Literature DB >> 30667044

Secondary metabolites from nectar and pollen: a resource for ecological and evolutionary studies.

Evan C Palmer-Young1, Iain W Farrell2, Lynn S Adler1, Nelson J Milano1, Paul A Egan3, Rebecca E Irwin4, Philip C Stevenson2,5.   

Abstract

Floral chemistry mediates plant interactions with herbivores, pathogens, and pollinators. The chemistry of floral nectar and pollen, the primary food rewards for pollinators, can affect both plant reproduction and pollinator health. Although the existence and functional significance of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites has long been known, comprehensive quantitative characterizations of secondary chemistry exist for only a few species. Moreover, little is known about intraspecific variation in nectar and pollen chemical profiles. Because the ecological effects of secondary chemicals are dose-dependent, heterogeneity across genotypes and populations could influence floral trait evolution and pollinator foraging ecology. To better understand within- and across-species heterogeneity in nectar and pollen secondary chemistry, we undertook exhaustive LC-MS and LC-UV-based chemical characterizations of nectar and pollen methanol extracts from 31 cultivated and wild plant species. Nectar and pollen were collected from farms and natural areas in Massachusetts, Vermont, and California, USA, in 2013 and 2014. For wild species, we aimed to collect 10 samples from each of three sites. For agricultural and horticultural species, we aimed for 10 samples from each of three cultivars. Our data set (1,535 samples, 102 identified compounds) identifies and quantifies each compound recorded in methanolic extracts, and includes chemical metadata that describe the molecular mass, retention time, and chemical classification of each compound. A reference phylogeny is included for comparative analyses. We found that each species possessed a distinct chemical profile; moreover, within species, few compounds were found in both nectar and pollen. The most common secondary chemical classes were flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids and amines, and chlorogenic acids. The most common compounds were quercetin and kaempferol glycosides. Pollens contained high concentrations of hydroxycinnamoyl-spermidine conjugates, mainly triscoumaroyl and trisferuloyl spermidine, found in 71% of species. When present, pollen alkaloids and spermidines had median nonzero concentrations of 23,000 μmol/L (median 52% of recorded micromolar composition). Although secondary chemistry was qualitatively consistent within each species and sample type, we found significant quantitative heterogeneity across cultivars and sites. These data provide a standard reference for future ecological and evolutionary research on nectar and pollen secondary chemistry, including its role in pollinator health and plant reproduction. Data are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0 US) and may be freely used if properly cited.
© 2019 The Authors. Ecology © 2019 The Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allelopathy; cultivar variation; diversity; floral chemistry; floral rewards; intraspecific variation; liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry; mutualisms; plant secondary metabolites; plant-microbe interactions; plant-pollinator interactions; site variation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30667044     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  12 in total

1.  Pollinator selection against toxic nectar as a key facilitator of a plant invasion.

Authors:  Paul A Egan; Philip C Stevenson; Jane C Stout
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 2.  Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.

Authors:  Susan W Nicolson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Understanding effects of floral products on bee parasites: Mechanisms, synergism, and ecological complexity.

Authors:  Gordon Fitch; Laura L Figueroa; Hauke Koch; Philip C Stevenson; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Poison or Potion: Effects of Sunflower Phenolamides on Bumble Bees and Their Gut Parasite.

Authors:  Antoine Gekière; Irène Semay; Maxence Gérard; Denis Michez; Pascal Gerbaux; Maryse Vanderplanck
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  Can floral nectars reduce transmission of Leishmania?

Authors:  Evan C Palmer-Young; Ryan S Schwarz; Yanping Chen; Jay D Evans
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-05-12

6.  Natural processes influencing pollinator health.

Authors:  Philip C Stevenson; Hauke Koch; Susan W Nicolson; Mark J F Brown
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Discovery of octopamine and tyramine in nectar and their effects on bumblebee behavior.

Authors:  Felicity Muth; Casey S Philbin; Christopher S Jeffrey; Anne S Leonard
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-16

8.  Biological Properties of Bee Bread Collected from Apiaries Located across Greece.

Authors:  Nikos Asoutis Didaras; Ioannis Kafantaris; Tilemachos G Dimitriou; Chrysanthi Mitsagga; Katerina Karatasou; Ioannis Giavasis; Dimitris Stagos; Grigoris D Amoutzias; Fani Hatjina; Dimitris Mossialos
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Temperature-Dependent Compatible and Incompatible Pollen-Style Interactions in Citrus clementina Hort. ex Tan. Show Different Transglutaminase Features and Polyamine Pattern.

Authors:  Iris Aloisi; Gaetano Distefano; Fabiana Antognoni; Giulia Potente; Luigi Parrotta; Claudia Faleri; Alessandra Gentile; Stefania Bennici; Lavinia Mareri; Giampiero Cai; Stefano Del Duca
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Patterns of floral nectar standing crops allow plants to manipulate their pollinators.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; John R M Kalman; Dayanne M Bordin; Lucas Blanes; Philip A Doble
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.