| Literature DB >> 30671211 |
A Al-Madhani1, A Pathare2, S Al Zadjali2, M Al Rawahi2, I Al-Nabhani2, S Alkindi2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Newborn cord blood screening identifies infants with underlying haemoglobinopathies before they develop the characteristic symptoms or sequelae. AIMS: This study was performed to validate the interpretation high-performance chromatography (HPLC) along with complete blood count (CBC) results as a tool for universal neonatal screening of hemoglobin disorders in Oman.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC validation; Haemoglobinopathy; Neonatal; Screening; Sickle cell disease; Thalassaemia
Year: 2019 PMID: 30671211 PMCID: PMC6328035 DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2019.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ISSN: 2035-3006 Impact factor: 2.576
Comparative analysis of red cell indices in the group A cohort at birth (Mean±SD) and at the follow-up study (n=31).
| At birth | At follow-up | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.1±2.0 | 11.0±1.1 | <0.001 | |
| 4.8±0.8 | 5.3±0.8 | <0.01 | |
| 98.3±9.3 | 66.1±8.6 | <0.0001 | |
| 31.5±3.5 | 21.8±3.2 | <0.001 | |
| 32.0±1.2 | 32.9±1.7 | <0.005 | |
| 16.5±1.9 | 15.4±2.3 | <0.008 |
Students t test
Comparative analysis of red cell indices in the group B cohort at birth (Mean±SD) and at the follow-up study (n=151).
| At birth | At follow-up | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.14±1.7 | 11.3±1.2 | <0.001# | |
| 4.8±0.7 | 5.2±0.5 | <0.05# | |
| 98.3±7.9 | 67.9±7.0 | <0.0001# | |
| 31.7±3.3 | 21.8±2.4 | <0.001# | |
| 32.35±1.3 | 32.1±1.4 | 0.96# | |
| 16.4±1.6 | 14.2±2.1 | <0.001# |
Students t test
Comparative analysis of red cell indices in the group B cohort at birth (Mean±SD) and at the follow-up study with one alpha gene deletion (n=20).
| At birth | At follow-up | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.61±1.55 | 11. 3±1.17 | 0.006# | |
| 4.07±0.95 | 4.96±0.72 | 0.07# | |
| 100.1±8.2 | 69.04±3.6 | <0.001# | |
| 32.4±3.3 | 22.5±1.62 | <0.001# | |
| 32.3±1.54 | 32.77±1.86 | 0.63# | |
| 15.7±1.29 | 14.29±1.14 | 0.05# |
Students t test
Comparative analysis of red cell indices in group B cohort at birth (Mean±SD) and at the follow-up study with two alpha gene deletions (n=22).
| At birth | At follow-up | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.21±1.4 | 10.83±1.26 | <0.001# | |
| 5.35±0.45 | 5.37±0.33 | 0.91# | |
| 91.84±4.1 | 63.12±5.8 | <0.001# | |
| 28.46±1.4 | 20.1±1.9 | <0.001# | |
| 31±1.23 | 31.92±1.2 | 0.11# | |
| 17.29±1.7 | 14.64±3.1 | <0.03# |
Students t test
Red cell indices at follow up (Mean+SD) in the Hb Bart’s quantitation cohort at birth (n=72).
| Hb Bart’s at birth | Hb (g/dl) | RBC (x1012/L) | MCV (fl) | MCH (pg) | MCHC (g/dl) | RDW (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.75± 1.0 | 5.2±0.5 | 70.87±7.5 | 22.6±2.4 | 31.9±1.5 | 13.7±1.5 | |
| 11.13±1.2 | 5.16±0.7 | 69.0±3.6 | 21.5±1.6 | 32.7±1.8 | 14.3±1.1 | |
| 10.8±1.2 | 5.3±0.3 | 63.1±5.8 | 20.1±1.9 | 31.9±1.2 | 14.6±3.1 |
p <0.05, Students t test
Correlation of Hb Bart’s, Genescan peaks with DNA studies in the Hb Bart’s quantitation cohort at birth (n=72).
| α genotype (GAP PCR) | GeneScan Peaks ( | Hb Barts at birth | Hb Barts Mean | Hb Barts Median | Hb Barts IQ25 | Hb Barts IQ75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | |||
| 1.48 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.7 | |||
| 5.6 | 5.9 | 4.25 | 7.2 |
One subject who had a Hb Bart’s 4.2%, also had additional non-deletional alpha thalassaemia mutation shown by complete alpha gene sequencing study in this patient. IQ25-25th Centile, IQ75-75th Centile.
