Literature DB >> 30665684

Is it possible to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? Yes, using a simple score!

Larissa C Marques1, Gustavo Nader Marta2, Juliana Z de Andrade1, Danúbia Andrade1, Alfredo C S D de Barros1, Felipe E M Andrade1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma ductal in situ (DCIS) present stromal invasion in the final surgical specimen. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of upstaging in women with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS and identify predictive factors of invasion.

METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including patients with an initial unilateral DCIS diagnosed through needle core or vacuum-assisted biopsy. All patients were submitted to surgical excision. Clinical, radiological and histological variables were retrospectively collected from our medical records.

RESULTS: A total of 169 biopsies diagnosed with DCIS were included in this study. 53 patients presented upstaging for invasive carcinoma (31.4%). In the univariate analysis the following variables were significantly associated with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) at final diagnosis: age < 46 years, the presence of a palpable mass, type of biopsy, nuclear grade, and comedonecrosis. The frequency of upstaging did not vary according to the tumor size or menopausal status. In the multivariate analysis, only the type of biopsy and the presence of comedonecrosis remained as independent predictors of invasion. Our score attributed specific points according to the type of biopsy and the presence of comedonecrosis, ranging from 0 to 2.5, showing a very good predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS: We were able to identify that the type of biopsy and comedonecrosis are predictive factors of stromal invasion among women with DCIS. The proposed score has shown a good predictive ability and its utilization in the clinical practice can improve therapeutic planning.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Needle biopsy; Prediction invasion; Risk score

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30665684     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  3 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Is conservative management of ductal carcinoma in situ risky?

Authors:  Lan Zheng; Yesim Gökmen-Polar; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-04-28

3.  Pathological underestimation and biomarkers concordance rates in breast cancer patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ at preoperative biopsy.

Authors:  Hemei Zhou; Jing Yu; Xiaodong Wang; Kunwei Shen; Jiandong Ye; Xiaosong Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.