Literature DB >> 30668726

Evaluation of Brassica carinata meal on ruminant metabolism and apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in beef steers1,2.

Tessa M Schulmeister1, Martin Ruiz-Moreno1, Gleise M Silva1, M Garcia-Ascolani1, Francine M Ciriaco1, Darren D Henry2, Graham Cliff Lamb3, Jose C B Dubeux1, Nicolas DiLorenzo1.   

Abstract

Brassica carinata is a new oilseed crop with the potential of producing high-quality jet biofuel. A high-protein meal (~40% crude protein) is obtained as a byproduct of hexane-solvent oil extraction; however, limited research is available on the use of this meal as a protein supplement for beef cattle. A duplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design was used to determine the effects of supplementation with B. carinata meal on ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and blood metabolites in beef cattle consuming bahiagrass hay (Paspalum notatum Flüggé), compared with frequently used protein supplements. Eight Angus crossbred steers (473 ± 119 kg initial BW) were randomly allocated to 8 pens, over 4 periods of 28-d each. Within period, steers were assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) 1.62 kg/d cottonseed meal (CSM); 2) 2.15 kg/d dry distillers grains plus solubles (DDGS); 3) 1.39 kg/d B. carinata meal pellets (BCM); or 4) 1.17 kg/d soybean meal (SBM), supplemented daily, on an isonitrogenous basis. Steers had ad libitum access to bahiagrass hay and water. Intake was measured using the GrowSafe system. Following a 14-d adaptation, feed and fecal samples were collected to determine apparent total tract nutrient digestibility using indigestible NDF as an internal marker. Blood and ruminal fluid samples were collected before providing the protein supplements and then every 3 h, during a 24-h period, to analyze urea nitrogen (PUN) and glucose in plasma, as well as ruminal pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and VFA concentrations. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS with repeated measures. Model included the fixed effects of treatment, time, treatment × time, square, and period, and the random effects of steer(square) and steer(treatment). No effect of treatment (P > 0.05) was observed for pH, NH3-N, or glucose concentration. An effect of treatment (P < 0.01) was observed for PUN, with steers receiving SBM having greater concentrations. A treatment × time interaction was observed (P < 0.05) for total VFA concentration, acetate to propionate ratio, and molar proportions of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and valerate. Steers consuming SBM had greater molar proportions of branched-chain VFA (P < 0.01) compared with CSM and DDGS. There was no effect of treatment (P > 0.05) on intake or apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients. Brassica carinata performed similarly to commonly used protein supplements indicating its viability as a protein supplement for beef cattle.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Brassica carinatazzm321990 ; beef cattle; digestibility; metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30668726      PMCID: PMC6396248          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

Review 1.  Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?

Authors:  J B Russell; D B Wilson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 2.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Effect of ammonia concentration of rumen microbial protein production in vitro.

Authors:  L D Satter; L L Slyter
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Effect of increasing the dietary level of rapeseed meal on intake by growing beef steers.

Authors:  G P Lardy; M S Kerley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Estrogenic activity and growth stimulation in steers fed varying protein levels.

Authors:  R L Preston; F Byers; K R Stevens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media.

Authors:  G A Broderick; J H Kang
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effect of diet composition and incubation time on feed indigestible neutral detergent fiber concentration in dairy cows.

Authors:  S J Krizsan; P Huhtanen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Mitigation of in vitro hydrogen sulfide production using bismuth subsalicylate with and without monensin in beef feedlot diets.

Authors:  M Ruiz-Moreno; E Binversie; S W Fessenden; M D Stern
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Evaluation of carinata meal as a feedstuff for growing dairy heifers: Effects on growth performance, rumen fermentation, and total-tract digestibility of nutrients.

Authors:  K Rodriguez-Hernandez; J L Anderson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Production of branched-chain volatile fatty acids by certain anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  M J Allison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Polyclonal antibody preparations from avian origin as a feed additive to beef cattle: ruminal fermentation during the step-up transition diets.

Authors:  Gleise M Silva; Federico Podversich; Tessa M Schulmeister; Erick R S Santos; Carla Sanford; Michelle C B Siqueira; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Characterization of dietary protein in Brassica carinata meal when used as a protein supplement for beef cattle consuming a forage-based diet.

Authors:  Tessa M Schulmeister; Martin Ruiz-Moreno; Gleise M Silva; Mariana Garcia-Ascolani; Francine M Ciriaco; Darren D Henry; G Cliff Lamb; Jose C B Dubeux; Nicolas DiLorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Feeding Canola, Camelina, and Carinata Meals to Ruminants.

Authors:  Eduardo Marostegan Paula; Lorrayny Galoro da Silva; Virginia Lucia Neves Brandao; Xiaoxia Dai; Antonio Pinheiro Faciola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.