| Literature DB >> 30671348 |
Renata Sisto1, Pasquale Capone1, Luigi Cerini1, Filippo Sanjust1, Enrico Paci1, Daniela Pigini1, Maria Pia Gatto1, Monica Gherardi1, Andrea Gordiani1, Nunziata L'Episcopo1, Giovanna Tranfo1, Pieranna Chiarella1.
Abstract
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been recently acknowledged as novel and non-invasive biomarkers of exposure to environmental and occupational hazardous substances. This preliminary study investigates the potential role of blood miRNAs as molecular biomarkers of exposure to the most common organic solvents (ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene) used in the shipyard painting activity. Despite the low number of recruited workers, a two-tail standard Students' test with Holm-Bonferroni adjusted p-value shows a significant up-regulation of two miRNAs (miR_6819_5p and miR_6778_5p) in exposed workers with respect to controls. A correlation analysis between miRNA, differentially expressed in exposed workers and in controls and urinary dose biomarkers i.e. methylhyppuric acid (xylenes metabolite), phenylglyoxylic and mandelic acid (ethylbenzene metabolites) S-benzyl mercapturic acid (toluene metabolite) and S-phenylmercapturic acid (benzene metabolite) measured at the end of the work-shift, allowed the identification of high correlation (0.80-0.99) of specific miRNAs with their respective urinary metabolites. MiRNA_671_5p correlated with methylhippuric, S-phenylmercapturic and S-benzyl mercapturic acid while the miRNA best correlating with the phenylglioxylic acid was miRNA_937_5p. These findings suggest miRNA as sensitive biomarkers of low dose exposure to organic chemicals used at workplace. Urinary DNA and RNA repair biomarkers coming from the oxidation product of guanine have been also associated to the different miRNAs. A significant negative association was found between 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoGua) urinary concentration and miR_6778_5p. The findings of the present pilot study deserve to be tested on a larger population with the perspective of designing a miRNA based test of low dose exposure to organic solvents.Entities:
Keywords: Biological monitoring; Occupational exposure; Organic solvent; microRNA
Year: 2019 PMID: 30671348 PMCID: PMC6330509 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Subjects’ characteristics.
| task | age | sex | smoke | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | supervision | 51 | male | no |
| N2 | spray painting | 28 | male | no |
| N3 | spray painting | 37 | male | yes |
| N4 | spray painting | 34 | male | yes |
| C1 | control | 33 | male | no |
| C2 | control | 51 | female | no |
| C3 | control | 50 | female | no |
| C4 | control | 48 | male | no |
Analytical methods for urinary metabolites.
| VOC | Biomarker | Method | CV | LOD | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethylbenzene | Phenylglyoxylic acid (PGA) | HPLC-MS/MS | 11% | 0.015 mg/l | Paci et al., 2013 [ |
| Ethylbenzene | Mandelic acid (MA) | HPLC-MS/MS | 11% | 0.02 mg/l | |
| Xylenes | Methylhyppuric acid (MHIPP) | HPLC-MS/MS | 15% | 1 μg/mL | This paper |
| Toluene | S-benzyl mercapturic acid (SBMA) | HPLC-MS/MS | 15% | 0.35 μg/L | Sabatini et al., 2008 [ |
| Benzene | S-phenylmercapturic acid (SPMA) | HPLC-MS/MS | 10% | 0.026 μg/L | SPMA and cotinine were determined according to |
| Nicotine (active smoking) | cotinine | HPLC-MS/MS | 10% | 12.41 μg/L | |
| DNA repair activity | 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo) | HPLC-MS/MS | 20% | 1.69 nmol/L | Andreoli et al., 2010 [ |
| RNA repair activity | 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanosine (8-oxoGuo) | HPLC-MS/MS | 20% | 2.34 nmol/L | |
| DNA and RNA repair activity | 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoGua) | HPLC-MS/MS | 20% | 2.99 nmol/L |
Urinary metabolites measured in the two experimental campaigns at the beginning and the end of the work-shift.
