Literature DB >> 30665506

Prescriptive adherence to GINA guidelines and asthma control: An Italian cross sectional study in general practice.

Sandra Baldacci1, Marzia Simoni1, Sara Maio1, Anna Angino1, Franca Martini1, Giuseppe Sarno1, Sonia Cerrai1, Patrizia Silvi1, Anna Paola Pala2, Megon Bresciani1, Pierluigi Paggiaro3, Giovanni Viegi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although general practitioners (GPs) are frequently the first healthcare professionals whom asthma patients refer to for their symptoms, few studies have explored the extent of adherence to guidelines for asthma management based on data provided directly by GPs. Aims of the present study were to assess drug prescriptions for asthma by GPs and to evaluate prescriptive adherence to GINA guidelines (GL) and its relationship with disease control in real life.
METHODS: 995 asthmatic patients (45% males, mean age 43.3 ± 17.7 yrs) were enrolled by 107 Italian GPs distributed throughout the country. Data on diagnosis, disease severity, prescribed anti-asthmatic drugs and control were collected through questionnaires filled out by GPs taking into consideration the 2009 GINA Guidelines. Data on drug use and chronic sinusitis, nasal polyposis, chronic bronchitis, emphysema were reported by patients through a self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: The large majority of patients were classified by GPs as having intermittent (48.4%) or mild persistent asthma (25.3%); 61% had co-morbid allergic rhinitis (AR). The prevalent therapeutic regimen used by patients was a combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) (54.1%), even in the intermittent/mild persistent group. ICS as mono-therapy or in combination with other drugs but LABA, was the second most frequently adopted treatment (14.4%). In general, the GPs adherence to GL treatment indications was 28.8%, with a significant association with a good asthma control (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.92). On the other hand, comorbidity (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84), moderate (0.44, 0.28-0.69) and severe (0.06, 0.02-0.20) persistent asthma showed significant negative effects on asthma control.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that over-treatment of intermittent/mild persistent asthma is frequent in the GPs setting while therapeutic regimens are more appropriately applied for moderate/severe asthma. In general, we found low adherence to GINA GL treatment recommendations even if its relevance in asthma control was confirmed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Allergic rhinitis; Asthma; Control; Cross sectional study; Drug prescriptions; GINA guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30665506     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  8 in total

1.  From the Global Initiative for Asthma report and asthma guidelines to real-life asthma control: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  Elio Novembre; Mattia Giovannini; Simona Barni; Francesca Mori
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  Rapid effects of benralizumab on severe asthma during surgery for residual tumor after advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma treatment with pembrolizumab.

Authors:  Takehiro Izumo; Yuriko Terada; Mari Tone; Minoru Inomata; Naoyuki Kuse; Nobuyasu Awano; Atsuko Moriya; Tatsunori Jo; Hanako Yoshimura; Yoshiaki Furuhata
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 3.  Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?

Authors:  Monica J Fletcher; Ioanna Tsiligianni; Janwillem W H Kocks; Andrew Cave; Chi Chunhua; Jaime Correia de Sousa; Miguel Román-Rodríguez; Mike Thomas; Peter Kardos; Carol Stonham; Ee Ming Khoo; David Leather; Thys van der Molen
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.871

4.  Upsides and downsides of a telecounselling model of integrated asthma management between general practitioners and specialists.

Authors:  Fabiana Furci; Marco Caminati; Sara Genovese; Sebastiano Gangemi; Gianenrico Senna
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 5.  Controversies in the treatment of mild asthma. What novelties and practical implications?

Authors:  Maria Angela Tosca; Maria Elisa Di Cicco; Maddalena Leone; Maria Scavone; Amelia Licari
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 6.  Intermittent and mild persistent asthma: how therapy has changed.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Di Cicco; Maddalena Leone; Maria Scavone; Michele Miraglia Del Giudice; Amelia Licari; Marzia Duse; Ilaria Brambilla; Giorgio Ciprandi; Carlo Caffarelli; Mariangela Tosca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-29

7.  Effectiveness and safety of benralizumab for severe asthma in clinical practice (J-BEST): a prospective study.

Authors:  Takehiro Izumo; Mari Tone; Naoyuki Kuse; Nobuyasu Awano; Atsuko Tanaka; Tatsunori Jo; Hanako Yoshimura; Jonsu Minami; Kohei Takada; Minoru Inomata
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

8.  Effect of an Educational Program on Healthcare Professionals' Readiness to Support Patients with Asthma, Allergies, and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease for Improved Medication Adherence.

Authors:  Malin Axelsson; Benita Björk; Ulrika Berg; Karin Persson
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.