Saumya S Gurbani1,2, Sulaiman Sheriff3, Andrew A Maudsley3, Hyunsuk Shim1,2,4, Lee A D Cooper2,5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida. 4. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: MRSI has shown great promise in the detection and monitoring of neurologic pathologies such as tumor. A necessary component of data processing includes the quantitation of each metabolite, typically done through fitting a model of the spectrum to the data. For high-resolution volumetric MRSI of the brain, which may have ~10,000 spectra, significant processing time is required for spectral analysis and generation of metabolite maps. METHODS: A novel unsupervised deep learning architecture that combines a convolutional neural network with a priori models of the spectrum is presented. This architecture, a convolutional encoder-model decoder (CEMD), combines the strengths of adaptive and unbiased convolutional networks with models of magnetic resonance and is readily interpretable. RESULTS: The CEMD architecture performs accurate spectral fitting for volumetric MRSI in patients with glioblastoma, provides whole-brain fitting in 1 min on a standard computer, and handles a variety of spectral artifacts. CONCLUSION: A new architecture combining physics domain knowledge with convolutional neural networks has been developed and is able to perform rapid spectral fitting of whole-brain data. Rapid processing is a critical step toward routine clinical practice.
PURPOSE: MRSI has shown great promise in the detection and monitoring of neurologic pathologies such as tumor. A necessary component of data processing includes the quantitation of each metabolite, typically done through fitting a model of the spectrum to the data. For high-resolution volumetric MRSI of the brain, which may have ~10,000 spectra, significant processing time is required for spectral analysis and generation of metabolite maps. METHODS: A novel unsupervised deep learning architecture that combines a convolutional neural network with a priori models of the spectrum is presented. This architecture, a convolutional encoder-model decoder (CEMD), combines the strengths of adaptive and unbiased convolutional networks with models of magnetic resonance and is readily interpretable. RESULTS: The CEMD architecture performs accurate spectral fitting for volumetric MRSI in patients with glioblastoma, provides whole-brain fitting in 1 min on a standard computer, and handles a variety of spectral artifacts. CONCLUSION: A new architecture combining physics domain knowledge with convolutional neural networks has been developed and is able to perform rapid spectral fitting of whole-brain data. Rapid processing is a critical step toward routine clinical practice.
Authors: James S Cordova; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Zhongxing Liang; Saumya S Gurbani; Lee A D Cooper; Chad A Holder; Jeffrey J Olson; Brad Kairdolf; Eduard Schreibmann; Stewart G Neill; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis; Hyunsuk Shim Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Saumya S Gurbani; Eduard Schreibmann; Andrew A Maudsley; James Scott Cordova; Brian J Soher; Harish Poptani; Gaurav Verma; Peter B Barker; Hyunsuk Shim; Lee A D Cooper Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: A Pirzkall; T R McKnight; E E Graves; M P Carol; P K Sneed; W W Wara; S J Nelson; L J Verhey; D A Larson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mohammad Sabati; Sulaiman Sheriff; Meng Gu; Juan Wei; Henry Zhu; Peter B Barker; Daniel M Spielman; Jeffry R Alger; Andrew A Maudsley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J Scott Cordova; Shravan Kandula; Saumya Gurbani; Jim Zhong; Mital Tejani; Oluwatosin Kayode; Kirtesh Patel; Roshan Prabhu; Eduard Schreibmann; Ian Crocker; Chad A Holder; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo Shu Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-12
Authors: Peter C M van Zijl; Kevin Brindle; Hanzhang Lu; Peter B Barker; Richard Edden; Nirbhay Yadav; Linda Knutsson Journal: Curr Opin Chem Biol Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 8.972
Authors: Jacopo Acquarelli; Twan van Laarhoven; Geert J Postma; Jeroen J Jansen; Anne Rijpma; Sjaak van Asten; Arend Heerschap; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Elena Marchiori Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Andrew A Maudsley; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter B Barker; Alberto Bizzi; Wolfgang Bogner; Anke Henning; Sarah J Nelson; Stefan Posse; Dikoma C Shungu; Brian J Soher Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 4.044