| Literature DB >> 30670503 |
Tarique Al Musa1, Akhlaque Uddin1, Catherine Loveday2, Laura E Dobson1, Mark Igra3, Fiona Richards1, Peter P Swoboda1, Anvesha Singh4,5, Pankaj Garg1, James R J Foley1, Graham J Fent1, Anthony J P Goddard3, Christopher Malkin3, Sven Plein1,3, Daniel J Blackman3, Gerald P McCann4,5, John P Greenwood1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of silent cerebral infarction and impact on cognitive function following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the first-generation CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) and second-generation Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Natick Massachusetts, USA).Entities:
Keywords: boston lotus; cerebral MRI; medtronic corevalve; neurocognitive function; transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30670503 PMCID: PMC6347912 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Patient characteristics in those with 6-month follow-up
| Lotus (n=29) | CoreValve (n=37) | P value* | |
| Age (years) | 79.8±8.9 | 81.2±7.2 | 0.459 |
| Male, n (%) | 14 (48) | 17 (46) | 0.851 |
| EuroSCORE II | 4.13±3.30 | 5.55±3.79 | 0.115 |
| STS Score (%) | 4.04±2.59 | 5.28±3.41 | 0.109 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.5±5.2 | 27.2±5.4 | 0.323 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 11 (38) | 20 (54) | 0.157 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 5 (17) | 4 (11) | 0.450 |
| Hyperlipidaemia, n (%) | 17 (59) | 18 (49) | 0.488 |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 5 (17) | 9 (24) | 0.449 |
| Previous MI, n (%) | 7 (24) | 2 (5) |
|
| Previous PCI, n (%) | 9 (31) | 10 (27) | 0.774 |
| Previous CABG, n (%) | 5 (17) | 8 (22) | 0.618 |
| Previous stroke, n (%) | 7 (24) | 6 (16) | 0.454 |
| Peripheral vascular disease, n (%) | 4 (14) | 5 (14) | 0.991 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 69±19 | 64±17 | 0.342 |
Values are mean±SD or n (%).
*P value for comparison between procedure types.
BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; EuroSCORE, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Figure 1Study profile. TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Catheterisation data for TAVI implant procedures
| Lotus (n=29) | CoreValve (n=37) | P value | |
| TAVI size (n(%)) | 23 mm (7 (24%)) | 23 mm (4 (11%)) | – |
| Femoral route, n (%) | 29 (100) | 27 (73) | 0.081 |
| Sheath size (French) | 18 (28%) | 18 (100%) | |
| Pullback PG (mm Hg) | 56±27 | 43±19 |
|
| Fluoroscopy time (min) | 29±8 | 18±11 |
|
| Procedure time (min) | 159±42 | 143±50 | 0.194 |
| Contrast (ml) | 120±43 | 134±43 | 0.212 |
| Predilatation BAV, n (%) | 25 (86) | 28 (77) | 0.286 |
| Postdilatation, n (%) | 0 (0) | 5 (14) |
|
| TAVI repositioned, n (%) | 7 (24) | 0 (0) |
|
| TAVI embolisation, n (%) | 0 (0) | 3 (8) | 0.117 |
| Need for second TAVI, n (%) | 0 (0) | 3 (8) | 0.117 |
*Independent samples t-test
PG, pressure gradient; BAV, balloon aortic valvuloplasty; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 2Diffusion-weighted MRI of the brain examining silent injury with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Cerebral images, including the brainstem and cerebellum before (A) and after (B) the TAVI procedure. Multiple new cerebral infarctions were seen, some of which are highlighted by the red arrows.
Comparison of MRI DWI following Boston Lotus and Medtronic CoreValve
| Lotus (n=29) | CoreValve (n=37) | P value | |
| Incidence of new microinfarction (n(%)) | 23(79) | 22(59) |
|
| Number of new microinfarcts per patient | 3.5 (IQR 7.0) | 2.0 (IQR 3.0) |
|
| Mean microinfarct volume per patient (ml) | 0.36 (IQR 0.57) | 0.17 (IQR 0.21) | 0.166 |
| Number of new small lesions (<5 mm) (n(%)) | 124(78) | 41(72) |
|
| Number of new large lesions (≥5 mm) (n(%)) | 34(22) | 16(28) |
|
| Number of patients with new ACA lesions (n(%)) | 14(48) | 2 (5) |
|
| Number of patients with new MCA lesions (n(%)) | 20(69) | 19(51) | 0.149 |
| Number of patients with new PCA lesions (n(%)) | 10(34) | 6 (16) | 0.086 |
| Number of patients with new VBA lesions (n(%)) | 15(52) | 7 (19) |
|
ACA, anterior cerebral artery; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; MCA, middle cerebral artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; VBA, vertebrobasilar artery
Statistically significant P values < 0.05 are shown in bold.
