Stefan J Schaller1, Flora T Scheffenbichler2, Somnath Bose3, Nicole Mazwi4, Hao Deng2, Franziska Krebs1, Christian L Seifert5, George Kasotakis6, Stephanie D Grabitz2, Nicola Latronico7, Timothy Houle2, Manfred Blobner1, Matthias Eikermann8,9. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 6. Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Spedali Civili University Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 8. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. meikerma@bidmc.harvard.edu. 9. Essen-Duisburg University, Medical Faculty, Essen, Germany. meikerma@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Early mobilization within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves functional status at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early, goal-directed mobilization in critically ill patients across a broad spectrum of initial consciousness levels. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the international, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor blinded SOMS trial conducted 2011-2015. Randomization was stratified according to the immediate post-injury Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤ 8 or > 8). Patients received either SOMS-guided mobility treatment with a facilitator or standard care. We used general linear models to test the hypothesis that immediate post-randomization GCS modulates the intervention effects on functional independence at hospital discharge. RESULTS:Two hundred patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The significant effect of early, goal-directed mobilization was consistent across levels of GCS without evidence of effect modification, for the primary outcome functional independence at hospital discharge (p = 0.53 for interaction), as well as average achieved mobility level during ICU stay (mean achieved SOMS level) and functional status at hospital discharge measured with the functional independence measure. In patients with low GCS, delay to first mobilization therapy was longer (0.7 ± 0.2 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 days, p = 0.008), but early, goal-directed mobilization compared with standard care significantly increased functional independence at hospital discharge in this subgroup of patients with immediate post-randomization GCS ≤ 8 (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.02-13.14; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial suggests that early, goal-directed mobilization in patients with an impaired initial conscious state (GCS ≤ 8) is not harmful but effective.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Early mobilization within 72 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves functional status at hospital discharge. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of early, goal-directed mobilization in critically illpatients across a broad spectrum of initial consciousness levels. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the international, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor blinded SOMS trial conducted 2011-2015. Randomization was stratified according to the immediate post-injury Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤ 8 or > 8). Patients received either SOMS-guided mobility treatment with a facilitator or standard care. We used general linear models to test the hypothesis that immediate post-randomization GCS modulates the intervention effects on functional independence at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The significant effect of early, goal-directed mobilization was consistent across levels of GCS without evidence of effect modification, for the primary outcome functional independence at hospital discharge (p = 0.53 for interaction), as well as average achieved mobility level during ICU stay (mean achieved SOMS level) and functional status at hospital discharge measured with the functional independence measure. In patients with low GCS, delay to first mobilization therapy was longer (0.7 ± 0.2 days vs. 0.2 ± 0.1 days, p = 0.008), but early, goal-directed mobilization compared with standard care significantly increased functional independence at hospital discharge in this subgroup of patients with immediate post-randomization GCS ≤ 8 (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.02-13.14; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial suggests that early, goal-directed mobilization in patients with an impaired initial conscious state (GCS ≤ 8) is not harmful but effective.
Entities:
Keywords:
Consciousness; Critical care; Delirium; Early mobilization; Early rehabilitation; Functional status; Neurocritical care
Authors: Marc Moss; Amy Nordon-Craft; Dan Malone; David Van Pelt; Stephen K Frankel; Mary Laird Warner; Wendy Kriekels; Monica McNulty; Diane L Fairclough; Margaret Schenkman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-05-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W Lee Titsworth; Jeannette Hester; Tom Correia; Richard Reed; Peggy Guin; Lennox Archibald; A Joseph Layon; J Mocco Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Peter E Morris; Michael J Berry; D Clark Files; J Clifton Thompson; Jordan Hauser; Lori Flores; Sanjay Dhar; Elizabeth Chmelo; James Lovato; L Douglas Case; Rita N Bakhru; Aarti Sarwal; Selina M Parry; Pamela Campbell; Arthur Mote; Chris Winkelman; Robert D Hite; Barbara Nicklas; Arjun Chatterjee; Michael P Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carol Hodgson; Rinaldo Bellomo; Susan Berney; Michael Bailey; Heidi Buhr; Linda Denehy; Megan Harrold; Alisa Higgins; Jeff Presneill; Manoj Saxena; Elizabeth Skinner; Paul Young; Steven Webb Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Maximilian S Schaefer; Maximilian Hammer; Katharina Platzbecker; Peter Santer; Stephanie D Grabitz; Kadhiresan R Murugappan; Tim Houle; Sheila Barnett; Edward K Rodriguez; Matthias Eikermann Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.755