| Literature DB >> 30671464 |
Edward Ntim Gasu1,2, Hubert Senanu Ahor1, Lawrence Sheringham Borquaye1,2.
Abstract
Increasing reports of infectious diseases worldwide have become a global concern in recent times. Depleted antibiotic pipelines, rapid and complex cases of antimicrobial resistance, and emergence and re-emergence of infectious disease have necessitated an urgent need for the development of new antimicrobial therapeutics, preferably with novel modes of action. Due to their distinct mode of action, antimicrobial peptides offer an interesting alternative to conventional antibiotics to deal with the problems enumerated. In this study, the antimicrobial potential of the peptide extract from the marine mollusc, Olivancillaria hiatula, was evaluated in vitro. Agar diffusion and broth dilution techniques were used to evaluate microbial susceptibility to the peptide extract. Microplate-based assays were also used to investigate time-dependent growth inhibition profiles of microbes in the presence of peptide and evaluate the peptide's ability to modulate the activities of standard antibiotics. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were inhibited by the peptide extract in the agar diffusion assay. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of peptide against test microorganisms was between 0.039 and 2.5 mg/mL. At the MIC, the peptide extract was bacteriostatic towards all tested microorganisms but bactericidal to Staphylococcus aureus. In the presence of the peptide extract, a prolonged lag phase was observed for all microbes, similar to standard ciprofloxacin. When administered together, peptide extracts enhanced the activities of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime and were antagonistic towards erythromycin but indifferent towards metronidazole. Taken together, these results show the broad-spectrum antibacterial activity of peptide extract from Olivancillaria hiatula and demonstrate that antimicrobial peptides can be employed in combination with some conventional antibiotics for improved effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30671464 PMCID: PMC6323461 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6010572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Fourier Transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of peptide extract of Olivancillaria hiatula. Amides A&B bands spans 3100–3500 cm−1, Amide I band is from 1600 to 1700cm−1, Amide II band is from 1480 to 1600 cm−1, and the region from 500 to 1300 cm−1 represents Amides III–VI bands [26, 27].
Zones of inhibition (mm) of peptide extract against test microorganisms.
| Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microorganism (Gram status) | Peptide Extract | Positive control Cipro (1mg/ml) | Negative control |
|
| 30.9 ± 0.2 | 51.5 ± 1.3 | - |
|
| 28.9 ± 0.8 | 48.8 ± 1.2 | - |
|
| 27.4 ± 0.5 | 25.0 ± 6.1 | - |
|
| 12.1 ± 0.6 | 41.0 ± 0.2 | - |
|
| 31.0 ± 0.4 | 40.0 ± 0.8 | - |
|
| 30.0 ± 0.7 | 40.3 ± 0.6 | - |
|
| 27.0 ± 0.7 | 53.3 ± 0.9 | - |
|
| 28.5 ± 2.1 | 39.2 ± 0.9 | - |
|
| 33.2 ± 3.0 | 46.5 ± 1.9 | - |
Values reported as mean ± standard deviation of three replicate experiments; ∗ and # activity at 10 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL, respectively (ZI not observed at 5mg/mL); negative control (25 % ACN in 0.1 % TFA).
MIC, MBC, bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of peptide extract.
| Microorganism | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | MBC/MIC | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.625 | >2.5 | >4 | static |
|
| 1.25 | >2.5 | >2 | static |
|
| 0.625 | 2.5 | 4 | static |
|
| 0.039 | >2.5 | >4 | static |
|
| 0.156 | 2.5 | >4 | static |
|
| 0.315 | 2.5 | >4 | static |
|
| 0.039 | 1.25 | >4 | static |
|
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 1 | cidal |
|
| 2.5 | >2.5 | >1 | Cidal / static |
MIC and MBC experiments were replicated thrice; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration; MBC/MIC ≤ 2 implies bactericidal; MBC/MIC ≥ 4 implies bacteriostatic [25].
Figure 2Growth curves of test microorganisms in the presence of varying concentrations of peptide extract. Each data point is the average of 3 replicate experiments (MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; GC, growth control).
Figure 3Growth curves of test microorganisms in the presence of varying concentrations of standard ciprofloxacin drug. Each data point is the average of 3 replicate experiments (MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; GC, growth control).
Co-modulation studies: MICs of ciprofloxacin plus 20 μg/mL of peptide extract.
| Organism | MIC ( | MF | Change in MIC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cip | Cip + P | |||
|
| 1.95 | 0.00095 | 2053 | 99.95 |
|
| 0.00095 | 0.00012 | 8 | 87.50 |
|
| 125.00 | 0.00763 | 16383 | 99.99 |
|
| 0.00048 | 0.00003 | 16 | 50.00 |
|
| 125.00 | 62.5 | 2 | 50.00 |
|
| 3.91 | 0.00095 | 4116 | 99.98 |
|
| 0.24 | 0.00191 | 126 | 99.99 |
|
| 15.63 | 1.95 | 8 | 87.50 |
|
| 0.24 | 0.0038 | 64 | 98.44 |
MIC experiments were replicated thrice; change in MIC computed using equation (2).
MF: modulation factor, Cip: ciprofloxacin, P: peptide extract, and R: reduction in MIC
Co-modulation studies: MICs of Cefotaxime plus 20 μg/mL of peptide extract.
| Organism | MIC ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cef | Cef + P | MF | Change in MIC (%) | |
|
| 31.25 | 1.95 | 16 | 93.75 |
|
| 31.25 | 3.91 | 8 | 87.50 |
|
| 62.5 | 3.91 | 16 | 93.75 |
|
| 31.25 | 0.24 | 130 | 99.22 |
|
| 31.25 | 62.50 | 0.5 | 100.00 |
|
| 62.5 | 1.19 × 10−4 | 525210 | 99.99 |
|
| 31.25 | 1.19× 10−4 | 262605 | 100.00 |
|
| 250.00 | >250.00 | <1 | 100.00 |
|
| 31.25 | 1.95 | 16 | 93.75 |
MIC experiments were replicated thrice; change in MIC computed using equation (2).
MF: modulation factor, Cef: cefotaxime, P: peptide extract, and R: reduction in MIC, I: increase in MIC.
Co-modulation studies: MICs of Erythromycin plus 20 μg/mL of peptide extract.
| Organism | MIC ( | MF | Change in MIC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eryt | Eryt + CP | |||
|
| 125 | 125 | 1 |
|
|
| 7.8 | >7.8 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| 250 | >500 | <0.50 | > 100 |
|
| 125 | 250 | 0.50 | 100 |
|
| 500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| 125 | >500 | <0.25 | >100 |
|
| 125 | >500 | <0.25 | >100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1.00 | > 100 |
|
| 0.24 | >7.8 | <0.03 | >100 |
MIC experiments were replicated thrice; change in MIC computed using equation (2).
MF: modulation factor, Eryt: erythromycin, P: peptide extract, N: no change, and I: increase in MIC
Co-modulation studies: MIC values of mtronidazole plus 20 μg/mL of peptide extract.
| Organism | MIC ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Met | Met + CP | MF | Change in MIC (%) | |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | >500 | <1 | > 100 |
|
| >500 | 250 | >1 | <50 |
MIC experiments were replicated thrice; change in MIC computed using equation (2).
MF: modulation factor, Met: Metronidazole, P: peptide extract, R: reduction in mic, and I: increase in MIC