Literature DB >> 30669890

Prostheses for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Jillian M Kazley1, Keegan P Cole1, Khusboo J Desai1, Samuel Zonshayn1, Andrew S Morse1, Samik Banerjee1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Historically, patients with rotator cuff arthropathy had limited reconstructive options. The early generations of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) designs had increased failure rates due to loosening of glenoid baseplates secondary to excessive torques. In 1985, Paul Grammont introduced a prosthetic design changing the center of rotation that addressed this major complication. The Grammont principles remain the foundation of modern reverse total shoulder prostheses, although the original design has undergone several adaptations. We reviewed here the various aspects of prosthetic designs including baseplates, glenospheres, humeral components, and polyethylene bearing interfaces. AREAS COVERED: We discuss the evolution, biomechanics, prosthetic options, and future direction for rTSA. A literature search using the PubMed database including review articles, biomechanical studies, and clinical trials pertaining to rTSA prothesis and outcomes. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Despite an expansion in the understanding of the biomechanics of the rotator cuff deficient shoulder and its effect on the reverse total shoulder prostheses, Grammont principles remain the foundation of contemporary rTSA designs. Further clinical studies are needed to assess how modern prosthetic modifications effect clinical and radiographic outcomes. Additionally, implants are being used in younger individuals with expanded indications, therefore, close clinical monitoring is needed to better evaluate their prosthetic longevity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse; arthroplasty; designs; mechanics; shoulder; total

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30669890     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1568237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  Anatomical and reverse megaprosthesis in proximal humerus reconstructions after oncologic resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michele Fiore; Andrea Sambri; Claudio Giannini; Riccardo Zucchini; Roberto De Cristofaro; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Influence of Glenosphere and baseplate parameters on Glenoid bone strains in reverse shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Leo Pauzenberger; Cory Dwyer; Elifho Obopilwe; Michael D Nowak; Mark Cote; Anthony A Romeo; Augustus D Mazzocca; Felix Dyrna
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Julia K Frank; Paul Siegert; Fabian Plachel; Philipp R Heuberer; Stephanie Huber; Jakob E Schanda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.