| Literature DB >> 30664730 |
Wannes Hubau1,2,3, Tom De Mil4,5, Jan Van den Bulcke5,6, Oliver L Phillips7, Bhély Angoboy Ilondea4,8,9, Joris Van Acker5,6, Martin J P Sullivan7, Laurent Nsenga4, Benjamin Toirambe4, Camille Couralet4, Lindsay F Banin10, Serge K Begne7,11, Timothy R Baker7, Nils Bourland4,12,13,14, Eric Chezeaux15, Connie J Clark16, Murray Collins17, James A Comiskey18,19, Aida Cuni-Sanchez20,21, Victor Deklerck5,6, Sofie Dierickx4, Jean-Louis Doucet13, Corneille E N Ewango22,23,24, Ted R Feldpausch25, Martin Gilpin7, Christelle Gonmadje26, Jefferson S Hall27, David J Harris28, Olivier J Hardy29, Marie-Noel D Kamdem11,30, Emmanuel Kasongo Yakusu4,5,24, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez7, Jean-Remy Makana22, Yadvinder Malhi31, Faustin M Mbayu24, Sam Moore31, Jacques Mukinzi22,32, Georgia Pickavance7, John R Poulsen16, Jan Reitsma33, Mélissa Rousseau4,14, Bonaventure Sonké11, Terry Sunderland12,34, Hermann Taedoumg11, Joey Talbot7, John Tshibamba Mukendi4,24,35, Peter M Umunay36, Jason Vleminckx29,37, Lee J T White38,39,40, Lise Zemagho11, Simon L Lewis7,20, Hans Beeckman4.
Abstract
Quantifying carbon dynamics in forests is critical for understanding their role in long-term climate regulation1-4. Yet little is known about tree longevity in tropical forests3,5-8, a factor that is vital for estimating carbon persistence3,4. Here we calculate mean carbon age (the period that carbon is fixed in trees7) in different strata of African tropical forests using (1) growth-ring records with a unique timestamp accurately demarcating 66 years of growth in one site and (2) measurements of diameter increments from the African Tropical Rainforest Observation Network (23 sites). We find that in spite of their much smaller size, in understory trees mean carbon age (74 years) is greater than in sub-canopy (54 years) and canopy (57 years) trees and similar to carbon age in emergent trees (66 years). The remarkable carbon longevity in the understory results from slow and aperiodic growth as an adaptation to limited resource availability9-11. Our analysis also reveals that while the understory represents a small share (11%) of the carbon stock12,13, it contributes disproportionally to the forest carbon sink (20%). We conclude that accounting for the diversity of carbon age and carbon sequestration among different forest strata is critical for effective conservation management14-16 and for accurate modelling of carbon cycling4.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30664730 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-018-0316-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Plants ISSN: 2055-0278 Impact factor: 15.793