Literature DB >> 30665159

Performance metrics for the objective assessment of capacitive deionization systems.

Steven A Hawks1, Ashwin Ramachandran2, Slawomir Porada3, Patrick G Campbell1, Matthew E Suss4, P M Biesheuvel5, Juan G Santiago6, Michael Stadermann7.   

Abstract

In the growing field of capacitive deionization (CDI), a number of performance metrics have emerged to describe the desalination process. Unfortunately, the separation conditions under which these metrics are measured are often not specified, resulting in optimal performance at minimal removal. Here we outline a system of performance metrics and reporting conditions that resolves this issue. Our proposed system is based on volumetric energy consumption (Wh/m3) and throughput productivity (L/h/m2) reported for a specific average concentration reduction, water recovery, and feed salinity. To facilitate and rationalize comparisons between devices, materials, and operation modes, we propose a nominal standard separation of removing 5 mM from a 20 mM NaCl feed solution at 50% water recovery. We propose this particular separation as a standard, but emphasize that the rationale presented here applies irrespective of separation details. Using our proposed separation, we compare the desalination performance of a flow-through electrode (fte-CDI) cell and a flow between membrane (fb-MCDI) device, showing how significantly different systems can be compared in terms of generally desirable desalination characteristics. In general, we find that performance analysis must be considered carefully so to not allow for ambiguous separation conditions or the maximization of one metric at the expense of another. Additionally, for context and clarity, we discuss a number of important underlying performance indicators and cell characteristics that are not performance measures in and of themselves but can be examined to better understand differences in performance.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDI; Capacitive deionization; Capacitive desalination; Performance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30665159     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical Methods for Water Purification, Ion Separations, and Energy Conversion.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alkhadra; Xiao Su; Matthew E Suss; Huanhuan Tian; Eric N Guyes; Amit N Shocron; Kameron M Conforti; J Pedro de Souza; Nayeong Kim; Michele Tedesco; Khoiruddin Khoiruddin; I Gede Wenten; Juan G Santiago; T Alan Hatton; Martin Z Bazant
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Electrochemical investigation of carbon paper/ZnO nanocomposite electrodes for capacitive anion capturing.

Authors:  Ebrahim Chalangar; Emma M Björk; Håkan Pettersson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Assembly of Soft Electrodes and Ion Exchange Membranes for Capacitive Deionization.

Authors:  Silvia Ahualli; Sergio Orozco-Barrera; María Del Mar Fernández; Ángel V Delgado; Guillermo R Iglesias
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Electrochemical removal of amphoteric ions.

Authors:  Amit N Shocron; Eric N Guyes; Huub H M Rijnaarts; P M Biesheuvel; Matthew E Suss; Jouke E Dykstra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toward sustainable desalination using food waste: capacitive desalination with bread-derived electrodes.

Authors:  Adam R Wood; Raghav Garg; Tzahi Cohen-Karni; Alan J Russell; Philip LeDuc
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Dual-Zinc Electrode Electrochemical Desalination.

Authors:  Jinhong Dai; Jian Wang; Xianhua Hou; Qiang Ru; Qingyu He; Pattarachai Srimuk; Volker Presser; Fuming Chen
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.