory and inhibitory inputs on motoneuron discharge rate and probability.

Authors:  K S Türker; R K Powers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for recurrent inhibition by motoneurons in human subjects.

Authors:  E Pierrot-Deseilligny; B Bussel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor-axon collaterals to motoneurones.

Authors:  J C ECCLES; P FATT; K KOKETSU
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-12-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Recurrent inhibition of wrist extensor motoneurones: a single unit study on a deafferented patient.

Authors:  Benjamin Mattei; Annie Schmied; Jean-Pierre Vedel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  The monosynaptic reflex: a tool to investigate motor control in humans. Interest and limits.

Authors:  E Pierrot-Deseilligny; D Mazevet
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 6.  Spinal interneurones; how can studies in animals contribute to the understanding of spinal interneuronal systems in man?

Authors:  E Jankowska; I Hammar
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-10

7.  Estimation of postsynaptic potentials in rat hypoglossal motoneurones: insights for human work.

Authors:  K S Türker; R K Powers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Effect of chemically activated fine muscle afferents on spinal recurrent inhibition in humans.

Authors:  A Rossi; R Mazzocchio; B Decchi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Depolarization of Ib afferent axons in the cat spinal cord during homonymous muscle contraction.

Authors:  J Lafleur; D Zytnicki; G Horcholle-Bossavit; L Jami
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Recurrent facilitation of spinal reflexes.

Authors:  V J WILSON
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1959-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  5 in total

1.  A motor physiology recurrent topic: simplify assumptions to gain extra insight.

Authors:  Francisco J Alvarez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Quadriceps muscle stimulation evokes heteronymous inhibition onto soleus with limited Ia activation compared to femoral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Mark A Lyle; Cristian Cuadra; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  The Functional Role of Spinal Interneurons Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Mohammad-Masoud Zavvarian; James Hong; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined.

Authors:  Mustafa Görkem Özyurt; Heidi Haavik; Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard; Betilay Topkara; Beatrice Selen Şenocak; Mehmet Berke Göztepe; Imran Khan Niazi; Kemal Sitki Türker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatial and Temporal Arrangement of Recurrent Inhibition in the Primate Upper Limb.

Authors:  Steve A Edgley; Elizabeth R Williams; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.