Summary of neurocognitive test scores at baseline, 30 days and 12 months
| TAVI | Baseline |
| P value |
| P value | |
|
| Lotus | 28.6±1.6 | 28.8±1.8 | 0.468 | 28.7±2.0 | 0.743 |
|
| ||||||
| Total learning | Lotus | 21.4±7.2 | 21.5±4.1 | 0.913 | 23.3±6.1 | 0.104 |
| CoreValve | 17.7±6.3 | 18.6±6.1 | 0.512 | 18.3±7.8 | 0.764 | |
| Delayed recall | Lotus | 7.6±3.0 | 6.3±3.4 |
| 9.0±6.7 |
|
| CoreValve | 5.8±2.8 | 5.3±3.8 | 0.296 | 4.3±4.4 | 0.419 | |
| Discrimination Index | Lotus | 10.2±1.5 | 8.6±2.9 |
| 10.1±2.4 |
|
| CoreValve | 9.6±2.1 | 9.1±3.4 | 0.373 | 7.9±4.5 | 0.147 | |
|
| ||||||
| A | Lotus | 47.0±15.0 | 56.0±27.6 | 0.112 | 50.5±19.7 | 0.354 |
| CoreValve | 56.9±27.8 | 61.1±40.0 | 0.566 | 66.1±49.8 | 0.431 | |
| B | Lotus | 170.9±86.5 | 140.7±62.8 |
| 152.3±87.5 | 0.273 |
| CoreValve | 171.1±121.4 | 155.2±79.0 | 0.548 | 143.3±64.4 | 0.969 | |
|
| Lotus | 43.2±15.8 | 45.5±16.0 | 0.254 | 44.2±13.5 | 0.253 |
| CoreValve | 33.9±14.1 | 34.6±13.3 | 0.704 | 34.4±15.7 | 0.633 | |
|
| Lotus | 7.6±4.5 | 8.6±3.5 | 0.387 | 8.6±2.6 | 0.876 |
|
| ||||||
| Dominant score | Lotus | 163.1±102.4 | 136.9±75.7 | 0.336 | 142.7±38.0 | 0.670 |
| Non-dominant score | Lotus | 158.0±37.7 | 148.5±53.4 | 0.373 | 159.6±47.0 | 0.658 |
Mean±SD.
*Comparing values at baseline and 30 days, same TAVI design, paired samples t-test.
†Comparing values at 30 days and 12 months, same TAVI design, paired samples t-test.
DSST, Digit-Symbol Substitution Test; HVLT, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; LNS, Letter Number Sequencing; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Within-group comparison of mean change in cognitive domain over 12 months in patients with and without diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI lesions
| Boston Lotus (n=25) | Medtronic CoreValve (n=24) | |||||
| DWI −ve (n=6) | DWI +ve (n=19) | P value | DWI –ve (n=11) | DWI +ve (n=13) | P value | |
| MMSE | 1.2±0.8 | −0.4±1.9 |
| −0.9±2.5 | −0.7±2.6 | 0.840 |
| HVLT learning | 4.2±5.2 | 1.2±7.3 | 0.454 | 1.1±3.9 | 1.0±9.1 | 0.691 |
| HVLT delayed | 6.3±12.9 | −0.1±3.3 | 0.177 | −0.2±2.5 | −1.1±3.1 | 0.456 |
| HVLT discrimination | 0.0±1.5 | −0.1±2.6 | 0.733 | 0.8±2.3 | −2.3±3.5 |
|
| TMT A | 15.5±20.8 | −0.1±15.3 | 0.059 | 18.9±64.9 | 5.0±14.7 | 0.562 |
| TMT B | −13.0±88.9 | −18.3±61.4 | 0.870 | 19.6±61.6 | −1.4±64.4 | 0.454 |
| DSST | 4.0±10.0 | −0.4±9.8 | 0.346 | −0.1±6.7 | 5.0±13.7 | 0.370 |
| LNS | 2.4±3.0 | 0.7±5.1 | 0.534 | −0.5±5.0 | 0.8±3.6 | 0.474 |
| GPBT dominant | −8.2±31.5 | −24.5±108.0 | 0.721 | 0.5±37.6 | 22.6±37.7 | 0.186 |
| GPBT non-dominant | −26.0±83.7 | −3.2±51.3 | 0.914 | 43.0±81.3 | 20.8±66.8 | 0.235 |
Mean±SD.
DSST, Digit-Symbol Substitution Test; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; GPBT, Grooved Pegboard Test; HVLT, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; LNS, Letter Number Sequencing; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; TMT, Trail Making Test.
Figure 3Line graph depicting change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (A and B) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Discrimination Index (C and D) over time following Lotus and CoreValve. (Red lines indicate patients with diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI microinfarcts, blue lines those without).