| Literature DB >> 30669264 |
Nieves Iglesias1, Elsa Galbis2, M Jesús Díaz-Blanco3, Ricardo Lucas4, Elena Benito5, M-Violante de-Paz6.
Abstract
In the present work, we demonstrate the preparation of chitosan-based composites as vehicles of the natural occurring multi-drug resveratrol (RES). Such systems are endowed with potential therapeutic effects on inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, through the sustained colonic release of RES from long-lasting mucoadhesive drug depots. The loading of RES into nanoparticles (NPs) was optimized regarding two independent variables: RES/polymer ratio, and temperature. Twenty experiments were carried out and a Box⁻Behnken experimental design was used to evaluate the significance of these independent variables related to encapsulation efficiency (EE). The enhanced RES EE values were achieved in 24 h at 39 °C and at RES/polymer ratio of 0.75:1 w/w. Sizes and polydispersities of the optimized NPs were studied by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Chitosan (CTS) dispersions containing the RES-loaded NPs were ionically gelled with tricarballylic acid to yield CTS-NPs composites. Macro- and microscopic features (morphology and porosity studied by SEM and spreadability), thermal stability (studied by TGA), and release kinetics of the RES-loaded CTS-NPs were investigated. Release patterns in simulated colon conditions for 48 h displayed significant differences between the NPs (final cumulative drug release: 79⁻81%), and the CTS-NPs composites (29⁻34%).Entities:
Keywords: Crohn’s disease; IBD; colon; drug depot; hydrogels; inflammatory bowel disease; mucoadhesive; nanoparticles; ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30669264 PMCID: PMC6359380 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20020398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) per year of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in selected locations in 2017, ordered by incidence and sex.
Experimental encapsulation efficiency values of resveratrol loaded NPs (nanoparticles) for non-cross-linked and cross-linked systems at different RES (Resveratrol)/polymer ratios and temperatures following the experimental design 1.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.25 | 25 | 1 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.25-T25 | 6.80 |
| 0.25 | 25 | 2 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.25-T32 | 29.51 |
| 0.25 | 25 | 3 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.25-T39 | 33.82 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 4 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.5-T25 | 23.87 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 5 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.5-T32 | 36.00 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 6 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.5-T32 | 38.18 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 7 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.5-T39 | 49.37 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 8 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.75-T25 | 18.31 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 9 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.75-T32 | 37.54 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 10 | NonXr-RES/Pol0.75-T39 | 48.10 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.25 | 25 | 11 | Xr-RES/Pol0.25-T25 | 9.51 |
| 0.25 | 25 | 12 | Xr-RES/Pol0.25-T32 | 43.74 |
| 0.25 | 25 | 13 | Xr-RES/Pol0.25-T39 | 49.01 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 14 | Xr-RES/Pol0.5-T25 | 12.57 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 15 | Xr-RES/Pol0.5-T32 | 38.00 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 16 | Xr-RES/Pol0.5-T32 | 40.09 |
| 0.50 | 32 | 17 | Xr-RES/Pol0.5-T39 | 36.19 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 18 | Xr-RES/Pol0.75-T25 | 28.46 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 19 | Xr-RES/Pol0.75-T32 | 43.12 |
| 0.75 | 39 | 20 | Xr-RES/Pol0.75-T39 | 44.34 |
1 Each value is the average of three samples (p < 0.05). EE = encapsulation efficiency; RES/polymer ratio: 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75; Temperature: 25, 32 or 39 °C.
Equations yielded for the dependent variable (EE) as a function of the independent variables (RES/polymer ratio and temperature, normalized values) for the experimental design.
| Equation | R2 | Df | F | P | Std. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.96 | 4.5 | 29.03 | 0.001 | 3.69 |
|
| 0.97 | 4.5 | 49.96 | 0.003 | 2.74 |
C = RES/polymer ratio normalized value; C = RES/polymer ratio normalized value; XrEE = encapsulation efficiency in percentage for core cross-linked NPs; NonXrEE = encapsulation efficiency in percentage for non-cross-linked NPs
Figure 2Relative influence of the studied variables on encapsulation efficiency (EE%) in non-cross-linked and cross-linked nanoparticles.
Figure 3Response surface for RES encapsulation efficiency percentage on both, non- and cross-linked NPs.
Comparison of Z-average, polydispersity index (PdI), and hydrodynamic diameter (Dh, determined by DLS) of non-cross-linked NP (Non-Xr) and stabilized NP at 20% of cross-linking (Xr) (unloaded or loaded with RES).
| Unloaded Samples [ | Resveratrol-Loaded NPs | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of Crosslinking | Sample | Z-av (± SD) | PdI (± SD) | Size (± SD) (Dh. nm) | Sample | Z-av (± SD) | PdI (± SD) | Size (± SD) (Dh. nm) |
| (nm) | (nm) | |||||||
| Non-Xr | S-01 | 177 (± 1) | 0.14 (± 0.02) | 210 (± 80) | RES-Non-Xr | 115 (± 1) | 0.46 (± 0.01) | 170 (± 90) |
| Xr 20% | S-02 | 108 (± 1) | 0.33 (± 0.01) | 130 (± 70) | RES-Xr | 121 (± 1) | 0.27 (± 0.01) | 170 (± 90) |
The RES-loaded NPs were prepared at pH 7.0 according to the optimized conditions found in the present study: Sample RES-Non-Xr = Non-Xr-Res0.75-T39; RES-Xr = Xr-Res0.75-T39; Temperature = 39 °C; RES/polymer ratio = 0.75:1; loading time = 24 h.
Comparison of spreadability and TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis) data of resveratrol-loaded hydrogel-NP composites (with cross-linked NP and non-cross-linked NP.
| Sample | Spreadability (diameter, cm)a | TGAb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t 1 min | t 30 min | Δdiameter (%) | °Td (°C) | maxTd (°C) | ΔW (%) | Mass Residue at 650 °C (%) | |
| CTS | - | 110 | 72/297 | 9/58 | 30 | ||
| Xr-CTS-RES | 5 | 8.2 | 64 | 98 | 62/281 | 24/43 | 32 |
| Non-Xr-CTS-RES | 5.6 | 8.9 | 59 | 99 | 111/281 | 24/42 | 32 |
a: Spreadability measured in cm; ∆ diameter = change of diameter (in percentage) after 30 min; b: Onset decomposition temperature corresponding to 10% of weight loss (°Td); maximum rate decomposition temperatures (maxTd) and weight loss at the respective decomposition step [ΔW(%)] determined by TGA.
Figure 4TGA traces of commercial chitosan (solid line) and the two RES-loaded CTS-NP composites.
Figure 5SEM images of the loaded chitosan-based hydrogels: (A) Xr and (B) Non-Xr.
Figure 6In vitro release profiles of resveratrol in simulated colon conditions from resveratrol-loaded NPs (A) and resveratrol-loaded CTS-NPs composites (B).