Literature DB >> 3067210

Age-related changes in contrast sensitivity in central and peripheral retina.

B Crassini1, B Brown, K Bowman.   

Abstract

Eight young (average age 20.4 years) and eight elderly (average age 64.4 years) observers took part in three experiments designed to study age-related changes in peripheral retinal function. A further eight young (average age 22.3 years) and eight elderly (average age 63.8 years) observers took part in a replication of experiment 3. All observers had normal or better-than-normal visual acuity and no evidence of ocular pathology. All testing was monocular and the eye with better visual acuity was used. In the first experiment contrast sensitivity was measured in central retina and 10 deg temporally, at spatial frequencies of 0.2, 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 cycles deg-1. Young observers had better contrast sensitivities than older observers, but only at higher spatial frequencies (2.0 and 5.0 cycles deg-1). For both groups, contrast sensitivity was poorer with peripheral presentation of stimuli than with central presentation, but not for the lowest spatial frequency used (0.2 cycle deg-1). In the second experiment observers had to detect the presence of a sharp edge (square-wave luminance profile), while in the third and fourth experiments the target was a "fuzzy' edge (sine-wave profile). Edges were again presented centrally or 10 deg temporally. As expected from the data of experiment 1, young observers were better able to detect the sharp edge than were the older observers in both central and peripheral viewing conditions. For both age groups, edge detection was better during central viewing than during peripheral viewing. However, contrary to expectations based on the results of experiment 1, detection of the fuzzy edge was better for central than for peripheral viewing for both age groups in experiments 3 and 4. The apparent (and expected) equality of performance found in experiment 3 for young and elderly observers in detecting the fuzzy edge was shown to be due to the range of contrast values used. When appropriate contrast values were used in experiment 4, young observers detected fuzzy edges presented in central retina better than did elderly observers. The results of experiment 1 show sparing of the ability to process low spatial frequencies across (i) age and (ii) retinal location, and are discussed in terms of the notion of (i) models of age-related loss of visual function and (ii) cortical magnification. The results of experiments 2, 3, and 4 provide some support for the proposition that the contrast sensitivity of observers may be used to predict their performance on other visual tasks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3067210     DOI: 10.1068/p170315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  28 in total

1.  The "risky" reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Age-related changes in contrast gain related to the M and P pathways.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Mediating Age-related Cognitive Decline through Lifestyle Activities: A Brief Review of the Effects of Physical Exercise and Sports-playing on Older Adult Cognition.

Authors:  Inga Sogaard; Rui Ni
Journal:  Acta Psychopathol (Wilmington)       Date:  2018-09-29

5.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Premnandhini Satgunam; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Optimization of perceptual learning: effects of task difficulty and external noise in older adults.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Takeo Watanabe; George J Andersen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Russell S Pierce; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26

9.  Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Aging of low and high level vision: from chromatic and achromatic contrast sensitivity to local and 3D object motion perception.

Authors:  Catarina Mateus; Raquel Lemos; Maria Fátima Silva; Aldina Reis; Pedro Fonseca; Bárbara Oliveiros; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.