Literature DB >> 30670399

Unfinished Business: The Role of Research in Family Medicine.

Robin S Gotler1.   

Abstract

Although the generation of new knowledge through research is a hallmark of medical specialties, research was a low priority in family practice when it was established in 1969. Today, when a base of knowledge is crucial to the ability to lead health care change, the early relationship between family practice and research continues to influence the specialty. An examination of archival and secondary materials finds that the priority placed on research during family practice's early years was shaped by internal and external factors, including, (1) family physicians' desire to differentiate themselves from the prevailing specialty environment; (2) lack of a clear identity in family practice; (3) the non-laboratory nature of family medicine research; (4) reliance on information from other specialties; and, (5) a focus on establishing an academic presence. The low level of attention given to research during the early years of family practice has had lasting implications, as the specialty seeks to transform practice while continuing to struggle to achieve academic acceptance. A strong culture of generalist knowledge is crucial in assuring family medicine's future and strengthening its ability to improve the health of individuals, families, and communities.
© 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Year:  2019        PMID: 30670399      PMCID: PMC6342586          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  28 in total

1.  The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011.

Authors:  Kevin A Peterson; Paula Darby Lipman; Carol J Lange; Rachel A Cohen; Steve Durako
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  The future of family practice in our medical schools.

Authors:  J L Dennis
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Editorial: Expanded literature base as a critical need in family practice.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Specialist in family practice--prototype of a doctor.

Authors:  V Wilson
Journal:  GP       Date:  1969-08

6.  On entry into phase two in family practice development.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Family medicine research. Status at the end of the first decade.

Authors:  L Culpepper; P Franks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Climate for research in family practice.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Family practice in evolution: progress, problems and projections.

Authors:  J P Geyman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The intellectual basis of family practice.

Authors:  G G Stephens
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  3 in total

1.  Building a Culture of Scholarship Within a Family Medicine Department: a Successful Eight-Year Journey of Incremental Interventions Following a Historical Perspective of Family Medicine Research.

Authors:  Adam M Franks; Stephen M Petrany
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-10-20

2.  Attitude, knowledge, and barriers towards research analysis and writing in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Jafar Radhi Albumijdad; Abdulmonem Saleh Alismail; Muslem Adel Albesher; Abdulmohsin Mohammed Alhajri
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-14

3.  Primer on binary logistic regression.

Authors:  Jenine K Harris
Journal:  Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2021-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.