Literature DB >> 30667337

Robotic versus Freehand Needle Positioning in CT-guided Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Wouter J Heerink1, Simeon J S Ruiter1, Jan Pieter Pennings1, Benno Lansdorp1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart1, Matthijs Oudkerk1, Koert P de Jong1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare the accuracy of freehand versus robotic antenna placement in CT-guided microwave ablation (MWA) of liver tumors. Materials and Methods This study was conducted as a prospective single-center nonblinded randomized controlled trial (Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR6023). Eligible study participants had undergone clinically indicated CT-guided MWA of liver tumors and were able to receive a CT contrast agent. Randomization was performed per tumor after identification on contrast material-enhanced CT images. The primary outcome was the number of antenna repositionings, which was compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary outcomes were lateral targeting error stratified by in-plane and out-of-plane targets and targeting time. Results Between February 14 and November 12, 2017, 31 participants with a mean age of 63 years (range, 25-88 years) were included: 17 women (mean age, 57 years; range, 25-77 years) and 14 men (mean age, 70 years; range, 52-88 years). The freehand study arm consisted of 19 participants, while the robotic study arm consisted of 18 participants; six participants with multiple tumors were included in both arms. Forty-seven tumors were assessed; five tumors were excluded from the analysis because of technical limitations. In the robotic arm, no antenna repositioning was required. In the freehand arm, a median of one repositioning was required (range, zero to seven repositionings; P < .001). For out-of-plane targets, lateral targeting error was 10.1 mm ± 4.0 and 5.9 mm ± 2.9 (P = .007) for freehand and robotic procedures, respectively, and for in-plane targets, lateral targeting error was 6.2 mm ± 2.7 and 7.7 mm ± 5.9, respectively (P = .51). Mean targeting time was 19 minutes (range, 8-55 minutes) and 36 minutes (range, 3-70 minutes; P = .001) for freehand and robotic procedures, respectively. Conclusion Robotic antenna guidance reduces the need for antenna repositioning in microwave ablation to accurately target liver tumors and increases accuracy for out-of-plane targets. However, targeting time was greater with robotic guidance than with freehand targeting. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30667337     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Robotic Tissue Sampling for Safe Post-Mortem Biopsy in Infectious Corpses.

Authors:  Maximilian Neidhardt; Stefan Gerlach; Robin Mieling; Max-Heinrich Laves; Thorben Weib; Martin Gromniak; Antonia Fitzek; Dustin Mobius; Inga Kniep; Alexandra Ron; Julia Schadler; Axel Heinemann; Klaus Puschel; Benjamin Ondruschka; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2022-01-26

2.  Towards Autonomous Robotic Biopsy-Design, Modeling and Control of a Robot for Needle Insertion of a Commercial Full Core Biopsy Instrument.

Authors:  Seyed MohammadReza Sajadi; Seyed Mojtaba Karbasi; Henrik Brun; Jim Tørresen; Ole Jacob Elle; Kim Mathiassen
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Raluca-Maria Sandu; Iwan Paolucci; Simeon J S Ruiter; Raphael Sznitman; Koert P de Jong; Jacob Freedman; Stefan Weber; Pascale Tinguely
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  A review of conventional and newer generation microwave ablation systems for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kento Imajo; Yuji Ogawa; Masato Yoneda; Satoru Saito; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  GantryMate: A Modular MR-Compatible Assistance System for MR-Guided Needle Interventions.

Authors:  Andreas Reichert; Michael Bock; Michael Vogele; Axel Joachim Krafft
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-06

6.  Feasibility, safety and accuracy of a CT-guided robotic assistance for percutaneous needle placement in a swine liver model.

Authors:  Boris Guiu; Thierry De Baère; Guillaume Noel; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward.

Authors:  Yuan-Mao Lin; Iwan Paolucci; Kristy K Brock; Bruno C Odisio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Stereotactic and Robotic Minimally Invasive Thermal Ablation of Malignant Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pascale Tinguely; Iwan Paolucci; Simeon J S Ruiter; Stefan Weber; Koert P de Jong; Daniel Candinas; Jacob Freedman; Jennie Engstrand
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  3D Quantitative Ablation Margins for Prediction of Ablation Site Recurrence After Stereotactic Image-Guided Microwave Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simeon J S Ruiter; Pascale Tinguely; Iwan Paolucci; Jennie Engstrand; Daniel Candinas; Stefan Weber; Robbert J de Haas; Koert P de Jong; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  TIGIT Blockade Exerts Synergistic Effects on Microwave Ablation Against Cancer.

Authors:  Yaping Chen; Hao Huang; Yuan Li; Wenlu Xiao; Yingting Liu; Rongzhang Chen; Yulan Zhu; Xiao Zheng; Changping Wu; Lujun Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.