| Literature DB >> 30670964 |
Duosheng Luo1,2, Jingbiao Li1,2, Kechun Chen1,2, Xianglu Rong1,2, Jiao Guo1,2.
Abstract
Fufang <span class="Chemical">Zhenzhu Tiaozhi (<span class="Chemical">FTZ), as an effective traditional Chinese medicine, has been prescribed for more than 20 years. It has proven clinical efficacy as a prescription for patients with dyslipidemia, glucocorticoid- and high-fat-induced osteoporosis, but its effect on osteoporosis induced by aging is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-osteoporosis effect of FTZ in aging mice and revealed its biochemical action mechanism using metabolomics. Model of primary osteoporosis induced by aging was established. The mice in treatment group received a therapeutic dose of oral FTZ extract once daily during the experiment. The model and control groups received the corresponding volume of oral normal saline solution. Plasma samples of all three groups were collected after 12 weeks. Clinical biochemical parameters and biomechanics were determined in the osteoporosis model induced by normal aging to evaluate anti-osteoporosis effect of FTZ. Ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF/MS) was used to analyze metabolic changes. The changes of histomorphometric and biomechanic parameters of femurs, as well as osteoblast and osteoclast activity indicated that FTZ administration reduced the risk of osteoporosis. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plot revealed a clear separation trend between model and controls. Moreover, PLS-DA score plot indicated the anti-osteoporosis effect of FTZ with sphingosine 1-phosphate, LPA (16:0) and arachidonic acid (AA) among key biomarkers. The pivotal pathways revealed by pathway analysis including sphingolipid metabolism, glycerophospholipid metabolism, and AA metabolism. The mechanism by which FTZ reduces the risk of primary age-related osteoporosis in mice might be related to disorders of the above-mentioned pathways. FTZ has a protective effect against osteoporosis induced by aging, which may be mediated via interference with sphingolipid, glycerophospholipid, and AA metabolisms in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Fufang Zhenzhu Tiaozhi; aging-induced osteoporosis; mass spectrometry; metabolomics; ultra performance liquid chromatography
Year: 2019 PMID: 30670964 PMCID: PMC6331458 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1(A) Body weight of control, model, and FTZ groups. (B) Serum estradiol E2 levels of control, model, and FTZ groups. (C) Micro-CT femur parameters. (D) Micro-CT three-dimensional images. Femur images of control, model, and FTZ groups.
FIGURE 2Bone biomechanics parameters of control, model, and FTZ groups. (A–E) Bone parameters of the distal femur analyzed by INSTRON E1000 electrodynamic static universal testing machine. (A) Elastic load. (B) Frartufe load. (C) Bending energy. (D) Displacement. (E) Stiffness.
FIGURE 3The concentrations of osteoblast and osteoclast indicators. Effects on serum osteoblast and osteoclast indicators, calcium and phosphate content ratio of control, model, and FTZ groups (A–D). (A) BGP, osteocalcin. (B) ALP, alkaline phosphatase. (C) OPG, osteoprotegerin. (D) PINP, procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide. (E,F) Osteoclast indicators. (E) PYD, pyridinoline. (F) NTX, cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen.
FIGURE 4Metabolic profiling and multivariate statistical analysis. (A) Base peak intensity chromatograms of control, model, and FTZ groups in positive ion mode obtained from UPLC-QTOF/MS analysis. (B) Score plot of PLS-DA of control, model, and FTZ groups. [R2X(cum) = 0.971, Q2(cum) = 0.738]. (C) Clustering analysis of control, model, and FTZ groups. (D) Loading plot of PLS-DA in positive ion mode from control, model, and FTZ groups.
Identified potential biomarkers, fold changes (FC) and p-values among control, model, and FTZ groups.
| No. | Metabolite | tR–m/z | Elemental composition | Model vs. Control | FTZ vs. Model | FTZ vs. Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | FC | FC | |||||||
| 1 | Sphingosine 1-phosphate | 20.52–380.2090 | C18H38NO5P | 6.58 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.02 | 5.50 | 0.00 |
| 2 | LPA (0:0/16:0) | 11.95–452.2801 | C19H39O7P | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
| 3 | LysoPE (22:5) | 12.73–528.3105 | C27H46NO7P | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
| 4 | DG (36:3) | 16.11–619.4063 | C39H7O5 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| 5 | PC (16:0/18:1) | 28.43–802.5384 | C46H76NO8P | 0.63 | 0.01 | 1.37 | 0.01 | 0.86 | 0.21 |
| 6 | PC (40:9) | 20.52–828.5545 | C48H78NO8P | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.03 | 2.02 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Neuroprotectin D1 | 17.64–361.1682 | C22H32O4 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 0.04 | 1.84 | 0.00 |
| 8 | Arachidonic acid | 8.98–305.1617 | C20H32O2 | 3.78 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 0.00 |
| 9 | Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate | 15.93–341.1827 | C6H14O12P2 | 16.79 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| 10 | NADH | 29.16–666.3661 | C21H29N7O14P2 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 11 | Glycocholic acid | 15.73–466.3327 | C26H43NO6 | 1.24 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.00 |
| 12 | Taurodeoxycholic acid | 11.73–500.2791 | C26H45NO6S | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
FIGURE 5Heatmap of 12 potential biomarkers among control, model, and FTZ groups. Red and green indicate increased and decreased levels, respectively.
FIGURE 6(A) PLS-DA-Based ROC curves of the 12 potential biomarker of anti-osteoporosis effects of FTZ. The associated AUC, 95% CI, sensitivities, and specificities are indicated. (B) Relative intensity analysis of 12 potential biomarkers. Box plots showing significant changes in the levels of 12 potential biomarkers among the control, model, and FTZ groups. The statistical significance between the two groups is marked; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 significant difference compared with control group; p < 0.05, p < 0.01 significant difference compared with model group. Y-axis: normalized relative intensity.
FIGURE 7Metabolic pathway analysis of identified differential species. (A) Summary of IPA with MetPA. (B) QEA performed using MSEA. (C) Overview of glycerophospholipid metabolism with MetPA (reference map by KEGG). Green boxes represent enzymatic activities with putative cases of analogy in mice.
Ingenuity pathway analysis with MetPA from differential biomarkers.
| Pathway name | Total metabolites | Hits | -log( | Holm | FDR | Impact | Details | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 30 | 2 | 0.0085 | 4.76 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.336 | Figure |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 36 | 2 | 0.0122 | 4.41 | 0.98 | 0.49 | 0.326 | Supplementary Figure |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 6 | 1 | 0.0293 | 3.53 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.000 | Supplementary Figure |
| Alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism | 9 | 1 | 0.0437 | 3.13 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.000 | Supplementary Figure |
| Glycerolipid metabolism | 18 | 1 | 0.0858 | 2.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.019 | Supplementary Figure |
| Sphingolipid metabolism | 21 | 1 | 0.0994 | 2.31 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.030 | Supplementary Figure |
| Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 42 | 1 | 0.1903 | 1.66 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.000 | Supplementary Figure |
| Primary bile acid biosynthesis | 46 | 1 | 0.2067 | 1.58 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.029 | Supplementary Figure |