Hui Liang1, Zhuorong Li2, Haibo Lin2, Junwei Chen2. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Second People's Hospital of Jiangmen, Jiangmen 529000, Guangdong Province, China. 2. Department of Rehabilitation, Wuyi TCM Hospital of Jiangmen, the Affiliated TCM Hospital of Jinan University, Jiangmen 529000, Guangdong Province.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with peripheral facial paralysis were randomly divided into a methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture group (a combined group), a methycobal iontophoresis group and a simple balance acupuncture group, 36 cases in each one. Basic medical treatment were given in the three groups. The simple balance acupuncture was applied at contralateral lumbago acupoint, rhinitis acupoint, stomachache acupoint in the simple balance acupuncture group. Methycobal through iontophoresis anodic introduction therapy was given in the methycobal iontophoresis group. On the basic treatment of methycobal iontophoresis, in the combined group, acupuncture was supplied at contralateral lumbago acupoint, rhinitis acupoint and stomachache acupoint. The treatment in all groups was given once a day, for 2 weeks. The House-Brackmann grading scale and the modified portmann score (RPA) method were used to observe the degree of nerve function and facial paralysis before and after treatment, and the clinical efficacy of each group was evaluated. RESULTS: The total effective rate of the combined group was 97.2% (35/36), which was higher than 83.3% (30/36) in the methycobal iontophoresis group and 88.9% (32/36) in the simple balance acupuncture group (all P<0.05). After treatment, the H-B classification of the combined group was significantly different from those of the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (both P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (P>0.05). The RPA score of the combined group was higher than those in the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (both P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the RPA score between the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with methycobal iontophoresis and simple balance acupuncture therapy, methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture therapy can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and signs of peripheral facial paralysis.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture in the treatment of peripheral facial paralysis. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with peripheral facial paralysis were randomly divided into a methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture group (a combined group), a methycobal iontophoresis group and a simple balance acupuncture group, 36 cases in each one. Basic medical treatment were given in the three groups. The simple balance acupuncture was applied at contralateral lumbago acupoint, rhinitis acupoint, stomachache acupoint in the simple balance acupuncture group. Methycobal through iontophoresis anodic introduction therapy was given in the methycobal iontophoresis group. On the basic treatment of methycobal iontophoresis, in the combined group, acupuncture was supplied at contralateral lumbago acupoint, rhinitis acupoint and stomachache acupoint. The treatment in all groups was given once a day, for 2 weeks. The House-Brackmann grading scale and the modified portmann score (RPA) method were used to observe the degree of nerve function and facial paralysis before and after treatment, and the clinical efficacy of each group was evaluated. RESULTS: The total effective rate of the combined group was 97.2% (35/36), which was higher than 83.3% (30/36) in the methycobal iontophoresis group and 88.9% (32/36) in the simple balance acupuncture group (all P<0.05). After treatment, the H-B classification of the combined group was significantly different from those of the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (both P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (P>0.05). The RPA score of the combined group was higher than those in the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (both P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the RPA score between the methycobal iontophoresis group and simple balance acupuncture group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with methycobal iontophoresis and simple balance acupuncture therapy, methycobal iontophoresis combined with balance acupuncture therapy can effectively improve the clinical symptoms and signs of peripheral facial paralysis.