Figure 1Ethidium Bromide stained Agarose gel with PCR products of Alpha gene using control gene LIS. Lanes 1,2,4,5 shows one alpha gene deletion, lanes 3 & 6 show 2 alpha gene deletion whereas lane 7 shows normal alpha genes [No alpha gene deletion].
Figure 2Schematic diagram of Genescan studies for Alpha genes using control gene RNaseP.
Comparative analysis of red cell indices, HbF, HbA, HbS and HbA2 (Mean±SD) in the cohort with heterozygous structural β-globin gene defect [HbS, HbD, HbE & HbC] at birth and follow-up (n=67).
| HbS [n=38] | HbD [n=18] | HbE [n=10] | HbC [n=1] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At birth | Follow-up | P value | At birth | Follow-up | P value | At birth | Follow-up | P value | At birth | Follow-up | |
| 15.2±2.0 | 11.0±1.0 | <0.001 | 15.0±1.3 | 10.9±1.3 | <0.001 | 16.7±1.7 | 11.6±0.5 | <0.001 | 13.9 | 12 | |
| 5.0±0.8 | 5.2±0.8 | NS | 4.5±0.4 | 4.9±0.6 | NS | 5.4±0.8 | 4.7±0.3 | <0.05 | 4.15 | 5.3 | |
| 95.7±8.4 | 64.3±6.2 | <0.001 | 101.8±7.8 | 65.1±4.1 | <0.001 | 98.1±7.3 | 71.9±5.8 | <0.001 | 98.5 | 64.7 | |
| 30.5±3.2 | 21.3±2.5 | <0.001 | 33.6±3.5 | 22.3±2.2 | <0.001 | 31.6±3.1 | 24.7±2.2 | <0.001 | 33.5 | 22.6 | |
| 31.9±1.3 | 33.0±1.5 | <0.001 | 33.0±1.7 | 34.0±1.3 | <0.001 | 32.1±1.7 | 34.4±0.3 | <0.001 | 34 | 35 | |
| 16.5±1.7 | 15.2±2.1 | NS | 16.6±2.0 | 15.9±2.5 | NS | 17.6±2.2 | 15.0±3.1 | <0.05 | 16.5 | 19.3 | |
| 91.0±8.0 | 7.8±11.0 | <0.001 | 91.9±4.3 | 2.2±0.7 | <0.001 | 87.7±9.2 | 3.8±1.2 | <0.001 | 96.9 | 5.4 | |
| 13.0±6.5 | 50.5±18.5 | <0.001 | 13.8±9.9 | 54.6±5.6 | <0.001 | 23.1±7.9 | 60.0±3.4 | <0.001 | 8.8 | 60 | |
| 7.1±3.2 | 29.6±5.4 | <0.001 | 8.2±3.4 | 33.2±6.2 | <0.001 | 8.3±2.7 | 24.7±3.4 | <0.001 | 6 | 34.6 | |
| 3.2±1.6 | -- | 3.1±1.2 | -- | 87.7±9.2 | 3.8±1.2 | <0.001 | -- | 3.2 | |||
p-value, Students t-test; NS- p>0.05
Comparative analysis of red cell indices, HbA, HbF, and HbA2 (Mean±SD) in the cohort with Low HbA (<10%) at birth and follow-up (n=29).
| At birth | At follow-up | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.7±2.0 | 10.8±1.1 | <0.01 | |
| 4.3±0.5 | 5.2±0.9 | <0.01 | |
| 105.7±7.6 | 71.6±11.6 | <0.0001 | |
| 34.4±2.6 | 23.5±4.3 | <0.0001 | |
| 32.5±0.9 | 32.7±2.3 | 0.74 | |
| 16.3±2.5 | 16.0±2.7 | 0.77 | |
| 106.9±4.6 | 3.8±1.4 | <0.0001 | |
| 7.5±1.5 | 85.3±5.4 | <0.0001 | |
| 5.0±0.9 |
p-value, Students t-test