Literature DB >> 30669922

Toward a system where workforce planning and interprofessional practice and education are designed around patients and populations not professions.

Erin Fraher1, Barbara Brandt2.   

Abstract

Traditional workforce planning methodologies and interprofessional education (IPE) approaches will not address the significant challenges facing health care systems seeking to integrate services, eliminate waste and meet rising demand within fixed or shrinking budgets. This article describes how New Zealand's workforce planning approach could be used as a model by other countries to move toward needs-based, interprofessional workforce planning. Such an approach requires a paradigm shift to reframe health workforce planning away from a focus on shortages toward assessing how to more effectively deploy and retrain the existing workforce; away from silo-based workforce projection models toward methodologies that recognize professions' overlapping scopes of practice; and away from a focus on traditional health professions toward including both health and social care workers. We propose that IPE must develop new models of learning that are delivered in the context of practice. This will require a shift from today's predominant focus on preparing students in the pipeline to be collaboration-ready to designing clinical practice environments that support continuous learning that benefits not just learners, but patients, populations, and providers as well. We highlight the need for improved data and methods to evaluate IPE and call for better collaboration between health workforce planners and IPE stakeholders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interprofessional education; New Zealand; international; interprofessional collaborative practice; new models of care; workforce planning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30669922     DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1564252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  7 in total

1.  Exploring interprofessional identity development in healthcare graduates and its impact on practice.

Authors:  Ruyi Tong; Margo Brewer; Helen Flavell; Lynne Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Cross-sectional analysis of US scope of practice laws and employed physician assistants.

Authors:  Virginia L Valentin; Shahpar Najmabadi; C Everett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The evolution of New Zealand's health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform.

Authors:  Gareth H Rees
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2019-07-05

4.  Workforce Development in Integrated Care: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Frances Barraclough; Jennifer Smith-Merry; Viktoria Stein; Sabrina Pit
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.120

5.  Developing Interprofessional Primary Care Teams: Alumni Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education Program.

Authors:  Nancy D Harada; Shruthi Rajashekara; Shubhada Sansgiry; Kathryn Wirtz Rugen; Samuel King; Stuart C Gilman; Jessica A Davila
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Co-designing a methodology for workforce development during the personalisation of allied health service funding for people with disability in Australia.

Authors:  Kristen Foley; Stacie Attrill; Chris Brebner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Enhancing primary care and preventive services through Interprofessional practice and education.

Authors:  Terri Fowler; David Garr; Natalie Di Pietro Mager; Joan Stanley
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2020-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.