| Literature DB >> 30671343 |
Ji-Li Zhang1,2, Hong-Fei Si3, Xu-Zheng Zhou1,2, Xiao-Fei Shang1,2, Bing Li1,2, Ji-Yu Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Fasciola hepatica is a common parasite of grazing livestock in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in China, but its prevalence has not been studied. While triclabendazole is commonly used to treat F. hepatica infection in China, oxyclozanide has never been used. This study investigated the prevalence of F. hepatica infections in buffaloes in the Guangxi and evaluated the efficacy of oxyclozanide and triclabendazole as treatments. In the prevalence study, a total of 767 individual faecal samples were obtained from 58 farms in Guangxi to detect the prevalence of F. hepatica, and the total rate of infection was 87.35%. A subset of 277 infected buffaloes from these farms were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 101) was treated with oxyclozanide at 10 mg/kg.bw; group 2 (n = 94) was treated with triclabendazole (12 mg/kg.bw); and group 3 (n = 82) was untreated. Faecal samples were taken on days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Whole blood and serum were collected on days 0 and 14. Anthelmintic efficacy was assessed using faecal egg count reduction (FECR), buffaloes positive by coprology reduction (BPCR) as well as post-treatment improvement in biochemical and haematological indicators. After 28 days treatment, group 1 and 2 showed FECR% values above 98%, and BPCR% values of 97.03% and 77.66%, respectively. In addition, the biochemical indicators and haematological parameters were improved at 14 days post-treatment compared with those before treatment. These results indicate a high prevalence of F. hepatica in Guangxi, demonstrate that oxyclozanide and triclabendazole are effective against F. hepatica infection in buffaloes, and indicate that oxyclozanide could be used in China as an alternative drug.Entities:
Keywords: A, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BPCR, buffaloes positive by coprology reduction; Buffaloes; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; EOS, eosinophils; EPG, eggs per gram; Efficacy; F. gigantica, Fasciola gigantica; F. hepatica, Fasciola hepatica; FECR, faecal egg count reduction; Fasciola hepatica; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; GLU, glucose; Hb, haemoglobin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; Oxyclozanide; PCV, packed cell volume; Prevalence; RBCs, red blood cells; TP, total protein; Triclabendazole; WBCs, white blood cells
Year: 2019 PMID: 30671343 PMCID: PMC6330380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Experimental drugs, groups and doses.
| Groups | Number of animals | Anthelmintics | Dosage (mg/kg.bw) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 101 | Oxyclozanide | 10 mg/kg.bw |
| 2 | 94 | Triclabendazole | 12 mg/kg.bw |
| 3 | 82 |
Prevalence of F. hepatica infection in each district based on the faecal egg detection.
| Districts | Number of farms | Mean buffaloes/farm | Number of animals/district | Animals positive | Prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuzhou | 8 | 11.13 | 89 | 64 | 71.91 |
| Liuzhou | 8 | 14.75 | 118 | 104 | 88.14 |
| Yizhou | 12 | 20.50 | 246 | 211 | 85.77 |
| Jiangzhou | 4 | 8.25 | 33 | 29 | 87.88 |
| Yulin | 6 | 11.50 | 69 | 66 | 95.65 |
| Baise | 4 | 15.50 | 62 | 56 | 90.32 |
| Guilin | 10 | 10.00 | 100 | 95 | 95.00 |
| Chongzuo | 6 | 8.33 | 50 | 45 | 90.00 |
| Total | 58 | 13.22 | 767 | 670 | 87.35 |
Eggs per gram (EPG), faecal egg count reduction (FECR) and buffaloes positive by coprology reduction (BPCR).
