| Literature DB >> 30671045 |
Magdalena Wutkowska1,2, Anna Vader1, Sunil Mundra3, Elisabeth J Cooper2, Pernille B Eidesen1.
Abstract
Describing dynamics of belowground organisms, such as fungi, can be challenging. Results of studies based on environmental DNA (eDNA) may be biased as the template does not discriminate between metabolically active cells and dead biomass. We analyzed ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) coextracted from 48 soil samples collected from a manipulated snow depth experiment in two distinct vegetation types in Svalbard, in the High Arctic. Our main goal was to compare if the rDNA and rRNA metabarcoding templates produced congruent results that would lead to consistent ecological interpretation. Data derived from both rDNA and rRNA clustered according to vegetation types. Different sets of environmental variables explained the community composition based on the metabarcoding template. rDNA and rRNA-derived community composition of symbiotrophs and saprotrophs, unlike pathotrophs, clustered together in a similar way as when the community composition was analyzed using all OTUs in the study. Mean OTU richness was higher for rRNA, especially in symbiotrophs. The metabarcoding template was more important than vegetation type in explaining differences in richness. The proportion of symbiotrophic, saprotrophic and functionally unassigned reads differed between rDNA and rRNA, but showed similar trends. There was no evidence for increased snow depth influence on fungal community composition or richness. Our findings suggest that template choice may be especially important for estimating biodiversity, such as richness and relative abundances, especially in Helotiales and Agaricales, but not for inferring community composition. Differences in study results originating from rDNA or rRNA may directly impact the ecological conclusions of one's study, which could potentially lead to false conclusions on the dynamics of microbial communities in a rapidly changing Arctic.Entities:
Keywords: arctic vegetation; below-ground processes; fungal functional group; fungal trophic mode; snow fences; snow regime
Year: 2019 PMID: 30671045 PMCID: PMC6333106 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA, adonis function in vegan package) based on rDNA and rRNA presence-absence matrixes of all, symbiotrophic, saprotrophic and pathotrophic OTUs.
| Vegetation type | Snow regime | Vegetation X Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All OTUs rDNA | 0.16 | 0.133 | 0.04 | 0.247 | 0.04 | 0.102 |
| All OTUs rRNA | 0.14 | 0.047* | 0.06 | 0.011* | 0.05 | 0.374 |
| Symbiotrophs rDNA | 0.15 | 0.505 | 0.04 | 0.617 | 0.04 | 0.391 |
| Symbiotrophs rRNA | 0.06 | 0.512 | 0.05 | 0.737 | 0.06 | 0.247 |
| Saprotrophs rDNA | 0.13 | 0.023* | 0.06 | 0.024* | 0.05 | 0.047* |
| Saprotrophs rRNA | 0.10 | 0.435 | 0.07 | 0.113 | 0.04 | 0.897 |
| Pathotrophs rDNA | 0.12 | 0.045* | 0.06 | 0.081 . | 0.06 | 0.114 |
| Pathotrophs rRNA | 0.08 | 0.424 | 0.05 | 0.402 | 0.06 | 0.459 |
FIGURE 1Global non-dimensional scaling of all 42 samples plotted based on presence-absence table that included 837 OTUs (A) and according to template (B, rDNA – 23 samples; C, rRNA – 19 samples) and vegetation type (H, heath; M, meadow).
Edaphic variables and vegetation type as a factor fitted into global non-dimensional scaling of all 23 rDNA samples and 19 rRNA samples (plotted based on presence-absence matrixes that included all OTUs, symbiotrophs, saprotrophs, and pathotrophs).