| A Campaign | Metabolites expressed in μg /g Creatinine | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before shift | |||||||
| Subject code | MA | PGA | MA + PGA | SBMA | MHIPP | SPMA | Cotinine |
| N1 | 5299.65 | 2143.46 | 7443.10 | < LOD | < LOD | 0.18 | < LOD |
| N2 | 3199.99 | 291.02 | 3491.01 | < LOD | < LOD | 0.18 | < LOD |
| N3 | 2856.87 | 2229.66 | 5086.52 | < LOD | < LOD | 0.41 | < LOD |
| N4 | 1356.23 | 708.25 | 2064.48 | 0.00 | 1335.13 | 0.34 | 2616.01 |
| End shift | |||||||
| N1 | 4609.75 | 2731.45 | 7341.19 | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD |
| N2 | 3901.52 | 2564.39 | 6465.91 | 0.197 | 897.73 | 0.13 | < LOD |
| N3 | 1419.88 | 4326.67 | 5746.55 | < LOD | 2078 | 0.63 | 588.67 |
| N4 | 3339.34 | 2839.78 | 6179.12 | < LOD | 1706.6 | 0.77 | 1914.42 |
| Metabolites expressed in μg /g Creatinine | |||||||
| Before shift | |||||||
| Subject code | MA | PGA | MA + PGA | SBMA | MHIPP | SPMA | Cotinine |
| N1 | 1239.16 | 706.58 | 1945.74 | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD |
| N2 | 754.63 | 2421.58 | 3176.21 | 3.28 | < LOD | < LOD | < LOD |
| N3 | 706.70 | 2406.92 | 3113.62 | 6.55 | 32.45 | 0.27 | 386.22 |
| N4 | 1746.60 | 2205.08 | 3951.68 | 3.19 | 4768.84 | 0.72 | 1849.52 |
| End shift | |||||||
| N1 | 940.59 | 816.53 | 1757.12 | < LOD | 219.86 | 0.18 | < LOD |
| N2 | 1022.30 | 1659.64 | 2681.94 | 3.34 | 3722.39 | 0.12 | < LOD |
| N3 | 312.84 | 2576.83 | 2889.66 | 5.40 | 8559.29 | 0.46 | 468.05 |
| N4 | 1558.08 | 1550.51 | 3108.59 | 7.90 | 5252.53 | 1.31 | 1363.64 |
Unmetabolized VOCs in saliva and in urine.
| Subjects | ethylacetate | benzene | toluene | ethylbenzene | p-xylene | m-xylene | o-xylene | ∑Xylenes | styrene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saliva beginning of work-shift (ng/ml) | |||||||||
| N1 | 34.42 | 0.85 | 1.19 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 1.07 | 1.29 |
| N2 | 83.37 | 0.78 | 1.39 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.57 | 0.38 | 1.24 | 1.26 |
| N3 | 25.52 | 2.76 | 3.69 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 1.03 | 0.47 | 1.90 | 2.08 |
| N4 | 18.66 | 1.62 | 4.96 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 2.03 | 1.07 | 3.86 | 2.73 |
| Saliva end of work-shift (ng/ml) | |||||||||
| N1 | 27.10 | 0.84 | 3.40 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.58 | 1.77 | 1.61 |
| N2 | 83.40 | 0.83 | 14.65 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 2.11 | 0.86 | 3.78 | 2.02 |
| N3 | 108.83 | 0.76 | 18.40 | 0.92 | 1.05 | 2.34 | 0.85 | 4.23 | 1.33 |
| N4 | 71.23 | 0.81 | 3.63 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.88 | 0.56 | 1.80 | 1.14 |
| Paired t-test saliva | n.s | 0.08 | n.s | n.s | n.s | n.s | n.s | n.s | n.s |
| Urine beginning of work-shift (ng/ml) | |||||||||
| N1 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.05 |
| N2 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| N3 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| N4 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 0.08 |
| Urine end of work-shift (ng/ml) | |||||||||
| N1 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.11 |
| N2 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 2.24 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.37 | 0.11 |
| N3 | 0.40 | 0.17 | 4.11 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.53 | 0.10 |
| N4 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.89 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.12 |
| Paired t-test urine | 0.07 | n.s. | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Correlation urine - saliva | |||||||||
| beginning | −0.18 | 0.18 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.64 |
| end | 0.74 | −0.22 | 0.96 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.12 | 0.60 | −0.13 |
Correlation between each organic solvent, measured in saliva and in urine at the beginning and the end of the work-shift, and its main urinary metabolite.