| Days | EPG ± SD | FECR% (day 21) | FECR% (day 28) | BPCR (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | Methods | Methods | |||||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Group1 | 106.21 ± 41.19 | 42.34 ± 22.19∗ | 3.33 ± 8.77∗ | 1.53 ± 5.14∗ | 0.28 ± 1.67∗ | 98.56 | 98.56 | 98.55 | 99.73 | 99.74 | 99.73 | 97.03 |
| Group 2 | 100.89 ± 45.46 | 27.69 ± 20.91∗ | 17.45 ± 17.72∗ | 1.39 ± 3.04∗ | 1.63 ± 3.87∗ | 98.69 | 98.62 | 98.61 | 98.46 | 98.38 | 98.37 | 77.66 |
| Group 3 | 106.74 ± 41.02 | 101.69 ± 24.23 | 96.85 ± 20.50 | 107.14 ± 23.04 | 106.02 ± 17.76 | |||||||
The mean EPG of buffaloes from each group was counted at days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after treatment. FECR% were calculated at days 21 and 28 by the three methods (Method 1 was the WAAVP method; Method 2 calculated individual buffalo reductions followed by transformation and averaging; Method 3 accounted for changes in control values over time and used group means).
Significant differences of EPG between pre-treatment and post-treatment in each group were determined using the Mann-Whitney test.
* = Significant at the 5% level (P < 0.05).
Haematological parameters of the buffaloes on days 0 and 14 post-treatment.
| Groups | Day | WBC (109/L) | EOS (109/L) | RBC (1012/L) | Hb (g/L) | PCV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 12.8 ± 2.6 | 0.009 ± 0.011 | 5.7 ± 1.2 | 111 ± 15 | 34.8 ± 6.6 |
| 14 | 12.5 ± 2.0 | 0.004 ± 0.005∗ | 6.1 ± 1.2 | 115 ± 14 | 37.1 ± 5.6 | |
| 2 | 0 | 12.2 ± 1.1 | 0.006 ± 0.011 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 115 ± 15 | 34.1 ± 3.4 |
| 14 | 12.1 ± 1.2 | 0.005 ± 0.007 | 5.9 ± 0.7 | 116 ± 10 | 36.5 ± 6.2 | |
| 3 | 0 | 12.5 ± 1.7 | 0.006 ± 0.009 | 5.8 ± 0.7 | 115 ± 11 | 33.7 ± 3.3 |
| 14 | 12.9 ± 1.8 | 0.009 ± 0.019 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 113 ± 13 | 32.2 ± 5.0 |
The above values represent the mean ± SD of buffaloes from each group.
Significant differences between days 0 and 14 in each group were determined.
* = Significant at the 5% level (P < 0.05).
Biochemical parameters of the buffaloes on days 0 and 14 post-treatment.
| Groups | Day | TP (g/L) | A (g/L) | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | LDH (U/L) | GLU (mmol/L) | ALP (μmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 72.4 ± 8.8 | 22.9 ± 2.9 | 207 ± 35 | 36.0 ± 14.0 | 29.3 ± 7.5 | 828 ± 147 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 182 ± 31 |
| 14 | 72.9 ± 9.2 | 23.9 ± 3.3 | 198 ± 38 | 34.9 ± 9.0 | 25.1 ± 7.2∗ | 821 ± 129 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 180 ± 45 | |
| 2 | 0 | 73.1 ± 15.2 | 23.5 ± 2.9 | 198 ± 93 | 33.9 ± 4.7 | 30.0 ± 5.0 | 815 ± 102 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 163 ± 57 |
| 14 | 74.0 ± 8.6 | 25.3 ± 3.7∗ | 187 ± 34 | 32.9 ± 7.7 | 25.2 ± 5.8∗ | 812 ± 81 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 162 ± 41 | |
| 3 | 0 | 74.8 ± 10.0 | 23.0 ± 3.1 | 209 ± 35 | 33.3 ± 7.0 | 29.6 ± 6.1 | 835 ± 167 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 161 ± 50 |
| 14 | 73.6 ± 11.0 | 22.7 ± 4.3 | 241 ± 32∗ | 36.6 ± 7.6 | 31.9 ± 5.2 | 860 ± 80 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 167 ± 30∗ |
The above values represent the mean ± SD of buffaloes from each group.
Significant differences between days 0 and 14 in each group were determined.
* = Significant at the 5% level (P < 0.05).