Literature DB >> 30668800

Integration of Anatomy Ontologies and Evo-Devo Using Structured Markov Models Suggests a New Framework for Modeling Discrete Phenotypic Traits.

Sergei Tarasov1,2.   

Abstract

Modeling discrete phenotypic traits for either ancestral character state reconstruction or morphology-based phylogenetic inference suffers from ambiguities of character coding, homology assessment, dependencies, and selection of adequate models. These drawbacks occur because trait evolution is driven by two key processes-hierarchical and hidden-which are not accommodated simultaneously by the available phylogenetic methods. The hierarchical process refers to the dependencies between anatomical body parts, while the hidden process refers to the evolution of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) underlying trait development. Herein, I demonstrate that these processes can be efficiently modeled using structured Markov models (SMM) equipped with hidden states, which resolves the majority of the problems associated with discrete traits. Integration of SMM with anatomy ontologies can adequately incorporate the hierarchical dependencies, while the use of the hidden states accommodates hidden evolution of GRNs and substitution rate heterogeneity. I assess the new models using simulations and theoretical synthesis. The new approach solves the long-standing "tail color problem," in which the trait is scored for species with tails of different colors or no tails. It also presents a previously unknown issue called the "two-scientist paradox," in which the nature of coding the trait and the hidden processes driving the trait's evolution are confounded; failing to account for the hidden process may result in a bias, which can be avoided by using hidden state models. All this provides a clear guideline for coding traits into characters. This article gives practical examples of using the new framework for phylogenetic inference and comparative analysis.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy ontology; character; discrete trait; gene regulatory networks; hidden Markov models; homology; lumpability; morphology; structured Markov models

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30668800      PMCID: PMC6701457          DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syz005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  46 in total

Review 1.  Establishing homology criteria for regulatory gene networks: prospects and challenges.

Authors:  E Abouheif
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Character analysis in morphological phylogenetics: problems and solutions.

Authors:  J J Wiens
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 3.  Gene regulatory networks reused to build novel traits: co-option of an eye-related gene regulatory network in eye-like organs and red wing patches on insect wings is suggested by optix expression.

Authors:  Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Functional innovations and morphological diversification in parrotfish.

Authors:  Samantha A Price; Peter C Wainwright; David R Bellwood; Erem Kazancioglu; David C Collar; Thomas J Near
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Phenomics: the next challenge.

Authors:  David Houle; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Stig Omholt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Parallel genetic origins of pelvic reduction in vertebrates.

Authors:  Michael D Shapiro; Michael A Bell; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  RevBayes: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference Using Graphical Models and an Interactive Model-Specification Language.

Authors:  Sebastian Höhna; Michael J Landis; Tracy A Heath; Bastien Boussau; Nicolas Lartillot; Brian R Moore; John P Huelsenbeck; Fredrik Ronquist
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology.

Authors:  Christopher J Mungall; Carlo Torniai; Georgios V Gkoutos; Suzanna E Lewis; Melissa A Haendel
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  State aggregation for fast likelihood computations in molecular evolution.

Authors:  Iakov I Davydov; Marc Robinson-Rechavi; Nicolas Salamin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A Systematist's Guide to Estimating Bayesian Phylogenies From Morphological Data.

Authors:  April M Wright
Journal:  Insect Syst Divers       Date:  2019-06-18

2.  Assessing Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content of Morphological Data Using Knowledge From Anatomy Ontologies.

Authors:  Diego S Porto; Wasila M Dahdul; Hilmar Lapp; James P Balhoff; Todd J Vision; Paula M Mabee; Josef Uyeda
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.160

3.  A Logical Model of Homology for Comparative Biology.

Authors:  Paula M Mabee; James P Balhoff; Wasila M Dahdul; Hilmar Lapp; Christopher J Mungall; Todd J Vision
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Inferring the Total-Evidence Timescale of Marattialean Fern Evolution in the Face of Model Sensitivity.

Authors:  Michael R May; Dori L Contreras; Michael A Sundue; Nathalie S Nagalingum; Cindy V Looy; Carl J Rothfels
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  New opabiniid diversifies the weirdest wonders of the euarthropod stem group.

Authors:  Stephen Pates; Joanna M Wolfe; Rudy Lerosey-Aubril; Allison C Daley; Javier Ortega-Hernández
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Alexander Pohle; Björn Kröger; Rachel C M Warnock; Andy H King; David H Evans; Martina Aubrechtová; Marcela Cichowolski; Xiang Fang; Christian Klug
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Exceptional evolutionary lability of flower-like inflorescences (pseudanthia) in Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae.

Authors:  Jakub Baczyński; Hervé Sauquet; Krzysztof Spalik
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.325

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.