| VOC-metabolite pair | Work-shift | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urine matrix | Saliva matrix | ||
| Xylenes - Methylhyppuric acid | beginning | 0.99 | 0.96 |
| end | 0.98 | 0.65 | |
| p-xylene - Methylhyppuric acid | beginning | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| end | 0.95 | 0.73 | |
| m-xylene - Methylhyppuric acid | beginning | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| end | 1.00 | 0.64 | |
| o-xylene - Methylhyppuric acid | beginning | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| end | 0.83 | 0.50 | |
| Ethylbenzene - PGA | beginning | 0.07 | 0.46 |
| end | 1.00 | 0.80 | |
| Ethylbenzene - MA | beginning | 0.90 | 0.67 |
| end | −0.51 | −0.71 | |
| Ethylbenzene - MA + PGA | beginning | 0.60 | 0.85 |
| end | 0.77 | 0.36 | |
| Benzene - SPMA | beginning | 0.96 | 0.45 |
| end | 0.98 | −0.24 | |
| Toluene - SBMA | beginning | 0.01 | 0.54 |
| end | 0.3 | 0.13 | |
Fig. 1Hierarchical clustering analysis with respect to the miRNA most differently expressed between exposed and control.
Fig. 2Expression matrix for the selected miRNA. The miRNAs are grouped as up and down-regulated in exposed with respect to control subjects.
Fig. 3Principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the miRNA of all samples of the dataset. The N1 subject is much more similar to the controls than to the exposed workers.
Fig. 4Principal component analysis (PCA) performed on the exposure biomarkers of all samples of the dataset. The N1 subject is much more similar to the controls than to the exposed subjects.
Linear regression analysis of the association between urinary biomarkers and selected miRNAs.
| Urinary biomarker | miRNA | R2 | β coeff | Stat sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHIPP (μg/g Creatinine) | 0.98 | 0.039 | 0.001071 | |
| hsa_miR_6893_5p | 0.75 | 0.04 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_5006_5p | 0.69 | 0.061 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_7108_5p | 0.7 | 0.017 | n.s | |
| 0.83 | 0.029 | 0.0443 | ||
| 0.85 | 0.034 | 0.0342 | ||
| hsa_miR_937_5p | 0.78 | 0.006 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_6071 | 0.68 | 0.025 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_3682_3p | 0.68 | 0.016 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_6879_5p | 0.65 | 0.160 | n.s. | |
| PGA (μg/g Creatinine) | hsa_miR_6893_5p | 0.77 | 0.053 | n.s. |
| hsa_miR_5006_5p | 0.76 | 0.0838 | n.s | |
| hsa_miR_7108_5p | 0.64 | 0.0214 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_638 | 0.72 | 0.783 | n.s. | |
| hsa_miR_5703 | 0.73 | 0.342 | n.s | |
| hsa_miR_630 | 0.72 | 0.731 | n.s. | |
| 0.83 | 0.008 | 0.0415 | ||
| hsa_miR_8072 | 0.7 | 0.137 | n.s. | |
| MA (μg/g Creatinine) | hsa_miR_6819_5p | 0.64 | 0.283 | n.s. |
| SBMA (μg/g Creatinine) | hsa_miR_671_5p | 0.65 | 34.04 | n.s. |
| SPMA (μg/g Creatinine) | hsa_miR_671_5p | 0.76 | 168.63 | n.s. |
| 8oxoGua (μg/g Creatinine) | hsa_miR_6778_5p | 0.72 | −3.76 | n.s. |
Fig. 5Exponential function of the (miRNA_671_5p) expression value versus the end shift concentration of Methylhyppuric acid.
Fig. 6Exponential function of the (miRNA_6778_5p) expression value versus the concentration of the 8oxoGua. The best fitting linear regression is also shown.