| rDNA | rRNA r2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r2 | Pr( > r) | r2 | Pr( > r) | |
| pH | 0.77 | 0.001*** | 0.67 | 0.001*** |
| Moisture | 0.12 | 0.245 | 0.16 | 0.248 |
| Conductivity | 0.22 | 0.062 . | 0.36 | 0.028* |
| Organic matter | 0.12 | 0.256 | 0.69 | 0.001*** |
| Total nitrogen | 0.17 | 0.144 | 0.61 | 0.001** |
| Carbon | 0.13 | 0.239 | 0.64 | 0.001** |
| Carbon/nitrogen ratio | 0.39 | 0.011* | 0.03 | 0.789 |
| pH | 0.77 | 0.001*** | 0.63 | 0.002** |
| Moisture | 0.12 | 0.277 | 0.13 | 0.326 |
| Conductivity | 0.22 | 0.073 . | 0.36 | 0.022* |
| Organic matter | 0.12 | 0.246 | 0.65 | 0.001*** |
| Total nitrogen | 0.17 | 0.131 | 0.50 | 0.005** |
| Carbon | 0.13 | 0.214 | 0.49 | 0.007** |
| Carbon/nitrogen ratio | 0.39 | 0.007** | 0.06 | 0.599 |
| pH | 0.58 | 0.001*** | 0.60 | 0.002** |
| Moisture | 0.10 | 0.332 | 0.17 | 0.242 |
| Conductivity | 0.10 | 0.340 | 0.11 | 0.356 |
| Organic matter | 0.10 | 0.337 | 0.58 | 0.001*** |
| Total nitrogen | 0.25 | 0.052 . | 0.43 | 0.015* |
| Carbon | 0.19 | 0.115 | 0.54 | 0.002** |
| Carbon/nitrogen ratio | 0.27 | 0.048* | 0.06 | 0.630 |
| pH | 0.14 | 0.224 | 0.03 | 0.807 |
| Moisture | 0.07 | 0.457 | 0.01 | 0.931 |
| Conductivity | 0.01 | 0.916 | 0.08 | 0.500 |
| Organic matter | 0.01 | 0.940 | 0.04 | 0.715 |
| Total nitrogen | 0.01 | 0.957 | 0.04 | 0.757 |
| Carbon | 0.01 | 0.902 | 0.03 | 0.786 |
| Carbon/nitrogen ratio | 0.03 | 0.735 | 0.01 | 0.918 |
FIGURE 2Richness of detected fungal OTUs in meadow and heath (without 2 outliers). Red lines connect mean values.
Richness of detected fungal OTUs in a snow fence experimental setup.
| n | μall ± Sd | μSymbio ± Sd | μsapro ± Sd | μpatho ± Sd | μunassign±Sd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA_H | 11 | 100.1 ± 17.1 | 39.4 ± 9.8 | 12.6 ± 2.5 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 42.3 ± 9.4 |
| RNA_H | 11 | 115.5 ± 14.6 | 45.1 ± 10.2 | 13.6 ± 3.0 | 5.5 ± 2.4 | 50.4 ± 7.5 |
| DNA_M | 12 | 104.1 ± 30.2 | 31.4 ± 6.6 | 15.2 ± 6.9 | 6.3 ± 3.8 | 50.3 ± 18.0 |
| RNA_M | 8 | 115.1 ± 27.8 | 41.2 ± 9.9 | 16.9 ± 5.5 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 51.8 ± 13.6 |
| DNA_M (no outliers) | 11 | 97.5 ± 20.6 | 30.8 ± 6.6 | 13.6 ± 4.6 | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 46.5 ± 13.2 |
| RNA_M (no outliers) | 7 | 108.9 ± 23.1 | 38.6 ± 7.8 | 16.0 ± 5.3 | 4.0 ± 2.1 | 49.0 ± 12.0 |
Results of linear mixed models explaining richness of all OTUs, symbiotrophs, saprotrophs and saprotrophs.
| Response | Fixed effects | Interaction | Random effects | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Intercept ± 1SE | Template ± 1SE | Vegetationl ± SE | Template x vegetation type±1SE | Fence:block ± SD | Block ± SD | |||
| All OTUs | 99.7 ± 5.8 | 16.5 ± 7.9 | 0.034 | -2.5 ± 8.2 | 0.591 | -4.7 ± 12.0 | 0.729 | 13.94 ± 3.7 | 0 |
| Symbiotrophs | 39.0 ± 3.1 | 6.2 ± 3.7 | 0.031 | -8.2 ± 4.3 | 0.200 | 1.8 ± 5.7 | 0.775 | 0 | 5.2 ± 2.3 |
| Saprotrophs (Im) | 12.3 ± 1.0 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 0.548 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 0.548 | 1.4 ± 2.5 | 0.588 | ||
| Pathotrophs (Im) | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.503 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.503 | -2.1 ± 1.4 | 0.015 | ||
| Unassigned | 41.8 ± 3.4 | 9.2 ± 4.4 | 0.080 | 4.4 ± 4.8 | 0.916 | -6.2 ± 6.7 | 0.410 | 11.36 ± 3.4 | 0 |
FIGURE 3Relative abundances of all reads divided into trophic modes (saprotrophs, symbiotrophs, pathotrophs and functionally unassigned OTUs).
FIGURE 4Correlation of rDNA- and rRNA-derived abundances of OTUs grouped in higher taxonomic rank (order) and divided into assigned trophic modes. Abundance data come from 9 pairs of coresponding rDNA and rRNA samples; data were log transformed. Data points above the line show orders which contributed more to rRNA than rDNA pool; and vice versa, data points beneath the line point out orders that contributed more to rDNA than rRNA pool.